Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 02:27

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

School desegregation has worked well in Buffalo, New York,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2011
Posts: 85
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GPA: 3.4
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 29

School desegregation has worked well in Buffalo, New York, [#permalink] New post 09 Jun 2012, 09:31
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

79% (02:16) correct 21% (01:38) wrong based on 28 sessions
School desegregation has worked well in Buffalo, New York, in part because parents and teachers were given major roles in designing the city’s magnet schools, because extra federal funds were allocated to make each school unique, and because the federal judge enforced desegregation orders.
(A) because extra federal funds were allocated to make each school unique
(B) because of the allocation of extra federal funds that make each school unique
(C) because each school is made unique by allocating it extra federal funds
(D) extra federal funds were allocated in order to make each school unique
(E) extra federal funds were allocated for making each school unique

why is choice c incorrect
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2012
Posts: 303
Weight: 170lbs
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42
GMAT 2: 740 Q48 V42
WE: Analyst (Other)
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 37

Re: School desegregation in Buffalo [#permalink] New post 09 Jun 2012, 11:19
Not sure if this underlining is correct. Please post it in the future.

School desegregation has worked well in Buffalo, New York, in part because parents and teachers were given major roles in designing the city’s magnet schools, because extra federal funds were allocated to make each school unique, and because the federal judge enforced desegregation orders.

(A) because extra federal funds were allocated to make each school unique
(B) because of the allocation of extra federal funds that make each school unique
(C) because each school is made unique by allocating it extra federal funds
(D) extra federal funds were allocated in order to make each school unique
(E) extra federal funds were allocated for making each school unique

A is the obvious answer here after skimming the choices. Eliminate D & E because they break with the structure of the sentence. Eliminate B & C as they're simply poorly worded. To answer your specific question, I think we can eliminate C for three reasons: changes the tense, passive when there is a better active choice, and the usage of "by" here is confusing.
1 KUDOS received
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2011
Posts: 56
GMAT 1: Q V
GRE 1: 1600 Q800 V800
GRE 2: 1600 Q800 V800
Followers: 74

Kudos [?]: 80 [1] , given: 2

Re: School desegregation in Buffalo [#permalink] New post 09 Jun 2012, 12:15
1
This post received
KUDOS
A and C are the only answers that are parallel. B might seem to be parallel, but in fact the because in B is followed by a noun phrase, while the two earlier becauses are followed by clauses.

So what's wrong with C? (1) It changes the meaning slightly. According to the original, the purpose of the extra funds was to make each school unique (whatever their actual affect), while according to C the extra funds did make each school unique (whatever they were intended for). (2) It is awkward. In particular, the usual direct object of the verb allocate is the stuff being allocated rather than person/agency/whatever receiving the stuff. But In C, the direct object of allocate is it (whose antecedent is each school) rather than the more standard funds.

Since vandygrad11 mentioned active/passive voice, I should point out a few thing:
-Answer A, the OA, is also in the passive voice, so voice doesn't seem to be the problem here.
-Standard Written English allows parallel clauses to have different voices, and in fact that's inevitable here, since the first of the parallel clauses (parents and teachers were given major roles) is passive, while the third (the federal judge enforced desegregation orders) is active. Neither of those is underlined, so neither of those will change, so were stuck with different voices.
-Different voices actually make sense here, since neither the parents nor the funds are agents in their clauses, while the judge is the agent in his.
-It's true that active is usually better than passive, but there are plenty of exceptions.
-It's true that consistent voice is better, but there are exceptions.
-Voice is not usually dispositive anyway. When passive is wrong, it's usually because the passive voice creates a distinct error. For instance, Thirsty after a long day of yard work, I drank the whole pitcher of lemonade. is better than Thirsty after a long day of yard work, the whole pitcher of lemonade was drunk by me. because according to the first I was thirsty, while according to the second, the pitcher of lemonade was thirsty.
_________________


Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2012
Posts: 303
Weight: 170lbs
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42
GMAT 2: 740 Q48 V42
WE: Analyst (Other)
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 37

Re: School desegregation in Buffalo [#permalink] New post 09 Jun 2012, 12:19
Yeah, that's a good point. I went back and noticed that. Rushed through the problem, I think.

I'm curious if you've seen many instances of passive/active voice being tested on the GMAT. I would like to get a V51 if possible!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2011
Posts: 85
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GPA: 3.4
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 29

Re: School desegregation in Buffalo [#permalink] New post 09 Jun 2012, 21:15
Is option a in passive voice because federal fund is the object of the verb allocation but it is acting as a subject

what if i write option c as because each school is made unique by allocating extra federal funds to the school , would there still be object error
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: Project Management Professional (PMP)
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Posts: 213
Location: New Delhi, India
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 12

Re: School desegregation in Buffalo [#permalink] New post 12 Jun 2012, 07:53
MichaelS wrote:
A and C are the only answers that are parallel. B might seem to be parallel, but in fact the because in B is followed by a noun phrase, while the two earlier becauses are followed by clauses.

So what's wrong with C? (1) It changes the meaning slightly. According to the original, the purpose of the extra funds was to make each school unique (whatever their actual affect), while according to C the extra funds did make each school unique (whatever they were intended for). (2) It is awkward. In particular, the usual direct object of the verb allocate is the stuff being allocated rather than person/agency/whatever receiving the stuff. But In C, the direct object of allocate is it (whose antecedent is each school) rather than the more standard funds.

Since vandygrad11 mentioned active/passive voice, I should point out a few thing:
-Answer A, the OA, is also in the passive voice, so voice doesn't seem to be the problem here.
-Standard Written English allows parallel clauses to have different voices, and in fact that's inevitable here, since the first of the parallel clauses (parents and teachers were given major roles) is passive, while the third (the federal judge enforced desegregation orders) is active. Neither of those is underlined, so neither of those will change, so were stuck with different voices.
-Different voices actually make sense here, since neither the parents nor the funds are agents in their clauses, while the judge is the agent in his.
-It's true that active is usually better than passive, but there are plenty of exceptions.
-It's true that consistent voice is better, but there are exceptions.
-Voice is not usually dispositive anyway. When passive is wrong, it's usually because the passive voice creates a distinct error. For instance, Thirsty after a long day of yard work, I drank the whole pitcher of lemonade. is better than Thirsty after a long day of yard work, the whole pitcher of lemonade was drunk by me. because according to the first I was thirsty, while according to the second, the pitcher of lemonade was thirsty.

Between A and C can we also say that use of "is" in C also contributes in making it incorrect as the main sentence uses "were"
_________________

Best
Vaibhav

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, Thanks

Re: School desegregation in Buffalo   [#permalink] 12 Jun 2012, 07:53
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic School desegregation has worked well in Buffalo, New York, ajit257 5 11 Dec 2010, 08:14
School desegregation has worked well in Buffalo, New York, Jamesk486 2 30 May 2007, 19:33
School desegregation has worked well in Buffalo, New York, gmacvik 1 30 Jan 2006, 13:43
School desegregation has worked well in Buffalo, New York, giddi77 6 23 Jan 2006, 22:27
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York gamjatang 10 27 Nov 2005, 07:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

School desegregation has worked well in Buffalo, New York,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.