Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 11:26

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2004
Posts: 120
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2004, 12:15
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (02:08) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of the Maya as an achievement, the army of terra-cotta warriors created to protect Qin Shi Huang, China's first emperor, in his afterlife is more than 2000 years old and took 700,000 artisans more than 36yrs to comeplete them

a. same
b. took 700,000 artisans more than 36 yrs to complete it
c. took 700,000 artisans more than 36 yrs to complete
d. 700,000 artisans took more than 36 yrs to complte
e. to complete them too 700,000 ..bla bla bs
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 97
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2004, 12:34
B is the best answer. You can remove all the extraneous information and summarize the correction sentence to:

"The army of terra-cotta warriors took 700K partisans more than 36 years to complete it."

The other option might have been the one which leaves it out. However, compare the following:

(1) The city bridge took 5 years to complete.

(2) The city bridge took the municipal employees 5 years to complete it.

Our situation falls into category (2).

In colloquial terms, it may be okay to omit the it at the end, but, in formal/written language, you'd almost always have to keep it. Since you've introduced a new subject (partisans) in the sentence, a transitive verb for this subject (complete) should be rounded off with a proper object (it).

BTW, I'm assuming that the "army of terra-cota warriors" is a structure.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2004
Posts: 120
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2004, 12:43
oa is B.. good job on the explanation

thanks!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Apr 2004
Posts: 224
Location: Utrecht
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2004, 12:43
I agree that B is the answer.

I would use "it" too based on that it took 700 artisans to complet it.

Regards,

Alex
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1120
Location: United States
Followers: 136

Kudos [?]: 1379 [0], given: 122

Re: Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of [#permalink] New post 25 Aug 2013, 09:47
2013gmat wrote:
Hi, can you explain why a is correct ?
i reject it because of the bold phrase(highlighted)


Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of the Maya s an achievement, the army of terra-cotta warriors created to protect Qin Shi Huang, China's first emperor, in his afterlife is more than 2,000 years old and took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete.

A. the army of terra-cotta warriors created to protect Qin Shi Huang, China's first emperor, in his afterlife is more than 2,000 years old and took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete.
Correct.
- The main subject is "the army of terra-cotta warriors" which is collective noun ==> singular.
- You do not need to repeat pronoun "it" after complete because it creates redundant error (X took 700,000 artisans more than 36 year to complete X) <== redundant.
- Other options commit to Modifier problem. Please see the beginning of the sentence. "Rivaling the pyramids.." what rivals the pyramids ==> Should be "the army of terra-cotta".

B. Qin Shi huang, China's first emperor, was protected in his afterlife by an army of terra-cotta warriors that was created more than 2,000 years ago by 700,000 artisans who took more than 36 years to complete it.
Wrong.
- Modifier problem: "Rivaling the pyramids.." what rivals the pyramids ==> Should be "the army of terra-cotta", NOT "Qin Shi Huang"
- "it" at the end is redundant. X (an army) that was created by Y who took more than 36 years to complete X <== "X" is not necessary.

C. it took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to create an army of terra-cotta warriors more than 2,000 years ago that would protect Qin Shi Huang, China's first emperor, in his afterlife.
Wrong.
- Modifier problem: "Rivaling the pyramids.." what rivals the pyramids ==> Should be "the army of terra-cotta", NOT "it".
- it took X 36 years to create Y (an army) more than 2000 years THAT would....... <== awkward.
- Misplace modifier "that".

D. more than 2,000 years ago, 700,000 artisans worked more than 36 years to create an army of terra-cotta warriors to protect Qin Shi Huang, China's first emperor, in his afterlife.
Wrong.
- Modifier problem: "Rivaling the pyramids.." what rivals the pyramids ==> Should be "the army of terra-cotta", NOT 700,000 artisans.

E. more than 36 years were needed to complete the army of terra-cotta warrios that 700,000 artisans created 2,000 years ago to protect Qin Shi huang, China's first emperor, in his afterlife.
Wrong.
- Modifier problem: "Rivaling the pyramids.." what rivals the pyramids ==> Should be "the army of terra-cotta", NOT "more than 36 years"

Hope it's clear.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.

Re: Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of   [#permalink] 25 Aug 2013, 09:47
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of noboru 5 27 Jul 2010, 07:13
Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of jerrywu 0 01 Sep 2006, 21:51
Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of 2times 0 01 Sep 2006, 21:51
Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of chunjuwu 21 30 Jan 2005, 04:07
Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of pb_india 4 16 Jan 2005, 19:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.