Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 28 Apr 2016, 15:53

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Samuel is obviously a bad fisherman. During the past season,

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Status: Dedicates 2013 to MBA !!
Joined: 06 Jul 2012
Posts: 56
Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.8
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 125 [1] , given: 14

Show Tags

08 Feb 2013, 11:34
1
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

59% (02:02) correct 41% (01:14) wrong based on 361 sessions

HideShow timer Statictics

Samuel is obviously a bad fisherman. During the past season, in which he and the five members of his team spent four months on a boat together off Dutch Harbor, AK, he caught fewer fish than any of his teammates.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument above?

A) Two seasons ago, Samuel fished on another boat off Dutch Harbor and caught more fish than any other member of that boat.
B) Before becoming a fisherman, Samuel piloted a fishing boat whose members regularly caught record numbers of fish.
C) While fishing this past season, Samuel fell sick for a week and did not catch any fish during this time.
D) Unlike the other fishermen on his boat, at the order of the captain, Samuel fished this past season with experimental bait.
E) Amongst the fishing community in Dutch Harbor, Samuel has a reputation for being an especially bad fisherman.

Edit: by carcass
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Thanks and Regards,
Charu Kapoor

Never Never Never GIVE UP !!

VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1420
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 164

Kudos [?]: 1043 [0], given: 62

Show Tags

08 Feb 2013, 11:51
Expert's post
CharuKapoor wrote:
Samuel is obviously a bad fisherman. During the past season, in which he and the five members of his team spent four months on a boat together off Dutch Harbor, AK, he caught fewer fish than any of his teammates.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument above?

A) Two seasons ago, Samuel fished on another boat off Dutch Harbor and caught more fish than any other member of that boat.
B) Before becoming a fisherman, Samuel piloted a fishing boat whose members regularly caught record numbers of fish.
C) While fishing this past season, Samuel fell sick for a week and did not catch any fish during this time.
D) Unlike the other fishermen on his boat, at the order of the captain, Samuel fished this past season with experimental bait.
E) Amongst the fishing community in Dutch Harbor, Samuel has a reputation for being an especially bad fisherman.

Since you are supposed to find the choice that weakens the argument that says that Samuel is a bad fisherman, find for something that can claim to be a difference maker between Samuel and other fishermen.
C and D come as top contenders but since one week is quite short of a time, so D is probably the answer.
Regards
_________________
Senior Manager
Status: Final Lap
Joined: 25 Oct 2012
Posts: 287
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.54
WE: Project Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 220 [0], given: 85

Show Tags

08 Feb 2013, 13:40
+1 for D

Premise : Samuel caught fewer fish than any of his teammates during the past season.

Conclusion : Samuel is a bad fisherman.

D states clearly that Samuel had to use an experimental bait the past season unlike his teammates. Thus, in one hand , this explains why he caught fewer fish than his teammates due probably to the use of the experimental bait and in the other hand that Samuel is not a bad fisherman.
So D weakens the argument properly.

C states that Samuel felt sick during one week ( this could weakens the argument if the time taken in the past season were a week but nothing in the argument said that)
_________________

KUDOS is the good manner to help the entire community.

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2868
Followers: 635

Kudos [?]: 5041 [0], given: 868

Show Tags

08 Feb 2013, 18:36
Expert's post
Marcab wrote:
CharuKapoor wrote:
Samuel is obviously a bad fisherman. During the past season, in which he and the five members of his team spent four months on a boat together off Dutch Harbor, AK, he caught fewer fish than any of his teammates.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument above?

A) Two seasons ago, Samuel fished on another boat off Dutch Harbor and caught more fish than any other member of that boat.
B) Before becoming a fisherman, Samuel piloted a fishing boat whose members regularly caught record numbers of fish.
C) While fishing this past season, Samuel fell sick for a week and did not catch any fish during this time.
D) Unlike the other fishermen on his boat, at the order of the captain, Samuel fished this past season with experimental bait.
E) Amongst the fishing community in Dutch Harbor, Samuel has a reputation for being an especially bad fisherman.

Since you are supposed to find the choice that weakens the argument that says that Samuel is a bad fisherman, find for something that can claim to be a difference maker between Samuel and other fishermen.
C and D come as top contenders but since one week is quite short of a time, so D is probably the answer.
Regards

D must be the answer. is the only answer that introduce a good reason that explains why he had a poor fishing

C saya he was sick for a week but the period of fishing was long 4 months.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 18 Feb 2013
Posts: 32
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 26 [1] , given: 14

Show Tags

19 Feb 2013, 16:22
1
KUDOS
I was debating between C and D, and ultimately picked C.
C-was unable to fish for 1 week.
D-used experimental bait. You have to assume that the experimental bait was worse than the original bait.

Does someone have the official answer?
Manager
Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Posts: 68
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 6

Re: Samuel is obviously a bad fisherman. During the past season, [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Nov 2013, 04:13
I am bit confused about the OA.
If every fishermen will get the same bait, then only conclusion will hold true that Sam is a bad fisherman.

I think C is the best weakner.
Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2011
Posts: 51
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 9

Re: Samuel is obviously a bad fisherman. During the past season, [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Nov 2013, 21:55
This question is similar to the one posted in gmatplatinum.
Current Student
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 2035
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 770 Q0 V
Followers: 42

Kudos [?]: 455 [0], given: 355

Show Tags

03 Jan 2014, 17:42
DoItRight wrote:
I was debating between C and D, and ultimately picked C.
C-was unable to fish for 1 week.
D-used experimental bait. You have to assume that the experimental bait was worse than the original bait.

Does someone have the official answer?

Same here buddy. I though C was stronger

What's the OA brother?

Cheers!
J
Manager
Joined: 25 Oct 2013
Posts: 173
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [1] , given: 56

Show Tags

18 Jan 2014, 06:23
1
KUDOS
jlgdr wrote:
DoItRight wrote:
I was debating between C and D, and ultimately picked C.
C-was unable to fish for 1 week.
D-used experimental bait. You have to assume that the experimental bait was worse than the original bait.

Does someone have the official answer?

Same here buddy. I though C was stronger

What's the OA brother?

Cheers!
J

OA is D. I think source is "Kaplan" (not sure how it got hyperlinked, I didn't do it)!

With C, even if Samuel did not fish for 1 week, it is possible he caught more fish in rest of 3 weeks. It is also possible that he caught less fish. But both cases are possible hence C leaves ambiguity.

D clarifies Samuel followed orders of the captain and used experimental bait. It also states that rest of the fisherman on the boat did not follow captain's orders. So they used better baits giving them unfair advantage over Samuel. This means Samuel's bad catch was NOT due to him being bad fisherman. Thus D weakens the argument.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Click on Kudos if you liked the post!

Practice makes Perfect.

Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Posts: 273
Location: India
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 29

Re: Samuel is obviously a bad fisherman. During the past season, [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Jan 2014, 10:21
Option D weakens the argument by suggesting an alternative explanation as to why S couldn't catch as many fish as others.It's a possibility that the experimental bait was the reason

Posted from my mobile device
Current Student
Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 353
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: ISB '16, IIMA (M)
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 69

Re: Samuel is obviously a bad fisherman. During the past season, [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Jan 2014, 21:55
CONTEST BETWEEN "C" AND "D"------
I AM TRYING TO THINK DIFFERENT FROM TO SOME OF THE PARTICIPANTS ABOVE....DIFFERENT LOGIC.......

C) While fishing this past season, Samuel fell sick for a week and did not catch any fish during this time.... I ALWAYS WIN 100 METER RACE 1 METER AHEAD OF 4 OTHERS....ONCE I WAS MADE TO RUN 2 METER BEHIND THE REST..... I CAME LAST ... 1 METER BEHIND THE REST 4. CAN SOMEONE SAY ---- YOU WERE ONLY 2% BEHIND BALANCE.... YOU COULD HAVE COVERED BALANCE 98% AND BEATEN ALL.....YOU ARE WEAK AS YOU WERE 1 METER BEHIND BALANCE?

D) Unlike the other fishermen on his boat, at the order of the captain, Samuel fished this past season with experimental bait......WHO SAYS THE EXPERIMENTAL BAIT IS INFERIOR TO THE CONVENTIONAL BAIT ? THIS BAIT WAS IMPORTED AND GIVES 400% SUCCESS IN ALL TRIALS....JUST THAT SAMUEL WAS NOT GOOD ENOUGH...

BOTH "C" AND "D" COULD BE RIGHT / WRONG UNDER DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS......
Manager
Joined: 23 May 2013
Posts: 127
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 110

Re: Samuel is obviously a bad fisherman. During the past season, [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Feb 2014, 06:32
semwal wrote:
CONTEST BETWEEN "C" AND "D"------
I AM TRYING TO THINK DIFFERENT FROM TO SOME OF THE PARTICIPANTS ABOVE....DIFFERENT LOGIC.......

C) While fishing this past season, Samuel fell sick for a week and did not catch any fish during this time.... I ALWAYS WIN 100 METER RACE 1 METER AHEAD OF 4 OTHERS....ONCE I WAS MADE TO RUN 2 METER BEHIND THE REST..... I CAME LAST ... 1 METER BEHIND THE REST 4. CAN SOMEONE SAY ---- YOU WERE ONLY 2% BEHIND BALANCE.... YOU COULD HAVE COVERED BALANCE 98% AND BEATEN ALL.....YOU ARE WEAK AS YOU WERE 1 METER BEHIND BALANCE?

D) Unlike the other fishermen on his boat, at the order of the captain, Samuel fished this past season with experimental bait......WHO SAYS THE EXPERIMENTAL BAIT IS INFERIOR TO THE CONVENTIONAL BAIT ? THIS BAIT WAS IMPORTED AND GIVES 400% SUCCESS IN ALL TRIALS....JUST THAT SAMUEL WAS NOT GOOD ENOUGH...

BOTH "C" AND "D" COULD BE RIGHT / WRONG UNDER DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS......

can't agree more with semwal. Nowhere its mentioned that the experimental bait was inferior. May it was much better than the usual bait. Would we have similar question on GMAT? There should be unambiguous answer choices.
_________________

“Confidence comes not from always being right but from not fearing to be wrong.”

Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2012
Posts: 58
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 3

Re: Samuel is obviously a bad fisherman. During the past season, [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Feb 2014, 23:19
C; sounds reasonable. but it doesnt tell us whether the other fishermen were sick or not and for how long.
D; tells us that there was a valid reason behind samue's catch being poor when compared with others'.

D is the better option
Manager
Joined: 26 May 2013
Posts: 57
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 238

Re: Samuel is obviously a bad fisherman. During the past season, [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Dec 2014, 07:31
Should we IGNORE option-A because it's not relevant to present (this past) season?

Marcab wrote:
CharuKapoor wrote:
Samuel is obviously a bad fisherman. During the past season, in which he and the five members of his team spent four months on a boat together off Dutch Harbor, AK, he caught fewer fish than any of his teammates.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument above?

A) Two seasons ago, Samuel fished on another boat off Dutch Harbor and caught more fish than any other member of that boat.
B) Before becoming a fisherman, Samuel piloted a fishing boat whose members regularly caught record numbers of fish.
C) While fishing this past season, Samuel fell sick for a week and did not catch any fish during this time.
D) Unlike the other fishermen on his boat, at the order of the captain, Samuel fished this past season with experimental bait.
E) Amongst the fishing community in Dutch Harbor, Samuel has a reputation for being an especially bad fisherman.

Since you are supposed to find the choice that weakens the argument that says that Samuel is a bad fisherman, find for something that can claim to be a difference maker between Samuel and other fishermen.
C and D come as top contenders but since one week is quite short of a time, so D is probably the answer.
Regards
Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 103
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 20

Re: Samuel is obviously a bad fisherman. During the past season, [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Jan 2015, 16:37
semwal wrote:
CONTEST BETWEEN "C" AND "D"------
I AM TRYING TO THINK DIFFERENT FROM TO SOME OF THE PARTICIPANTS ABOVE....DIFFERENT LOGIC.......

C) While fishing this past season, Samuel fell sick for a week and did not catch any fish during this time.... I ALWAYS WIN 100 METER RACE 1 METER AHEAD OF 4 OTHERS....ONCE I WAS MADE TO RUN 2 METER BEHIND THE REST..... I CAME LAST ... 1 METER BEHIND THE REST 4. CAN SOMEONE SAY ---- YOU WERE ONLY 2% BEHIND BALANCE.... YOU COULD HAVE COVERED BALANCE 98% AND BEATEN ALL.....YOU ARE WEAK AS YOU WERE 1 METER BEHIND BALANCE?

D) Unlike the other fishermen on his boat, at the order of the captain, Samuel fished this past season with experimental bait......WHO SAYS THE EXPERIMENTAL BAIT IS INFERIOR TO THE CONVENTIONAL BAIT ? THIS BAIT WAS IMPORTED AND GIVES 400% SUCCESS IN ALL TRIALS....JUST THAT SAMUEL WAS NOT GOOD ENOUGH...

BOTH "C" AND "D" COULD BE RIGHT / WRONG UNDER DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS......

I agree with Semwal here..
Conclusion: Sam is a bad fisherman..
Option C: Lets say if only Sam was sick and major fishing happened on that week, then conclusion is weakened. If all 5 were sick and no fishing happened then conclusion is strenthened..

Option D: Lets say if new bait is better than conventional one, then conclusion is strenthened.. If new bait is gross, then conclusion is weakened...

Re: Samuel is obviously a bad fisherman. During the past season,   [#permalink] 08 Jan 2015, 16:37
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Samuel is obviously a bad fisherman 4 01 Feb 2015, 07:04
1 Samuel is obviously a bad fisherman. During the past season, 5 14 Dec 2011, 23:52
Samuel is obviously a bad fisherman. During the past season, 16 13 Jun 2011, 17:52
During the past few years, photojournalists have been 7 15 May 2006, 07:37
During the past few years, photojournalists have been 7 15 May 2006, 07:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by