Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Sep 2014, 12:03

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Resolve/explain

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 May 2005
Posts: 81
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Resolve/explain [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2007, 18:03
The oil wells of Barlandia produced so much oil that the market was overwhelmed; consumption did not keep pace with production. As a result, oil prices fell. The government of Barlandia attempted to support oil prices through a subsidy scheme: oil producers who voluntarily limited the amount of oil they produced were compensated directly by the government up to a specified maximum payment.

The program instituted by the government of Barlandia, if successful, will not be a net cost to the government. Which of the following, if true, is the best basis for an explanation of how this could be true?


a) Depressed oil prices meant operating losses for oil producers, decreasing the income of oil producers, and thus decreasing the taxes paid to the government by oil producers.

b) Oil production in countries other than Barlandia declined in the same year that Barlandia's government instituted the compensatory scheme.

c) In the first quarter after Barlandia's government instituted the compensatory scheme, oil production declined 8 percent.

d) Because the government specified a maximum subsidy payment per oil producer, those producers with numerous wells in production received less support per well than those producers with fewer wells in production.

e) Oil producers desiring to qualify for the compensatory scheme could not continue to produce oil and simply withhold it from the market.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 899
Schools: University of Chicago, Wharton School
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 7

Re: Resolve/explain [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2007, 19:27
above720 wrote:
The oil wells of Barlandia produced so much oil that the market was overwhelmed; consumption did not keep pace with production. As a result, oil prices fell. The government of Barlandia attempted to support oil prices through a subsidy scheme: oil producers who voluntarily limited the amount of oil they produced were compensated directly by the government up to a specified maximum payment.

The program instituted by the government of Barlandia, if successful, will not be a net cost to the government. Which of the following, if true, is the best basis for an explanation of how this could be true?


a) Depressed oil prices meant operating losses for oil producers, decreasing the income of oil producers, and thus decreasing the taxes paid to the government by oil producers.

b) Oil production in countries other than Barlandia declined in the same year that Barlandia's government instituted the compensatory scheme.

c) In the first quarter after Barlandia's government instituted the compensatory scheme, oil production declined 8 percent.

d) Because the government specified a maximum subsidy payment per oil producer, those producers with numerous wells in production received less support per well than those producers with fewer wells in production.

e) Oil producers desiring to qualify for the compensatory scheme could not continue to produce oil and simply withhold it from the market.



D. not very much clear but should be D.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1467
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 0

Re: Resolve/explain [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2007, 19:31
above720 wrote:
The oil wells of Barlandia produced so much oil that the market was overwhelmed; consumption did not keep pace with production. As a result, oil prices fell. The government of Barlandia attempted to support oil prices through a subsidy scheme: oil producers who voluntarily limited the amount of oil they produced were compensated directly by the government up to a specified maximum payment.

The program instituted by the government of Barlandia, if successful, will not be a net cost to the government. Which of the following, if true, is the best basis for an explanation of how this could be true?


a) Depressed oil prices meant operating losses for oil producers, decreasing the income of oil producers, and thus decreasing the taxes paid to the government by oil producers.

b) Oil production in countries other than Barlandia declined in the same year that Barlandia's government instituted the compensatory scheme.

c) In the first quarter after Barlandia's government instituted the compensatory scheme, oil production declined 8 percent.

d) Because the government specified a maximum subsidy payment per oil producer, those producers with numerous wells in production received less support per well than those producers with fewer wells in production.

e) Oil producers desiring to qualify for the compensatory scheme could not continue to produce oil and simply withhold it from the market.


Clear A.

The argument is talking about government "net cost". If you look at the question, the answer should be that the government would have somehow get replacement for the money they spend.

In A, the government will get money back because they will get the tax from the oil producer's income.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2006
Posts: 45
Location: Seoul
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

[#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2007, 04:47
Think this is the only argument that explains howgovernment will compensate for expances related to subsidies.
_________________

brainstorm

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 385
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2007, 09:30
D is better than A
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 48
Schools: Olin
GMAT 1: Q V
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2007, 10:27
Must be A

If government pays fixed amount to everyone than oilproducers with many oil wells is going to recieve less amount irrespective of their production capacity. So that tax will be less than whatever ideally the tax should have been generated,
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 145
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2007, 13:15
A.
  [#permalink] 24 Aug 2007, 13:15
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Experts publish their posts in the topic Resolve/Explain Question - Bus Connections BeckyRobinsonTPR 6 01 Jul 2013, 17:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Resolve/explain

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.