generis wrote:
Project SC Butler: Day 10: Sentence Correction (SC1)
For SC butler Questions Click HereRules banning cancer-causing substances from food apply to new food additives and not to natural constituents of food because
their use as additives is entirely avoidable.
A. their use as additives is
B. as additives, their use is
C. the use of such additives is
D. the use of such additives are
E. the use of them as additives is
OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONMy comments are in blue text.Choices A, B, and E are incorrect because the pronouns
their and
them could refer to any of
several plural nouns . . .
AND
• GMAC will tolerate a fair amount of ambiguity, but
• not if another answer choice makes the antecedent clear
In other words, we could probably figure out what them and their refer to
because every answer choice contains "additives."
But ease of understanding is important.
Compared to (C) and (D), the other three answers are murky.[Options] B and E are also awkwardly constructed.
See whether you can explain what "awkwardly constructed" refers to.
Understanding WHY something is described as "awkward" will help you
on harder questions that test rhetoric, diction, and style.In choice D, the plural verb
are does not agree in number with the singular noun
use.
Choice C is the best answer.
___________________________________________
Vinodsai1995 ,
mbadream2020 , and
shiblee - I'm glad you posted!
Today, all correct answers get kudos.
No best answer exists today. (That phenomenon is common in verbal questions.)
I want to add a "guideline" to that which I mention on the main post.
1) We are looking for 4 wrong answers, NOT one correct answer.
AND
2) Multiple choice means that we have the opportunity to COMPARE, once choices are narrowed down. • Use that opportunity in gray areas such as pronoun ambiguity and awkwardness.
In other words, when questions turn on gray areas and meaning,
wrong answers are not so much "wrong" in a way that shouts "definite grammatical error here!" as they are "less good" than the best answer.
• I could argue, for example, that pronoun ambiguity in choice E is not fatal.
I WOULD argue, however, that option E is "not as good as option C BECAUSE . . ."
Nice work, all.