|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Posts: 190
Location: work chair
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
sales of united states manufactured goods to [#permalink]
19 Aug 2003, 22:14
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
sales of united states manufactured goods to nonindustrialized countries rose to $167 billion in 1992, which is 14 percent more than the previous year and largely offsets weak demand from europe and japan.
(A) which is 14 percent more than the previous year
(B) which is 14 percent higher than it was the previous year
(C) 14 percent higher than the previous yearтАЩs figure
(D) an amount that is 14 percent more than the previous year was
(E) an amount that is 14 percent higher than the previous yearтАЩs figure
i say - C, they say - E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 147
Location: Kiev
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
I'd have chosen (B)
maybe (E) is right because it addresses us clearly to "an amount" avoiding any ambiguity.
But still it is too long and contains a phrase "previous yearтАЩs figure" which is inappropriate.
It sounds more correctly when you say "the figure of a previous year"
Anyway, we have to wait for our guru AkamaiBrah to explain this answer choise.
_________________
Too much is not enough...
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 773
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
bono wrote: I'd have chosen (B)
maybe (E) is right because it addresses us clearly to "an amount" avoiding any ambiguity.
But still it is too long and contains a phrase "previous yearтАЩs figure" which is inappropriate. It sounds more correctly when you say "the figure of a previous year"
Anyway, we have to wait for our guru AkamaiBrah to explain this answer choise.
E is necessary to maintain a parallel construction:
...., an amount that: 1) is 14% higher than the previous year and: 2) largely offsets weak demand from Europe and Japan.
_________________
Best,
AkamaiBrah Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005 MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 147
Location: Kiev
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
AkamaiBrah
Thanks!
yes, you are right, but the answer is so well hidden that I am not sure whether I find it on a test day
By the way, what is your atitude to using "previous [b]yearтАЩs[/b] figure"?
_________________
Too much is not enough...
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 773
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
bono wrote: AkamaiBrah Thanks! yes, you are right, but the answer is so well hidden that I am not sure whether I find it on a test day By the way, what is your atitude to using "previous yearтАЩs figure"?
I like it better.
Which do you like better:
"Bill's coat is dirty"
or
"the coat that belongs to Bill is dirty" ?
_________________
Best,
AkamaiBrah Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005 MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 147
Location: Kiev
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
of course the first one
but the question is whether we can apply this rule to inanimate things, e.g. project's goal vs. the goal of a project
_________________
Too much is not enough...
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 773
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
bono wrote: of course the first one but the question is whether we can apply this rule to inanimate things, e.g. project's goal vs. the goal of a project
Why not. Possessives are not limited to people.
"O say can you see,
By the dawn's early light...
What so proudly we hail'd
At the twilight's last gleaming..."
_________________
Best,
AkamaiBrah Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005 MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Posts: 190
Location: work chair
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
AkamaiBrah wrote: Why not. Possessives are not limited to people.
"O say can you see, By the dawn's early light... What so proudly we hail'd At the twilight's last gleaming..."
akamai, are you speaking in english?
i remember my student years in college, we learnt poems of some english and american poets, robert burns etc.. very complicated language. even with dictionary we could hardly understand, what's going on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2003
Posts: 73
Location: USA
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: series of sc questions_4 [#permalink]
27 Oct 2003, 22:22
OG also has 1 question like that "the figure last year..."
_________________
I have 2 month for gmat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: series of sc questions_4
[#permalink]
27 Oct 2003, 22:22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, Marcab, Narenn, GetThisDone
|