gmatter0913 wrote:
Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of the Maya as an achievement,
the army of terra-cotta warriors created to protect Qin Shi Huang, China's first emperor, in his afterlife is more than 2,000 years old and took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete.(A) the army of terra-cotta warriors created to protect Qin Shi Huang, China's first emperor, in his afterlife is more than 2,000 years old and took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete.
(B) Qin Shi huang, China's first emperor, was protected in his afterlife by an army of terracotta warriors that was created more than 2,000 years ago by 700,000 artisans who took more than 36 years to complete it
(C) it took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to create an army of terra-cotta warriors more than 2,000 years ago that would protect Qin Shi Huang, China's first emperor, in his afterlife
(D) more than 2,000 years ago, 700,000 artisans worked more than 36 years to create an army of terra-cotta warriors to protect Qin Shi Huang, China's first emperor, in his afterlife
(E) more than 36 years were needed to complete the army of terra-cotta warriors that 700,000 artisans created 2,000 years ago to protect Qin Shi Huang, China's first emperor, in his afterlife
First GlanceThe very long underline signals likely Structure, Meaning, Modifier, or Parallelism issues.
Issues(1) Modifier: rivaling the pyramidsThe original sentence begins with a modifier:
Rivaling the pyramids or the cities as an achievement. The information is talking about something that has not yet been mentioned. What is the rivalling the pyramids?
The
pyramids of Egypt are works of art. What else in the sentence is a work of art or can be described as
an achievement?
An army of terra-cotta warriors makes sense and should be placed right after the comma, so the original sentence is fine. The other answers offer various other various other illogical options as the noun following the comma:
(B)
Qin Shi Huang (a person is not a work of art)
(C)
it (referring to how long the warriors took to make)
(D)
artisans (people are not works of art)
(E)
36 years (a length of time is not a work of art)
Eliminate answers (B), (C), (D), and (E) because each uses an illogical noun following the comma.
(2) MeaningThe sentence contains a lot of modifiers; the placement of some modifiers in answers (B) and (C) confuse the meaning.
In answer (B), the pronoun it refers to the
army, so that the sentence reads:
an army that was created by artisans who took 36 years to complete the army. This is an equivalent example: the cake that was created by the chef who spent 3 hours to make the cake. As though the second cake is a different cake!
The sequence of modifiers in answer (C) is confusing:
(C)
to create an army of warriors more than 2,000 years ago that would protect HuangWhat happened
more than 2,000 years ago? The army was
created. The
warriors didn’t just appear, nor were they
protected 2,000 years ago. The modifier should more clearly point to the action that occurred
more than 2,000 years ago. Further, the placement interrupts another noun and modifier pair:
the warriors (more than 2,000 years ago) that would protect Qin Shi Huang. The two halves not in parentheses should be right next to each other;
the warriors, not some
years ago, are the ones who
would protect Huang.
Eliminate answers (B) and (C) for confusing modifier placement.
The Correct AnswerCorrect answer
(A) is the only one that completes the opening modifier structure correctly:
rivaling the pyramids as an achievement, the army of warriors. Further, the placement of the many modifiers is logical.