Researchers have noticed that people whose blood shows : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 19 Jan 2017, 06:08

# LIVE NOW:

Chat with Admission Manager and Current Student of NUS SIngapore - Join Chat Room to Participate.

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Researchers have noticed that people whose blood shows

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 376
Location: Phoenix AZ
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [4] , given: 0

Researchers have noticed that people whose blood shows [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2006, 21:29
4
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

75% (02:09) correct 25% (01:30) wrong based on 449 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Researchers have noticed that people whose blood shows abnormally low levels of calcium usually have laryngeal polyps, which can permanently damage vocal cords and result in partial or even total loss of voice. In order to prevent the polyps, the researchers recommend a diet high in calcium-rich foods such as dairy and green, leafy vegetables.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly suggests that it would not be advisable to follow the researchers'

(A) Dairy contains compounds that are difficult for many people to digest.
(B) Laryngeal polyps sometimes disappear without treatment.
(C) Laryngeal polyps cause a change in body chemistry that blocks the absorption of calcium.
(D) Fresh vegetables are not always available in all seasons.
(E) Low levels of calcium can sometime be remedied with vitamin pills.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 83
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [2] , given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2006, 11:37
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Yes I agree with ucsfcsguy ... I was of the same opinion that eating diet rich in calcium will not "prevent" polyps if you already have it.

But I think the question is trying to emphasise on the reversal of cause and effect here.

It is not the calcium deficiency that causes polyps.
Polyps reduces calcium absorption (leading to the deficiency perhaps).

So the prevention and cure for polyps is not "intake of calcium rich diet" but something else. Hence it is not advisable to follow the researcher's plan because calcium deficiency is not the source of the problem. And C suggests this.

A is too general and besides I find that for strengthen/weaken questions, answer choices that have ambiguous words like 'many', 'some', 'sometimes' are generally not the correct answer choices because they indicate that the answer choice might hold true in some situations while not in others. Therefore these answer choices don't "most strongly" strengthen or weaken a conclusion. For this reason I would eliminate A.
_________________

Try and try until you succeed! There is just no giving up!

Manager
Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 77
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 67 [2] , given: 1

### Show Tags

19 Jun 2011, 07:06
2
KUDOS
C

Since Laryngeal polyps blocks the absorption of calcium, the diet would not be effective.

siddhans wrote:
Is this a flaw or a weaken question? How to identify this? Whats the main difference between the two ? and their approaches? How to use elimination to solve this? Please provide detailed explanation.

Researchers have noticed that people whose blood shows abnormally low levels of calcium usually have laryngeal polyps, which can permanently damage vocal cords and result in partial or even total loss of voice. In order to reduce the risk of polyps, the researchers recommend a diet high in calcium-rich foods such as dairy and green, leafy vegetables.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly suggests that following the researchers' recommendation would NOT be effective?

a)Dairy contains compounds that are difficult for many people to digest.

b)Laryngeal polyps sometimes disappear without treatment.

c)Laryngeal polyps cause a change in body chemistry that blocks the absorption of calcium.

d)Fresh vegetables are not always available in all seasons.

e)Low levels of calcium can sometimes be remedied with vitamin pills.
Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2009
Posts: 175
WE: Design (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 51 [1] , given: 69

### Show Tags

05 Aug 2011, 11:34
1
KUDOS
carcass wrote:
thangvietnam wrote:
C declares that poly causes low calcium and weakening. C is typical causal weakener. if argument said that X creates Y, weakener can say Y creates X.
B a weakener of the type no x but y still exist.

D is correct.

the book CRITICAL REASONING BIBLE is wonderful for this causal relation.

EXCEPT question required you to read well but contains no trick answer choice and so never be 700 level question.

I agree for D

The argument says dairy and green, leafy vegetables so even if vegetables are not available the argument does not say anything about dairy.....
I think C is a better option.
_________________

Kaustubh

Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2011
Posts: 85
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 34 [1] , given: 15

Re: Researchers have noticed that people whose blood shows [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2013, 23:38
1
KUDOS
navigator123 wrote:
I am wondering how the OA -
[Reveal] Spoiler:
C
could be correct???
In the Stimulus, the researchers are discussing ways to reduce the risk (i.e preventing the disease than curing the disease), but the OA provides after effects of the disease than preventing. Isn't something wrong with the OA.

Hi navigator123,

The stimulus says that low calcium causes laryngeal polyps (low calcium -> laryngeal polyps)
but if we can prove that relation b/w cause and effect are in opposite way i.e. if we prove that (laryngeal polyps -> low calcium) then the researcher's reccomendation will not be effective.
_________________

Kudos always encourages me

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 340
Location: Washington DC
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2006, 21:33
I think it is C
VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1134
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2006, 21:43
One more for C.
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 376
Location: Phoenix AZ
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2006, 21:45
what if i highlight "prevent" in the question.
VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1134
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2006, 21:52
mailtheguru wrote:
what if i highlight "prevent" in the question.

I know...I know...I saw that. But the others just seemed so far away from the scope....
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 330
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2006, 22:06
Yes it is still (C).The low levels of calcium is because the disease does not allow the body to absorb calcium.

This is a cause-effect type of question where the cause and effect roles have been reversed.

Low levels of calcium-----Disease.(according to question)

But (C) says Disease-----Low levels of calcium
_________________

A well-balanced person is one who has a drink in each of his hands.

Director
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 528
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2006, 00:04
Straight C.
VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1025
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2006, 06:28
yeah..will go with C. Good catch Sangarelli
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 281
Location: New York
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2006, 06:36
Good explanation Sangarelli.

I was also caught with the reasoning as the statement says eating foods such as dairy and green, leafy vegetables will PREVENT polyps and C assumes that the individuals already HAS the disease.
VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1172
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 148 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2006, 06:42
C 2
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 382
Location: TX
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2006, 08:56
Joining the C gang.
Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 83
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2006, 19:10
Me too ... C it is! For the same reason as stated by Sangarelli - cause/effect scenario
_________________

Try and try until you succeed! There is just no giving up!

Director
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 714
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2006, 08:29
Good one C
Intern
Joined: 28 Jun 2006
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2006, 11:22
I don't like C either, because of the word "prevent" in the question.

On the other hand, A is the only other answer that remotely tries to respond to the question.

The polyps blocking absorption of calcium doesn't weaken the argument that a diet high in calcium might prevent the polyps because if you already have the polyps, why are you trying to prevent them?

The disease inhibiting you from using the prevention doesn't make any sense as you can't prevent something that has already happened.

I hate to have a dissenting opinion as so many other people have already guessed C, but I still have a funny feeling about it.
Director
Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 580
Location: France
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2006, 11:30
I go straight to A. But this SC doesn't seem to be of gmat level.
Intern
Joined: 28 Jun 2006
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2006, 12:46
I just think that this is a case of a poorly worded question if C is the correct answer. Suggesting that calcium won't cure the disease (as C indicates) doesn't weaken an argument that calcium might prevent the disease. Curing and prevention are two completely different and many times unrelated issues.

They say that drinking coffee might lower the risk of colon cancer, but I'm pretty sure that drinking coffee won't cure those who already suffer from colon cancer. So does that mean that the argument for preventing cancer is weakened or invalidated? I don't think so.

I'll step off of my soapbox now.
10 Oct 2006, 12:46

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 48 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of 18 27 Aug 2009, 05:22
A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of 8 03 Nov 2008, 13:22
A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of 3 06 Jun 2008, 06:46
87 A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of 27 04 Jun 2008, 23:06
A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of 7 27 May 2007, 10:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by