Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Apr 2014, 02:31

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Roland: The alarming fact is that 90 percent of the-OG10#138

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Dec 2003
Posts: 214
Location: US
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Roland: The alarming fact is that 90 percent of the-OG10#138 [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2004, 10:51
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

75% (01:59) correct 25% (01:25) wrong based on 132 sessions
Roland: The alarming fact is that 90 percent of the people in this country now report that they know someone who is unemployed.

Sharon: But a normal, moderate level of unemployment is 5 percent, with 1 out of 20 workers unemployed. So at any given time if a person knows approximately 50 workers, 1 or more will very likely be unemployed.

Sharon's argument is structured to lead to which of the following as a conclusion?

(A) The fact that 90% of the people know someone who is unemployed is not an indication that unemployment is abnormally high.
(B) The current level of unemployment is not moderate.
(C) If at least 5% of workers are unemployed, the result of questioning a representative group of people cannot be the percentage Roland cites.
(D) It is unlikely that the people whose statements Roland cites are giving accurate reports.
(E) If an unemployment figure is given as a certain percent, the actual percentage of those without jobs is even higher.

Please explain your answer choice. Also, can anyone explain the conversation. i dont understand Sharon's reply.
thanks.

Note: There is another question (assumption question) which is based upon the same argument. For reading and further discussion on that question, please use the following link:
roland-the-alarming-fact-is-that-90-percent-of-the-og10-9618.html
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1818
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2004, 11:12
Between A and C I choose A.

Sharon's statement starts with "But....." from which we should infer that she is feeling that 90% is the unemployment rate, and then goes to give her justification.

why I feel C is not an answer because even if the statement about atleast 5% is correct even then the percentage which Roland gives is possible because few unempolyed will be known by many. This is not reflected in Sharon's argument.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 971
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - from OG [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2004, 20:23
let see if I understood it correctly.

5% unemployed = 5 out of 100
if a person knows 50 people, then probability is that 2.5 are unemployed (5%of 50).
thus, if we have a group of 10000 people(90%public who knows + workes)--> 500 are likely to be unemployed. 500 of 10000 is not big of an unemployment.

Sharon accepts the fact that 90% know someone who is unemployed, but that effect if nullified by 5% unemployement.

A it is.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 288
Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 75

Roland: The alarming fact is that 90 percent of the people [#permalink] New post 13 Dec 2012, 21:46
Roland: The alarming fact is that 90 percent of the people in this country now report that they know someone who is unemployed.

Sharon: But a normal, moderate level of unemployment is 5 percent, with 1 out of 20 workers unemployed. So at any given time if a person knows approximately 50 workers, 1 or more will very likely be unemployed.

Sharon's argument is structured to lead to which of the following as a conclusion?

(A) The fact that 90% of the people know someone who is unemployed is not an indication that unemployment is abnormally high.
(B) The current level of unemployment is not moderate.
(C) If at least 5% of workers are unemployed, the result of questioning a representative group of people cannot be the percentage Roland cites.
(D) It is unlikely that the people whose statements Roland cites are giving accurate reports.
(E) If an unemployment figure is given as a certain percent, the actual percentage of those without jobs is even higher.

Note : I have found explanation of question with same paragraph but with different question stem. Therefore, request experts to provide their answers with explanations
_________________

YOU CAN, IF YOU THINK YOU CAN

Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Preparing for the another shot...!
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1427
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 108

Kudos [?]: 489 [0], given: 62

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User Premium Member
Re: GMAT Prep Pack 1 -7580 [#permalink] New post 13 Dec 2012, 23:16
Expert's post
greatps24 wrote:
Roland: The alarming fact is that 90 percent of the people in this country now report that they know someone who is unemployed.

Sharon: But a normal, moderate level of unemployment is 5 percent, with 1 out of 20 workers unemployed. So at any given time if a person knows approximately 50 workers, 1 or more will very likely be unemployed.

Sharon's argument is structured to lead to which of the following as a conclusion?

(A) The fact that 90% of the people know someone who is unemployed is not an indication that unemployment is abnormally high.
(B) The current level of unemployment is not moderate.
(C) If at least 5% of workers are unemployed, the result of questioning a representative group of people cannot be the percentage Roland cites.
(D) It is unlikely that the people whose statements Roland cites are giving accurate reports.
(E) If an unemployment figure is given as a certain percent, the actual percentage of those without jobs is even higher.

Note : I have found explanation of question with same paragraph but with different question stem. Therefore, request experts to provide their answers with explanations


Here the "BUT" in Sharon's argument is the key.
It implies that Sharon accepts the stats presented by Roland but somehow doesn't agrees to the conclusion.
This can be clearly stated by A.
C is too extreme.
D provides some assurance of some other fact, which we can't predict.
B is irrelevant.
E- concludes something that is far from the fact stated. We can't predict about those "without jobs".

+1A

Please always name the topic with the starting words of the question .
_________________

Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified
Rules For Posting
www.Univ-Scholarships.com

1 KUDOS received
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1577
Followers: 1060

Kudos [?]: 2524 [1] , given: 164

GMAT Tests User
Re: Roland: The alarming fact [#permalink] New post 14 Dec 2012, 00:19
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
greatps24 wrote:
Roland: The alarming fact is that 90 percent of the people in this country now report that they know someone who is unemployed.

Sharon: But a normal, moderate level of unemployment is 5 percent, with 1 out of 20 workers unemployed. So at any given time if a person knows approximately 50 workers, 1 or more will very likely be unemployed.

Sharon's argument is structured to lead to which of the following as a conclusion?

(A) The fact that 90% of the people know someone who is unemployed is not an indication that unemployment is abnormally high.
(B) The current level of unemployment is not moderate.
(C) If at least 5% of workers are unemployed, the result of questioning a representative group of people cannot be the percentage Roland cites.
(D) It is unlikely that the people whose statements Roland cites are giving accurate reports.
(E) If an unemployment figure is given as a certain percent, the actual percentage of those without jobs is even higher.

Note : I have found explanation of question with same paragraph but with different question stem. Therefore, request experts to provide their answers with explanations


Hi,

Let's first understand the argument at hand:

Roland says that "The alarming fact is that a fact".

'A Fact' stands for the information that 90 percent of the people in this country now report that they know someone who is unemployed.

Now, there are two parts of Roland's statement. One (latter part) is a fact and the other ("The alarming fact") is a judgement.

Sharon's argument starts with a "But". It means she is either going to counter the judgment or the fact.

In this case, the statement of Sharon clearly does not counter the Roland's fact. It says that at a moderate level of employment, it is likely for people to know at least one person who is employed. So, basically, she counters the judgement of Roland which says that the fact presents some alarming information.

This is what is stated by Option A, which says that the fact doesn't imply that the unemployment is abnormally high (or alarmingly high).

Therefore, the correct choice is option A.

Let's look at other options:

Option C and D can be eliminated on the basis of our discussion. Sharon does not counter the fact cited by Roland.

Option B goes against the Sharon's statement while option E is completely irrelevant.

Critical Reasoning questions are also asked in the new IR section of GMAT. Click on the below image to access a critical reasoning IR question with detailed approach to such questions.

Image

Hope this helps :)

Thanks,
Chiranjeev
_________________

Free trial:Click here to start free trial (100+ free practice questions)
Free Session: September 14: Learn how to define your GMAT strategy, create your study plan and master the core skills to excel on the GMAT. Click here to attend.
ImageImageImageImage

Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Posts: 15
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 2
WE: Sales (Consumer Products)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: Roland: The alarming fact is that 90 percent of the people [#permalink] New post 29 Dec 2012, 02:48
it took me more than five minutes to affirm my choice - A. The question asks for a conclusion led by Sharon's argument. From the word 'but', we can say Sharon dosen't aggree with Roland's ' alarming facts'. Means Sharon doesn't think the fact is alarming.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 288
Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 75

Re: Roland: The alarming fact is that 90 percent of the people [#permalink] New post 22 Feb 2013, 01:28
Roland: The alarming fact is that 90 percent of the people in this country now report that they know someone who is unemployed.

Sharon: But a normal, moderate level of unemployment is 5 percent, with 1 out of 20 workers unemployed. So at any given time if a person knows approximately 50 workers, 1 or more will very likely be unemployed.

Sharon's argument is structured to lead to which of the following as a conclusion?

(A) The fact that 90% of the people know someone who is unemployed is not an indication that unemployment is abnormally high. Within the scope
(B) The current level of unemployment is not moderate. very generic statement
(C) If at least 5% of workers are unemployed, the result of questioning a representative group of people cannot be the percentage Roland cites. OFS
(D) It is unlikely that the people whose statements Roland cites are giving accurate reports. If Passage is true than what might be true (conclusion). So, we can't question the validity of premise
(E) If an unemployment figure is given as a certain percent, the actual percentage of those without jobs is even higher.
Passage do not mention about any figure
My 2nd attempt with PoE
_________________

YOU CAN, IF YOU THINK YOU CAN

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 453
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 134 [0], given: 70

Re: Roland: The alarming fact is that 90 percent of the-OG10#138 [#permalink] New post 21 Apr 2013, 00:43
All duplicate threads on this topic have been merged.

Please check and follow the Guidelines for Posting in Verbal GMAT forum before posting anything.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Mar 2011
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 32

Re: Roland: The alarming fact [#permalink] New post 15 Nov 2013, 13:23
egmat wrote:
greatps24 wrote:
Roland: The alarming fact is that 90 percent of the people in this country now report that they know someone who is unemployed.

Sharon: But a normal, moderate level of unemployment is 5 percent, with 1 out of 20 workers unemployed. So at any given time if a person knows approximately 50 workers, 1 or more will very likely be unemployed.

Sharon's argument is structured to lead to which of the following as a conclusion?

(A) The fact that 90% of the people know someone who is unemployed is not an indication that unemployment is abnormally high.
(B) The current level of unemployment is not moderate.
(C) If at least 5% of workers are unemployed, the result of questioning a representative group of people cannot be the percentage Roland cites.
(D) It is unlikely that the people whose statements Roland cites are giving accurate reports.
(E) If an unemployment figure is given as a certain percent, the actual percentage of those without jobs is even higher.

Note : I have found explanation of question with same paragraph but with different question stem. Therefore, request experts to provide their answers with explanations


Hi,

Let's first understand the argument at hand:

Roland says that "The alarming fact is that a fact".

'A Fact' stands for the information that 90 percent of the people in this country now report that they know someone who is unemployed.

Now, there are two parts of Roland's statement. One (latter part) is a fact and the other ("The alarming fact") is a judgement.

Sharon's argument starts with a "But". It means she is either going to counter the judgment or the fact.

In this case, the statement of Sharon clearly does not counter the Roland's fact. It says that at a moderate level of employment, it is likely for people to know at least one person who is employed. So, basically, she counters the judgement of Roland which says that the fact presents some alarming information.

This is what is stated by Option A, which says that the fact doesn't imply that the unemployment is abnormally high (or alarmingly high).

Therefore, the correct choice is option A.

Let's look at other options:

Option C and D can be eliminated on the basis of our discussion. Sharon does not counter the fact cited by Roland.

Option B goes against the Sharon's statement while option E is completely irrelevant.

Critical Reasoning questions are also asked in the new IR section of GMAT. Click on the below image to access a critical reasoning IR question with detailed approach to such questions.

Image

Hope this helps :)

Thanks,
Chiranjeev

Hi Chiranjeev,

Can you please explain what kind of question of this question (assumption, evaluation..)? I have no clue when reading the question so I can not approach such question in detail.

Thanks
Re: Roland: The alarming fact   [#permalink] 15 Nov 2013, 13:23
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. New Roland: The alarming fact is that 90 percent of the people qhoc0010 0 22 Dec 2004, 09:31
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. New Roland: The alarming fact is that 90 percent of the - 2 Qs sushom101 49 19 Oct 2005, 04:28
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. New Roland :The alarming fact is that 90 percent of the people LM 0 03 Jun 2007, 15:41
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. New Roland: the alarming fact is that 90 percent of the people tracyyahoo 0 22 Aug 2011, 12:28
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. New Roland: The alarming fact is that 90 percent of the people mun23 0 07 Mar 2013, 17:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Roland: The alarming fact is that 90 percent of the-OG10#138

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.