Review of Jeff Sackmann's Math Sets : GMAT Quantitative Section - Page 2
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 10 Dec 2016, 06:09

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Review of Jeff Sackmann's Math Sets

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Current Student
Joined: 10 Aug 2009
Posts: 67
Location: United States (AL)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 600 Q43 V30
GMAT 2: 640 Q41 V36
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 45

Re: Review of Jeff Sackmann's Math Sets [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Apr 2012, 06:48
How do you feel that Sackmann's challenge set compares to GMAT Club Math tests. I have his entire challenge set, and I'm considering buying the Gmat Club tests. Any insights into how the two sets compare for someone in the 43/44 Q range.
_________________

"Popular opinion is the greatest lie in the world"-Thomas Carlyle

Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 131
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GMAT 2: 720 Q48 V40
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 182 [0], given: 23

Re: Review of Jeff Sackmann's Math Sets [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Apr 2012, 07:41
Bigred2008 wrote:
How do you feel that Sackmann's challenge set compares to GMAT Club Math tests. I have his entire challenge set, and I'm considering buying the Gmat Club tests. Any insights into how the two sets compare for someone in the 43/44 Q range.

Imo you should really focus on the basics in your stage of preperation. At those quant score levels you usually still have some deficits in the basics and by strengthening those you can boost your score up to 47-48. Sackman's sets helped me do that, I think they're excellent for that.
Current Student
Joined: 10 Aug 2009
Posts: 67
Location: United States (AL)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 600 Q43 V30
GMAT 2: 640 Q41 V36
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 45

Re: Review of Jeff Sackmann's Math Sets [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Apr 2012, 07:56
Quote:
Imo you should really focus on the basics in your stage of preperation. At those quant score levels you usually still have some deficits in the basics and by strengthening those you can boost your score up to 47-48. Sackman's sets helped me do that, I think they're excellent for that.

So do you think Sachmann Challenge Sets--> Gmat Club Math Tests in that order should suffice?
_________________

"Popular opinion is the greatest lie in the world"-Thomas Carlyle

SVP
Affiliations: HEC
Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 1637
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V44
Followers: 99

Kudos [?]: 621 [0], given: 432

Re: Review of Jeff Sackmann's Math Sets [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Apr 2012, 09:32
Bigred2008 wrote:
So do you think Sachmann Challenge Sets--> Gmat Club Math Tests in that order should suffice?

GMATClub tests are more difficult than Sackmann's material. So save the GMATClub tests for last.
_________________
Director
Status: Enjoying the GMAT journey....
Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Posts: 735
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V24
Followers: 71

Kudos [?]: 499 [0], given: 264

Re: Review of Jeff Sackmann's Math Sets [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Apr 2012, 10:01
bmillan01 wrote:
Bigred2008 wrote:
So do you think Sachmann Challenge Sets--> Gmat Club Math Tests in that order should suffice?

GMATClub tests are more difficult than Sackmann's material. So save the GMATClub tests for last.

I second bmillan01.
The club tests and Bunnel's signatures are the hardest good quality test material so it's better to do them when one is at his or her peak.
Also, If you are scoring around 43, then it's time to identify the concepts you have problem in. You must revisit theory books( such as mgmat) to understand those concepts better and thereafter do a lot of problems of all level( you may use the gmatclub latest level wise distribution), Rinse and repeat for other topics.
After doing so, i am sure your score will minimum jump to 47/48 and that would be the right time to dig into Jeff's challenge sets and followed by gmatclub tests. I've mentioned that in my signatures below.
Regards
_________________

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.

A WAY TO INCREASE FROM QUANT 35-40 TO 47 : http://gmatclub.com/forum/a-way-to-increase-from-q35-40-to-q-138750.html

Q 47/48 To Q 50 + http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-final-climb-quest-for-q-50-from-q47-129441.html#p1064367

Three good RC strategies http://gmatclub.com/forum/three-different-strategies-for-attacking-rc-127287.html

Manager
Joined: 24 Mar 2013
Posts: 63
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 10

Re: Review of Jeff Sackmann's Math Sets [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2014, 00:14
I am finding about 1 error in every 30 questions in the Sackmann sets. Not entirely impressed with them. I also get the feeling that a lot of these questions are sourced from gmat practice exams etc., with numbers changed slightly etc.
Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Posts: 189
Location: United States (NY)
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V40
GMAT 3: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.16
WE: Consulting (Venture Capital)
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 71

Re: Review of Jeff Sackmann's Math Sets [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 May 2014, 21:52
gmat club's quant questions are definitely harder than sackmann extreme set's
_________________
Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2015
Posts: 127
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 43

Review of Jeff Sackmann's Math Sets [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Mar 2015, 13:14
Professor5180 wrote:
I use Manahattan Gmat materials, and have gone through all the basic sections of the Numbers Properties, FDP, and Equations guides, including the end-of-chapter problems. I want to do Sackmens fundamentals and then hit OG part 1 questions, then move to the Advanced section and finish OG part 2. After that, I will try the challenge sets and extreme challenge sets. (That's gonna be a war!) I find I am not that off from alot of answers I get wrong, all it takes is one tiny error, I just need to sharpen up.

This might sound a tad stupid, but when you refer to OG "difficulties" - is this a feature Sackmen offers? I mean, if its the OG - what do you mean by these sections? I just have one book, with one area called "Problem Solving" and one with "Data Suffiency", no specific level arrangement
Intern
Joined: 18 Aug 2015
Posts: 2
Location: Mexico
Concentration: Finance, Economics
WE: Analyst (Investment Banking)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 18

Re: Review of Jeff Sackmann's Math Sets [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Mar 2016, 10:42
I bought all the 1800 problems and I can honestly say I do not recommend this material. The questions are lower level than the author said, plus it's full of mistakes. Not only typos but some answers are wrong. Others say one thing and at the end of the explanation say an other. Other questions are poorly structured.

I wrote to the author to point out some of this mistakes and there has been no reply so that made me realize this is old material that has not had any more work put in to update it.

I would not recommend this.

Posted from my mobile device
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Mar 2016
Posts: 414
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.8
WE: Operations (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 197

Re: Review of Jeff Sackmann's Math Sets [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2016, 03:50
Diegomcl , I too bought them recently. I think the "low-level" questions are part of the 7 PDF files forming part of "Fundamental" series while others are of Challenge category. I have worked through 3 Fundamentals so far as part of my revision. I think they are pretty good. The advantage is that it makes you accustomed to a variety of problems so that your speed and accuracy increases. First solve all 1800 and then solve all GMATCLUB test problems while reading explanations of the difficult ones can make one a GMAT Quant Whiz in my opinion
.
For Verbal, though, I have not found anything than the official materials to be of high quality. So for the purpose of practice Verbal = Only Official!
Re: Review of Jeff Sackmann's Math Sets   [#permalink] 07 Jun 2016, 03:50

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 30 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Jeff Sackmann Extreme Challenge set 1 29 Nov 2015, 23:15
Total Gmat math by jeff sackmann 3 20 Oct 2014, 04:09
1 Difficulty of Jeff Sackmann's Challenge Sets 5 29 Oct 2012, 06:53
Jeff Sackmann's Quant sets vs. Total GMAT Math 2 25 May 2011, 14:04
15 Total GMAT Math - Jeff Sackmann 45 15 Nov 2009, 16:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Review of Jeff Sackmann's Math Sets

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.