Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 May 2013, 16:59
Customize  |  Hide

SC - Modifers Vs Misplaced Modifiers.

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 714
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
SC - Modifers Vs Misplaced Modifiers. [#permalink] New post 11 Apr 2005, 14:08
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
I have a question about modifiers Vs misplaced modifiers when applied to certain sentences. Could someone elaborate on this:

For e.g:

Several accidents have been reported involving passengers falling from trains

A rumor circulated among the staff that he was being promoted to Vice President . (instead of "A rumor that he was being promoted to Vice President circulated among the staff.")

According to http://webster.commnet.edu/grammar/phra ... infinitive

it is okay to split the noun phrase [stuff in red]. How is this not wrong? In the above 2 examples the nouns [accidents, rumor] have qualifying phrases/modifiers [involving passengers falling from trains, that he was being promoted to Vice President] that are "away" from the noun they are qualifying. Isnt this the same as a misplaced modifier - for instance:

<Prepositional Phrase>, <some verbiage> followed by a noun?

Is it a rule that its okay to have subject verb <prepositional phrase> but NOT

<prepositional phrase> <some verbiage> followed by a noun?

I was under the impression that any qualifier for a noun should be right NEXT to the noun [either preceding or following]. If that is not the case how do you distingush between
"good" modifiers Vs Modifiers that modify a noun incorrectly - therefore creating misplaced modifiers.

All you SC experts please chime in.
Kaplan Promo CodeKnewton GMAT Discount CodesManhattan GMAT Discount Codes
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4441
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 15 Apr 2005, 19:55
If a phrase, any kind, starts off a sentence as an introductory modifier, the noun after the comma has to be the noun being modified by the introductory modifier. Thus, you cannot have any "verbiage" after an introductory modifier. However, it is entirely normal, as shown in your examples, to have the modifiers split from the noun they intend to modify. The only purpose of it would be to shift the emphasis of the sentence as to what is to be considered more important in the sentence.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

  [#permalink] 15 Apr 2005, 19:55
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts SC - what modifes what?? dj 5 31 Dec 2003, 17:13
New posts doubt in misplaced-modifier. anuramm 2 24 Jul 2004, 04:01
New posts SC-Psychologists-misplaced guilt abisurd 3 07 Aug 2004, 07:31
New posts SC: Modifier darren1010 4 22 Jun 2006, 15:17
New posts 1 SC: Modifier amitanand 6 31 Jan 2010, 22:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by

SC - Modifers Vs Misplaced Modifiers.

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.