Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinio : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 03 Dec 2016, 04:33

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinio

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Posts: 631
Followers: 78

Kudos [?]: 1086 [3] , given: 136

Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinio [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2013, 06:36
3
KUDOS
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (02:14) correct 45% (01:08) wrong based on 478 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinion the used car John is considering is in good mechanical condition. However, it is clear that Sarah cannot be trusted to give an honest opinion, since when Emmett asked her opinion of his new haircut she lied and said she thought it looked good. Therefore, it is very likely that Sarah also lied in giving her opinion of the mechanical condition of that car.

The argument is flawed by virtue of having committed which one of the following errors of reasoning?

(A) It fails to offer any grounds for the attack it makes on the character of the person.
(B) It confuses claims about the past with claims about the future
(C) It bases a sweeping claim on the evidence provided by an instance that is not clearly relevant
(D) It presents evidence in value-laden terms that presuppose the conclusion for which that evidence is being offered.
(E) It wrongly assumes that because someone is a competent judge of one kind of thing, that person will be a competent judge of a very different kind of thing.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2012
Posts: 55
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [1] , given: 2

Re: Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinio [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2013, 10:35
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
C it is !

Conclusion: Sarah cannot be trusted to give an honest opinion

Support1: Sarah said John's car is in good mechanical condition.
Support3: May have also lied about the car . Therefore, the conclusion.

(A) It fails to offer any grounds for the attack it makes on the character of the person.
Incorrect. It DOES offer grounds for attack (lied about Emmet's haircut)

(B) It confuses claims about the past with claims about the future.
Incorrect. There's no support based on time frame.

(C) It bases a sweeping claim on the evidence provided by an instance that is not clearly relevant
Correct. The claim (that she's lying about the car since she lied about the haircut) is based on the irrelevant incident(haircut). No relation or linkage whatsoever between car condition and haircut likeability has been mentioned.

(D) It presents evidence in value-laden terms that presuppose the conclusion for which that evidence is being offered.
Incorrect. there is NO "pre-supposition" for the conclusion in the evidence given (support statements)

(E) It wrongly assumes that because someone is a competent judge of one kind of thing, that person will be a competent judge of a very different kind of thing.
Incorrect. No support about her being a competent judge of any thing.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1153
Location: United States
Followers: 252

Kudos [?]: 2790 [2] , given: 123

Re: Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinio [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Nov 2013, 00:34
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
This question follows a classical style of CR: using "similar" but irrelevant reasoning.

ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:

Fact: Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinion the used car John is considering is in good mechanical condition.
Fact: when Emmett asked her opinion of his new haircut Sarah lied and said she thought it looked good.
Sub-conclusion: it is clear that Sarah cannot be trusted to give an honest opinion
Main conclusion: it is very likely that Sarah also lied in giving her opinion of the mechanical condition of that car.

Question: The argument is flawed by virtue of having committed which one of the following errors of reasoning?

Pre-thinking: is "opinion of car" relevant to "opinion of hair"

(A) It fails to offer any grounds for the attack it makes on the character of the person.
Wrong. Out of scope. The MAIN conclusion just says Sarah's opinion about the car is not true. The MAIN conclusion does not attack Sarah's character.

(B) It confuses claims about the past with claims about the future
Wrong. Out of scope. Nothing about past vs. future.

(C) It bases a sweeping claim on the evidence provided by an instance that is not clearly relevant
Correct. Clearly, the opinion about hair is NOT relevant to opinion about car. Hair and car are not in the same category. You can't use an apple to replace an orange. Evidences must be in the same category to make the comparison valid.

(D) It presents evidence in value-laden terms that presuppose the conclusion for which that evidence is being offered.
Wrong. Out of scope. The evidence used in the argument does not presuppose the conclusion. D talks about circular reasoning, but it's NOT the case here.

(E) It wrongly assumes that because someone is a competent judge of one kind of thing, that person will be a competent judge of a very different kind of thing.
Wrong. SHELL game. E is a reverse answer.
The logic of the argument is: A is NOT a competent judge of X ==> A is NOT a competent judge of Y either.
But the logic of E is: A is a competent judge of X ==> A is a competent judge of Y.
Clearly, E is a reverse version of the argument. Hence, E is wrong.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Posts: 76
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
GPA: 3.33
WE: Consulting (Non-Profit and Government)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 86

Re: Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinio [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2014, 03:48
so many tricky traps in gmat questions
Intern
Joined: 19 May 2014
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 14

Re: Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinio [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2015, 09:43
Yeah,guessed correct.In First case she was giving her professional opinion.In second case she was telling a white lie which we all tell.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10434
Followers: 882

Kudos [?]: 191 [0], given: 0

Re: Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinio [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 May 2016, 07:48
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinio   [#permalink] 25 May 2016, 07:48
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 An artist who sells her paintings for a fixed price decides that she 2 20 Feb 2016, 05:22
3 If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she 5 09 Feb 2008, 02:54
An artist who sells her paintings for a fixed price decides 5 27 Nov 2007, 13:09
If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she 9 13 Jun 2007, 03:32
If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she 0 08 Apr 2016, 04:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinio

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.