The argument mainly states about the carelessness of the drivers while driving.So he argue to remove the safety measures of drivers for alertness of the drivers.In my point of view the accidents cause not only by the drivers and driver’s carelessness, there are so many other reasons to accidents like weather, roads, uncontrollable speedy cars, break failure etc.The main flaw of this argument is compare to the neighboring county without any idea about the neighboring countries traffic system , road condition and all.We don’t know how the court finalized accidents caused by driver.The comparison is another important flaw.The main reason in this argument is to control the accidents ,not the way to remove the safety measures of the drivers.
We should increase the safety measures to save of the driver’s life,not decreasing the safety measures. The 5% of the accidents only caused by the careless of the drivers.For example one of driver park the car in the parking .At the time of parking ,one speedy uncontrollable car dashed the parking car. If the car has no safety measures for driver,the driver leads to death. As a matter of fact the safety measures saves the drivers life in absence of driving.The weaken the argument ,why the author compare the accidents with neighboring country,if we compare the neighboring country means we have to compare all other things also like infrastructure and road conditions etc not only compare the driver and rate of accidents.
The main idea to improve the alertness of the driver by adding some of the car part we include through research and development .Likewise we add the sensor to indicate the accidents and also vibration in driver seats.S o the alert in all times.In my point very object able thing is the spike introduce the steering.We should always think the system increase the life of people not decrease the life of people.How can reduce the accidents by producing cars without safety measures .Nobody ready to buy these type of cars. The old cars having safety measures in the driver seat.This is the main important flaw in this statement.
As we can conclude from this argument reduce the accidents by increasing innovative safety measures to alert the drivers to avoid the carelessness. However comparison not depend on single matter it analyses the so many things and finally conclude the things