Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 04 Sep 2015, 11:13
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Robots X, Y and Z each assemble components at their

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 393
Location: Boston, MA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Robots X, Y and Z each assemble components at their [#permalink] New post 12 Mar 2006, 12:09
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

Robots X, Y and Z each assemble components at their respective constant rates. If r(subx) is the ratio of robot X's constant rate to robot Z's constant rate and r(suby) is the ratio of robot Y's constant rate to robot Z's constant rate, is robot Z's constant rate the greatest of the three?

1) r(subx)<r(suby)
2) r(suby)<1
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 393
Location: Boston, MA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Mar 2006, 12:25
C is right. Is it right to deduce from the information that from:
Statement 1: x<z?
Statement 2: z>y?

I got thrown off multiplying both sides by z in Statement 2, thinking, What if z was negative, then the sign would be reversed and we don't know if z is neg or pos. BUT, robots cant have negative constant rates, now can they??
:oops:
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1706
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Mar 2006, 12:32
buckkitty wrote:
C is right. Is it right to deduce from the information that from:
Statement 1: x<z?
Statement 2: z>y?

I got thrown off multiplying both sides by z in Statement 2, thinking, What if z was negative, then the sign would be reversed and we don't know if z is neg or pos. BUT, robots cant have negative constant rates, now can they??
:oops:


You can deduce solution from the information provided.
In this case,

1. x/z < y/z: x<y but we can't say anything about z.
2. y/z < 1: It means, y < z. but we don't know anything about x

If we consider both,
y<z & x < y => z>y>x. z is the greatest.

Rate can't be negative here, since it is "rate of assembling components". But velocity of a vehicle (rate) can be negative.
  [#permalink] 12 Mar 2006, 12:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Robots X, Y and Z each assemble components at their

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.