Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 May 2013, 16:40
Customize  |  Hide

Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2004
Posts: 121
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2004, 13:15
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of the Maya as an achievement, the army of terra-cotta warriors created to protect Qin Shi Huang, China's first emperor, in his afterlife is more than 2000 years old and took 700,000 artisans more than 36yrs to comeplete them

a. same
b. took 700,000 artisans more than 36 yrs to complete it
c. took 700,000 artisans more than 36 yrs to complete
d. 700,000 artisans took more than 36 yrs to complte
e. to complete them too 700,000 ..bla bla bs
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 97
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2004, 13:34
B is the best answer. You can remove all the extraneous information and summarize the correction sentence to:

"The army of terra-cotta warriors took 700K partisans more than 36 years to complete it."

The other option might have been the one which leaves it out. However, compare the following:

(1) The city bridge took 5 years to complete.

(2) The city bridge took the municipal employees 5 years to complete it.

Our situation falls into category (2).

In colloquial terms, it may be okay to omit the it at the end, but, in formal/written language, you'd almost always have to keep it. Since you've introduced a new subject (partisans) in the sentence, a transitive verb for this subject (complete) should be rounded off with a proper object (it).

BTW, I'm assuming that the "army of terra-cota warriors" is a structure.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2004
Posts: 121
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2004, 13:43
oa is B.. good job on the explanation

thanks!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2004
Posts: 224
Location: Utrecht
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2004, 13:43
I agree that B is the answer.

I would use "it" too based on that it took 700 artisans to complet it.

Regards,

Alex
  [#permalink] 06 Sep 2004, 13:43
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of pb_india 4 16 Jan 2005, 20:46
Popular new posts Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of chunjuwu 21 30 Jan 2005, 05:07
New posts Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of laxieqv 5 20 Jun 2006, 09:49
New posts Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of 2times 4 26 Aug 2006, 20:10
New posts Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of jerrywu 1 01 Sep 2006, 22:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.