BeckyRobinsonTPR wrote:
Passenger boardings on busses almost doubled between 1995 and 2005, yet the actual number of trips made by passengers increased by only 38 percent over the same period. The reason for this discrepancy is that a new boarding is counted each time a passenger must make a connection in order to reach their final destination.
Which of the following, if true, best helps explain why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of bus trips between 1995 and 2005?
A) Between 1995 and 2005, the number of bus stops increased dramatically.
B) Between 1995 and 2005, the total distance of the average bus trip increased significantly.
C) Between 1995 and 2005, the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make a connection en route to their final destinations increased significantly.
D) The proportion of business travelers using busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005 relative to the proportion of pleasure travelers.
E) The average seating capacity of busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005.
First of all, thanks BeckyRobinsonTPR for a question.
This question is just difficult for those who don't understand the terms provided in the stimulus. But, that's not a logic of GMAC who focus on the logic (even when you don't understand what do terms mean). If you read the question more than 1 time, I bet you can see the pattern quite clearly.
ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:Fact: Boarding passes doubled between 1995 to 2005
Fact: But, number of trips only increased 38%
Fact: The reason for that is: boarding pass is counted each time for each connection to the final destination.
Question: explain why the increase in boardings exceeded the increase in the number of trips.You can see
the answer actually lies on the stimulus. Because boarding pass is counted each time for each connection to the final destination. It doesn't matter how much proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make a connection en route, the boarding pass counts must increase at least 38% because of new boarding pass counting system (actually mentioned in the stimulus).
Even a small increase of the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make a connection ==> will make the number of boarding passes increase.==> You just need to pick an option that talks about "increase of connection to final destination".
ANALYZE EACH ANSWER: A) Between 1995 and 2005, the number of bus stops increased dramatically.
Wrong. "Number of bus tops"
differs from "number of connections"
B) Between 1995 and 2005, the total distance of the average bus trip increased significantly.
Wrong. Out of scope. "total distance" is not relevant to "increase of number of boarding passes"
C) Between 1995 and 2005, the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make a connection en route to their final destinations increased significantly.
Correct. As mentioned above, the boarding pass counts must increase at least 38% because of new boarding pass counting system (actually mentioned in the stimulus). Even the small increase of the proportion of bus trips requiring passengers to make a connection ==> will make the number of boarding passes increase.
D) The proportion of business travelers using busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005 relative to the proportion of pleasure travelers.
Wrong. Out of scope. Nothing about the proportion of "business travelers" vs "pleasure travelers".
E) The average seating capacity of busses increased significantly between 1995 and 2005.
Wrong. Out of scope. "seating capacity" does not help to explain why number of boarding passes increased more than that of bus trip.
Hope it's clear.