Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 12 Jul 2014, 20:58

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Resident: Residents of this locale should not consider their

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Apr 2004
Posts: 157
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Resident: Residents of this locale should not consider their [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2005, 05:50
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
Resident: Residents of this locale should not consider
their loss of farming as a way of life to be a
tragedy. When this area was a rural area it was
economically depressed, but it is now a growing
bastion of high-tech industry with high-wage
jobs, and supports over 20 times the number of
jobs it did then.

Which one of the following, if true, does the most to
justify the conclusion of the residentтАЩs argument?
(A) Farming is becoming increasingly efficient, with
the result that fewer farms are required to
produce the same amount of food.
(B) The development of high-tech industry is more
valuable to national security than is farming.
(C) Residents of this locale do not value a rural way
of life more than they value economic
prosperity.
(D) Many residents of this locale have annual
incomes that are twice what they were when
the locale was primarily agricultural.
(E) The loss of a family farm is often perceived as
tragic even when no financial hardship results.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2005
Posts: 42
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2005, 05:56
I will go with D.
The rural area was economically depressed but not any more.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1743
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2005, 06:01
yup D it is.
_________________

hey ya......

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 998
Location: South Korea
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2005, 06:10
Clearly (D)
_________________

Auge um Auge, Zahn um Zahn :twisted: !

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2005
Posts: 244
Schools: Cranfield SOM
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: Cr: farming [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2005, 06:14
ronybtl wrote:
Resident: Residents of this locale should not consider
their loss of farming as a way of life to be a
tragedy. When this area was a rural area it was
economically depressed, but it is now a growing
bastion of high-tech industry with high-wage
jobs, and supports over 20 times the number of
jobs it did then.

Which one of the following, if true, does the most to
justify the conclusion of the residentтАЩs argument?
(A) Farming is becoming increasingly efficient, with
the result that fewer farms are required to
produce the same amount of food.
(B) The development of high-tech industry is more
valuable to national security than is farming.
(C) Residents of this locale do not value a rural way
of life more than they value economic
prosperity.
(D) Many residents of this locale have annual
incomes that are twice what they were when
the locale was primarily agricultural.
(E) The loss of a family farm is often perceived as
tragic even when no financial hardship results.


Answer is D - This is the only evidence that strengthens the conclusion that the residents need not consider loss of farming .....
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 595
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2005, 16:09
C for me. The argument is based in the assumption that what farmers consider more important money than any other thing. If this is not true, the argument can not be valid. My choice is C.

OA plz
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 1128
Location: London, UK
Schools: Tuck'08
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2005, 17:45
Agree with C too

you need to make the link between the fact that people should not consider their loss of farming as a way of life to be a tragedy AND the financial examples given by the resident.

they can only accept this argument if they don't feel that the loss of the rural way of life is more important or valuable than the financial interests.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 405
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2005, 19:43
a) weakens the argument
b) Out of scope
c) Out of scope
d) Money!
e) Out of scope

The best answer is D.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 503
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2005, 22:30
D is the correct answer.
Reason: Economically depressed... and the income now is twice the agricultural income.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Posts: 233
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2005, 04:19
go C go...
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1493
Location: Germany
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2005, 05:07
C)...

what would justify the conclusion ? a piece of evidence that would show that the economic success of the area leads to the attitude of the residents that their life is not a tragedy due to the loss of farming. so we have to show that economic success means no tragedy. C) says that for the residents the economic values are at least as important as the rural way of life. fact is that the economy in xyz prospers. thats very important for the farmers and equally, if not more, important than the rural way of life.

D) should be out b/c its possible that the area prospers but the farmers still see their life as a tragedy b/c they dont care about the economy. they only care about their rural way of life...
_________________

If your mind can conceive it and your heart can believe it, have faith that you can achieve it.

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5253
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2005, 05:40
Focus on the resident`s conclusion: Residents of this locale should not consider their loss of farming as a way of life to be a tragedy.

What strengthens this argument?

D is a trap answer centered around a scope shift. Extra money does not necessarily justify the change as a betterment for all people!

My wager is on C. (perhaps many people were forced to adopt the new industry and change in a way of life)
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 503
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2005, 07:06
What is the OA plz.. and the OE too...
Great going guyzz.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Apr 2004
Posts: 157
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2005, 07:50
OA is C.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1816
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2005, 10:02
This one was difficult for me but got C finally.
  [#permalink] 02 Nov 2005, 10:02
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic No resident of Country X should consider the loss of the garimavyas 4 13 May 2011, 23:58
2 No resident of Country X should consider the loss of the gmatpapa 3 13 Jan 2011, 20:39
Residents of an apartment complex are considering two sher676 1 20 Aug 2009, 13:34
Residents of an apartment complex are considering two prasannar 2 16 Mar 2008, 07:20
Residents of an apartment complex are considering two keyV 6 20 Oct 2004, 22:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Resident: Residents of this locale should not consider their

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.