Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 02:28

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Samples from the floor of a rock shelter in Pennsylvania

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2593
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 0

Samples from the floor of a rock shelter in Pennsylvania [#permalink] New post 14 Dec 2007, 23:46
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (02:50) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 6 sessions
Samples from the floor of a rock shelter in Pennsylvania were dated by analyzing the carbon they contained. The dates assigned to samples associated with human activities formed a consistent series, beginning with the present and going back in time, a series that was correlated with the depth from which the samples came. The oldest and deepest sample was dated at 19,650 years before the present, plus or minus 2,400 years. Skeptic, viewing that date as too early and inconsistent with the accepted date of human migration into North America, suggested that the samples could have been contaminated by dissolved old carbon carried by percolating groundwater from nearby coal deposits.
Which one of the following considerations, if true, argues most strongly against the suggestion of the skeptics?

A. No likely mechanism of contamination involving percolating groundwater would have affected the deeper samples from the site without affecting the uppermost sample.

B. Not every application of the carbon-dating procedure has led to results that have been generally acceptable to scientists.

C. There is no evidence that people were using coal for fuel at any time when the deepest layer might have been laid down.

D. No sample in the series, when retested by the carbon-dating procedure, was assigned an earlier date than that assigned to a sample from a layer above it.

E. No North American site besides the one in Pennsylvania has ever yielded a sample to which the carbon-dating procedure assigned a date that was comparably ancient.



Plz include your reasoning. I swear I saw this before and gave my answer it is incorrect according to GMATTER.
Kaplan Promo CodeKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 867
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 202 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 15 Dec 2007, 09:27
A is the only one that makes sense to me.

The skeptics are saying that the sample was contaminated by percolating groundwater, if there is no likely mechanism of contamination this helps rule out their theory.

B: just because scientists haven't agreed with results in the past doesn't mean these are correct or incorrect

C: it doesn't matter whether they were using coal or not. groundwater carrying contaminates has nothing to do with use.

D. this could establish what happened when, but nothing to do with exactly how many years ago it occurred.

E. if anything this would help back up the skeptics. but even then it doesn't rule out the possibility, it just says it hasn't happened before.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 280
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 2

 [#permalink] New post 16 Dec 2007, 02:38
Very tricky.
_________________

Trying hard to achieve something unachievable now....

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 42
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: CR- Carbon 14 Dating (long one) [#permalink] New post 16 Dec 2007, 21:24
GMATBLACKBELT wrote:
Samples from the floor of a rock shelter in Pennsylvania were dated by analyzing the carbon they contained. The dates assigned to samples associated with human activities formed a consistent series, beginning with the present and going back in time, a series that was correlated with the depth from which the samples came. The oldest and deepest sample was dated at 19,650 years before the present, plus or minus 2,400 years. Skeptic, viewing that date as too early and inconsistent with the accepted date of human migration into North America, suggested that the samples could have been contaminated by dissolved old carbon carried by percolating groundwater from nearby coal deposits.
Which one of the following considerations, if true, argues most strongly against the suggestion of the skeptics?

A. No likely mechanism of contamination involving percolating groundwater would have affected the deeper samples from the site without affecting the uppermost sample.

B. Not every application of the carbon-dating procedure has led to results that have been generally acceptable to scientists.

C. There is no evidence that people were using coal for fuel at any time when the deepest layer might have been laid down.

D. No sample in the series, when retested by the carbon-dating procedure, was assigned an earlier date than that assigned to a sample from a layer above it.

E. No North American site besides the one in Pennsylvania has ever yielded a sample to which the carbon-dating procedure assigned a date that was comparably ancient.



Plz include your reasoning. I swear I saw this before and gave my answer it is incorrect according to GMATTER.


D
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Sep 2007
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 16 Dec 2007, 23:07
I think answer is A? What is OA?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2011
Posts: 23
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 15

Re: Samples from the floor of a rock shelter in Pennsylvania [#permalink] New post 04 Jul 2012, 01:45
Can someone please explain why the answer should be A?

Per A "No likely mechanism of contamination involving percolating groundwater would have affected the deeper samples from the site without affecting the uppermost sample." - but this can also mean that the percolation resuted in contamination of both the upper and the bottom layers and thus the estimation could be wrong for all samples. how does this prove definitely that the percolation did not occur AT ALL ?

Thanks,
Shreya
Re: Samples from the floor of a rock shelter in Pennsylvania   [#permalink] 04 Jul 2012, 01:45
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
12 Experts publish their posts in the topic Rock samples taken from the remains of an asteroid about dvinoth86 9 06 May 2012, 09:55
Rock samples taken from the remains of an asteroid about TomB 3 02 Mar 2012, 14:20
Samples from the floor of a rock shelter in Pennsylvania eyunni 6 04 Dec 2007, 15:47
1 Rock samples taken from the remains of an asteroid about MA 15 18 Jul 2006, 19:18
1 Rock samples taken from the remains of an asteroid about jpv 15 14 Apr 2005, 18:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Samples from the floor of a rock shelter in Pennsylvania

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.