Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 27 Sep 2016, 08:59
GMAT Club Tests

Happening Now:

Live Chat with Tuck Adcoms - Join the Chat Room to Attend this Event and Chat with Adcoms.


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Restorers say that if allowed to remove and replace the disc

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 841
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
Followers: 54

Kudos [?]: 1153 [1] , given: 197

GMAT ToolKit User
Restorers say that if allowed to remove and replace the disc [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jul 2013, 13:02
1
This post received
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

66% (01:32) correct 34% (00:42) wrong based on 357 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Restorers say that if allowed to remove and replace the discolored layer of varnish on the Mona Lisa, the colors Leonardo da Vinci painted nearly five hundred years ago will once again shine through.

A. If
B. if it is
C. if they are
D. when
E. when it is
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...



GMAT RCs VOCABULARY LIST: http://gmatclub.com/forum/vocabulary-list-for-gmat-reading-comprehension-155228.html
learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-analytical-writing-assessment
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APt9ITygGss


Last edited by blueseas on 15 Jul 2013, 01:55, edited 1 time in total.
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Expert
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 1408
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Followers: 214

Kudos [?]: 844 [1] , given: 19

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Restorers say that if allowed to remove and replace the disc [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 May 2016, 15:02
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
thuyduong91vnu wrote:
Hi,

Could someone help with this one, why could not B - "If it is" be correct answer? I mean, why could not we use "It is" in the same way as "It is easy/difficult/essential to...", in which cases "it" does not really have any antecedent?

Thanks for helping me :)


Grammatically the sentence would be correct, but the meaning would be wrong. The sentence would mean that if it is generally (by law) allowed.
However the original meaning is if the restorers are allowed.
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Expert
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 1408
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Followers: 214

Kudos [?]: 844 [1] , given: 19

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Restorers say that if allowed to remove and replace the disc [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 May 2016, 10:03
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
thuyduong91vnu wrote:
Hi sayantanc2k,

Thanks for your response :-) I have one more question for this, how can we determine which one is the original meaning when both choices are grammatically correct? Is it because in common sense we do not consider the removement and replacement are illegal actions, or are there any other reasons for this?

Thanks for helping me!


I find your query difficult to answer since in general it is not required to use external knowledge to answer a GMAT SC question - let me try to explain in this way:

Consider this sentence:

" If I am allowed to play, our team will win"

The above sentence automatically means that if I am allowed to play, I WILL play.

Now consider the following:

" If it is allowed for me to play, our team would win"

This sentence is slightly awkward because this sentence does not convey the meaning that I would play - it just states that there is no bar against my playing.

I am not sure whether I could explain the difference, but this is the best I could try.
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3410
Followers: 1162

Kudos [?]: 5133 [1] , given: 54

Restorers say that if allowed to remove and replace the disc [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Sep 2016, 14:06
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
RichaChampion wrote:
Restorers say that if allowed to remove and replace the discolored layer of varnish on the Mona Lisa, the colors Leonardo da Vinci painted nearly five hundred years ago will once again shine through.

A. If
B. if it is
C. if they are
D. when
E. when it is

If ____ then ______

Mike Mc Garry Sir based on the wisdom that you gave me here.

Clause after If is a Subordinate Clause
Clause after then is an Independent Clause.

In Option A we need a full clause i.e. S-V pair and that is not happening in that option, therefore, Option A is wrong.
Options B & C have a full clause after If, but In option B it doesn't agree in number with the plural subject restorers, thus, C is correct.

P.S. GMAT Prep Question
OA: C

They have used a split when, can you guide me how is when used in D and E and what is the similarity between If__then__ and when that they have created this split.

Dear RichaChampion,
I'm happy to respond. :-) My Magoosh job affords me a little time to attend to GMAT Club.

The word "if" is a subordinate conjunction, a word that begins a subordinate clause. It must have a full clause after it, BUT sometimes that clause can be implied rather than explicitly stated. Thus, technically, (A) is not grammatically wrong, because it implies the subject/verb pair (... say that if [they are] allowed to ....). It is simply too casual. It doesn't sound formal.

You are correct that (B) change the number, and (C) of course is correct.

(D)-(E) contain the "when" split about which you are asking.

The word "when" is another subordinate conjunction. The difference is in connotation. Consider these two statements.
1) I will give my sister a gift if she visits me.
2) I will give my sister a gift when she visits me.
These are both grammatically correct but have different connotations. The first implies that the visit of my sister is uncertain: she may or may not visit, and I don't know which will happen. If she does visit, then I have a gift for her, but it's not clear at all what will happen to this gift if my sister doesn't visit. Statement #1 is a statement full of uncertainty about how the future will play out.
By contrast, in #2, we confidently can infer two separate facts about the future. It is confidently asserted that my sister will visit: that is not in doubt. It is also confidently assert that, when she is here, I will give her a gift: that is not in doubt either. Statement #2 is a statement of crystal clear certainty.

In much the same way, (A)-(C) imply that we do not know whether the restorers will be "allowed to remove and replace the discolored layer of varnish on the Mona Lisa." There is uncertainty about the future in the "if" construction. The restorers may or may not ever receive this permission, and these changes to the painting may or may not ever take place. We have no idea how it will turn out. Nothing in sentence gives us any insight into how things will unfold.

The "when" construction in (D)-(E) replace the uncertainty with utter certainty. This version implies that we know for a fact that the restorer will be allowed at some point to make these changes, and that the painting definitely will be changed in the manner described. This is a HUGE change in meaning, a change from uncertainty about the future to complete certainty about it.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1153
Location: United States
Followers: 243

Kudos [?]: 2632 [0], given: 123

Premium Member
Re: Restorers say that if allowed to remove and replace the disc [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jul 2013, 16:27
shaileshmishra wrote:
Restorers say that if allowed to remove and replace the discolored layer of varnish on the Mona Lisa, the colors Leonardo da Vinci painted nearly five hundred years ago will once again shine through.


A. If ==> No doer
B. if it is
C. if they are
D. when ==> No doer
E. when it is


[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA TO FOLLOW


Firs split: S-V agreement.
who is allowed to remove and replace.....? Clearly, the restorers (plural). So B, E are out immediately because of "it".

Second split: Meaning
D and A have same problem, they do not show the doer? Who is allowed to remove and replace? The restorers or someone else?

IMO, C is correct, it tells us the doer-the restorers very clearly.

Waiting for OA.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 1440
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.35
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 290

Kudos [?]: 1212 [0], given: 816

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Restorers say that if allowed to remove and replace the disc [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jul 2013, 23:07
I think it should be C as some one is required to remove and replace the colours and C provides us with the same ... hence C
_________________

ISB Class of 2017 | ISB Preparation Kit
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ISB Class of 2016 | GMAT Retake Debrief
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ISB Class of 2015 | GMAT Debrief
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 9808
Followers: 839

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Restorers say that if allowed to remove and replace the disc [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Dec 2014, 13:34
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Fuqua Thread Master
User avatar
Joined: 28 Nov 2014
Posts: 513
Concentration: Strategy
Schools: Duke '19, Foster '19
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 40

CAT Tests
Re: Restorers say that if allowed to remove and replace the disc [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jan 2015, 14:04
My take : C

their should be a doer responsible for replacing and removing the discoloured layer of varnish.

"they" in C clearly refers to 'restorers'
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3605
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 621

Kudos [?]: 4881 [0], given: 321

Re: Restorers say that if allowed to remove and replace the disc [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2016, 11:32
This is a ‘first conditional’ topic with an ‘if clause’ that is in present tense followed by the main clause that is in the simple future. However, the catch is that there should be an ‘if clause’ with a verb and not an ‘if phrase’ with an Ed modifier.
That is the reason, A and D are out. B and E have SV error. Finally, therefore, C remains.
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Expert Post
Economist GMAT Tutor Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 03 Sep 2015
Posts: 50
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

Re: Restorers say that if allowed to remove and replace the disc [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2016, 12:54
The sentence as written contains a dangling modifier, so beloved of the test makers. The structure is “… if allowed…., the colors…”. In the part of the sentence before the comma there is no mention of who or what is allowed. “Restorers” are allowed. You could correct the sentence by placing “restorers” or a pronoun to refer to them, such as “they”, immediately after the comma. The other way to correct the sentence, as has been done here, is to mention “they” in the first part of the sentence.
_________________

Economist GMAT Tutor
Claim your completely free, full-access trial: http://econgm.at/GMATFreeTrial
Follow us @econtestprep
Contact us at (866) 292-0660 or support@gmat.economist.com

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Nov 2015
Posts: 26
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 107

Re: Restorers say that if allowed to remove and replace the disc [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 May 2016, 08:34
Hi,

Could someone help with this one, why could not B - "If it is" be correct answer? I mean, why could not we use "It is" in the same way as "It is easy/difficult/essential to...", in which cases "it" does not really have any antecedent?

Thanks for helping me :)
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Nov 2015
Posts: 26
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 107

Re: Restorers say that if allowed to remove and replace the disc [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 May 2016, 18:20
Hi sayantanc2k,

Thanks for your response :-) I have one more question for this, how can we determine which one is the original meaning when both choices are grammatically correct? Is it because in common sense we do not consider the removement and replacement are illegal actions, or are there any other reasons for this?

Thanks for helping me!
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1337
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 772

Re: Restorers say that if allowed to remove and replace the disc [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Sep 2016, 20:53
blueseas wrote:
Restorers say that if allowed to remove and replace the discolored layer of varnish on the Mona Lisa, the colors Leonardo da Vinci painted nearly five hundred years ago will once again shine through.

A. If
B. if it is
C. if they are
D. when
E. when it is


beautifull question.

in this phrase: if allowed ... the collors.....through

"if allowed" refer/modifies the subject of main clause, "collors" grammatically. So, this modification is not logic. if we realize the grammatical role of "if allowed", the problem become simple.

we have to realize grammatical role of each phrase in the original sentence before we justify whether these grammatical roles are logic.

we do not need a time relation here. so, "when" is not logic. we need a condition relation. "if ' is better.
Re: Restorers say that if allowed to remove and replace the disc   [#permalink] 08 Sep 2016, 20:53
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
To restore fishing grounds damaged by pollution paidlukkha 2 15 Aug 2016, 09:47
------------ removed ------------ accincognito 3 04 Oct 2013, 07:30
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Many scientists say that attempts to remove GMATPill 1 11 Aug 2013, 18:06
the attachment has been removed dineshyamato 1 22 Mar 2013, 20:46
SC was removed? 144144 1 24 Sep 2011, 16:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Restorers say that if allowed to remove and replace the disc

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.