Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 17:05 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 17:05

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 313
Own Kudos [?]: 69 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Milwaukee
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 278
Own Kudos [?]: 1472 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: SF Bay Area, USA
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 56
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Irvine, CA
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 378
Own Kudos [?]: 224 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: SC Hoover [#permalink]
nocilis wrote:
C) needs a possesive pronoun his instead of him

B, D, and E sounds ackward

I go with A


Yes (A) is least worst among all.

However, I am not sure whether (A) is able to convey the contrast which is required for the sentence.

Someone please explain what is meaning and usage of "for all....". :roll:
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 2004
Own Kudos [?]: 1899 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Singapore
Send PM
Re: SC Hoover [#permalink]
(B) and (D) are lengthy and awkward.
(E) changes the meaning of the sentence somewhat.

Left with (A) and (C). I'm inclined to pick (C) over (A).
(A) states that although he has certain (outstanding) qualitites, President Hoover is awkward dealing with people (a capability, i.e. capable of communicating well or not). Therefore from a parallel point of view, (A) is not suitable.

(C) uses being an able manager and able executive. This infers capability as opposed to a quality. And the use of 'despite' seems to gel in well with the non-underlined portion (desipte... he is not..)

(C) for me.
User avatar
CEO
CEO
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 2709
Own Kudos [?]: 1537 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: SC Hoover [#permalink]
A it is
C is just wordy with awkward use of personal pronoun
Look at definition #6 "for" https://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictiona ... ary&va=for
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 360
Own Kudos [?]: 20 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: SC Hoover [#permalink]
Paul

How can you compare ability to a person? Please explain.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 456
Own Kudos [?]: 1497 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: SC Hoover [#permalink]
Paul wrote:
A it is
C is just wordy with awkward use of personal pronoun
Look at definition #6 "for" https://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictiona ... ary&va=for


I am really suspect about the use of "for" which is used to "qualify" a condition.

In this case, his exellent abilities do not qualify the reason of his "awkward". I would use "although" "even though" or "despite" for this case. However, (C) is worse with its wording.
I am not sure about (E). Can we have just "even" instead of "even though"?
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 2004
Own Kudos [?]: 1899 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Singapore
Send PM
Re: SC Hoover [#permalink]
I do not think there is a unclear use of the personal pronoun. There is only a subject in the sentence, President Hoover. The pronoun 'him' can only refer to him.
This extends to the use of the possesive pronoun 'his' which appears in every other answer choices.

I still think (C) is suitable. It does not compare a quality to a person's character (not comfortable dealing with other people)
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 287
Own Kudos [?]: 54 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: SC Hoover [#permalink]
Sorry here, but (A) sounds best to my ear. Can imagine the answer being anything else.
User avatar
CEO
CEO
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 2709
Own Kudos [?]: 1537 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: SC Hoover [#permalink]
In E, "even having" does not set the right contrast b/w the first and last part of the sentence.
Once again, use of relative pronoun is much better in connecting the prepositional phrase to the second half of the sentence: we are sure that the ability belongs to Hoover
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 2004
Own Kudos [?]: 1899 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Singapore
Send PM
Re: SC Hoover [#permalink]
Paul wrote:
A it is
C is just wordy with awkward use of personal pronoun
Look at definition #6 "for" https://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictiona ... ary&va=for


Paul, thanks for the link. It certainly helped to learn the grammar behind this question.
avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 971
Own Kudos [?]: 769 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: SC Hoover [#permalink]
I had to choose from A, C, D. C is out because of "him". D might be out because of "being"? I'm not sure.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 378
Own Kudos [?]: 224 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: SC Hoover [#permalink]
Paul wrote:
A it is
C is just wordy with awkward use of personal pronoun
Look at definition #6 "for" https://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictiona ... ary&va=for


After going through that link, I will say (A) is definitely best answer.
"For all" : maintains contrast ( meaning: in spite of) (Used as presposition)
"his": maintains Possessive form.

Usage:
in spite of == when "for" usually used with all:
<for all his large size, he moves gracefully>
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 548
Own Kudos [?]: 4447 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Taiwan
Send PM
Re: SC Hoover [#permalink]
Paul wrote:
In E, "even having" does not set the right contrast b/w the first and last part of the sentence.
Once again, use of relative pronoun is much better in connecting the prepositional phrase to the second half of the sentence: we are sure that the ability belongs to Hoover


Hello, Paul

I don't understand.

In choice E, the participial pharse left out the subject; in my opinion, the subject should be Hoover.

I think it's very clear, isn't it?

Please give me more concepts. thanks.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Feb 2005
Posts: 70
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: San Jose
Send PM
Re: SC Hoover [#permalink]
A or E.
I would go with E.

A - Concise. But shouldn't it be "executive and managerial abilities"?
B - "For all that" sounds unidiomatic
C - "his", not "him"
D - Contrast keyword, such as "even though", missing
E - The lesser evil.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 313
Own Kudos [?]: 69 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Milwaukee
Send PM
Re: SC Hoover [#permalink]
OA is A
User avatar
CEO
CEO
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 2709
Own Kudos [?]: 1537 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: SC Hoover [#permalink]
chunjuwu wrote:
Paul wrote:
In E, "even having" does not set the right contrast b/w the first and last part of the sentence.
Once again, use of relative pronoun is much better in connecting the prepositional phrase to the second half of the sentence: we are sure that the ability belongs to Hoover


Hello, Paul

I don't understand.

In choice E, the participial pharse left out the subject; in my opinion, the subject should be Hoover.

I think it's very clear, isn't it?

Please give me more concepts. thanks.

"even having" is just not a good participial phrase setting the contrast b/w Hoover's inability in dealing with people and his managerial/executive abilities.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 548
Own Kudos [?]: 4447 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Taiwan
Send PM
Re: SC Hoover [#permalink]
Paul wrote:
chunjuwu wrote:
Paul wrote:
In E, "even having" does not set the right contrast b/w the first and last part of the sentence.
Once again, use of relative pronoun is much better in connecting the prepositional phrase to the second half of the sentence: we are sure that the ability belongs to Hoover


Hello, Paul

I don't understand.

In choice E, the participial pharse left out the subject; in my opinion, the subject should be Hoover.

I think it's very clear, isn't it?

Please give me more concepts. thanks.

"even having" is just not a good participial phrase setting the contrast b/w Hoover's inability in dealing with people and his managerial/executive abilities.


Hello, Paul,
Does the usage of for here suggest any contrast meaning?
I'm not sure yet.

Thanks
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 378
Own Kudos [?]: 224 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: SC Hoover [#permalink]
chunjuwu wrote:
Does the usage of for here suggest any contrast meaning?
I'm not sure yet.


ur question is answered.. follow the link mentioned by Paul..

jpv wrote:
Paul wrote:


After going through that link, I will say (A) is definitely best answer.
"For all" : maintains contrast ( meaning: in spite of) (Used as presposition)
"his": maintains Possessive form.

Usage:
in spite of == when "for" usually used with all:




Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: SC Hoover [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
Current Student
278 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne