S is a set of integers such that i) if a in in S, then -a is : DS Archive
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 06 Dec 2016, 10:32

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# S is a set of integers such that i) if a in in S, then -a is

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 50
Location: Singapore
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

S is a set of integers such that i) if a in in S, then -a is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2004, 02:06
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

S is a set of integers such that
i) if a in in S, then -a is in S
ii) if each of a and b are in S, then ab is in S.
Is -4 is S

1) 1 is in S
2) 2 is in S
Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 50
Location: Singapore
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2004, 05:15

They have assumed that a and b can be the same number. Subsitutue a=b=2.
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 357
Location: Illinois
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Jan 2004, 12:38
The correct reasoning is as follows:

statemenet 2 says that 2 is in S. This will lead to the conclusion that -2 is in S. So we know that 2 (=a)as well as -2(=b) are in S. So ab = -4 is in S. Thus the second statement is suffecient.

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1810
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 132 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2004, 21:38
ashwyns wrote:

They have assumed that a and b can be the same number. Subsitutue a=b=2.

If they have assumed that a and b are the same number than they can also assume that a and b are not the same number

I bellieve E is my final answer
SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1810
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 132 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2004, 21:39
gmatblast wrote:
The correct reasoning is as follows:

statemenet 2 says that 2 is in S. This will lead to the conclusion that -2 is in S. So we know that 2 (=a)as well as -2(=b) are in S. So ab = -4 is in S. Thus the second statement is suffecient.

How did you make b = -2. I did not understand the logic.
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 357
Location: Illinois
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2004, 19:25
Bhai wrote:
gmatblast wrote:
The correct reasoning is as follows:

statemenet 2 says that 2 is in S. This will lead to the conclusion that -2 is in S. So we know that 2 (=a)as well as -2(=b) are in S. So ab = -4 is in S. Thus the second statement is suffecient.

How did you make b = -2. I did not understand the logic.

Bhai

I am not sure if it caused any confusion when I referred to statement 2. In the problem statement we are given TWO characteristics of set S.

Then we are given two statements to do the suffeciency test.

Now question: Is -4 in S?

STATEMENT 1 : 1 is in S

let us apply both the characteristics one by one

Applying the first characteristics:

1 is in S => -1 is in S

So S = {1, -1} right?

Now apply the second characteritics

We know that 1 and -1 are member of S. so based on second charactreistics, (1)(-1) = -1 should be in S. But this does not add any value because we already know that -1 is member oF S.

So after applying both the characteristics, statement 1 does nt say anything about numbers other than 1 and -1. So other numbers could be memebrs of S or they could not be. We do not know. So statement 1 INSUFFICIENT.

STATEMENT 2 : 2 is in S

Again let us use both the given characterisics of S one by one.

Applying the first characteristic:

2 is in S => -2 is in S

So we now know that S = {2, -2} CORRECT?

Now apply the second characteristic

We know that 2 and -2 are members of S. so based on second charactreistics, (2)(-2) = -4 is in S.

So this answers the question in YES. So statement 2 is SUFFECIENT.

Note that we can further conclude that since -4 is in S, +4 is in S as well. (based on the first characteristic). Now we can also say that since +4 and -4 are in S (4)(-4) = -16 is in S (based on second characteristic). This will be never ending cycle. Of course for this problem, we need to stop as soon as we identified that -4 is the member of S.

Hope this helps.
Display posts from previous: Sort by