Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Sep 2014, 12:40

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Science Academy study: It has been demonstrated that with

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 284 [0], given: 1

Premium Member CAT Tests
Science Academy study: It has been demonstrated that with [#permalink] New post 24 May 2009, 06:00
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions
Science Academy study: It has been demonstrated that with natural methods, some well-managed farms are able to reduce the amounts of synthetic fertilizer and pesticide and also of antibiotics they use without necessarily decreasing yields; in some cases yields can be increased.
Critics: Not so. The farms the academy selected to study were the ones that seemed most likely to be successful in using natural methods. What about the farmers who have tried such methods and failed?
Which one of the following is the most adequate evaluation of the logical force of the critics’ response?
(A) Success and failure in farming are rarely due only to luck, because farming is the management of chance occurrences.
(B) The critics show that the result of the study would have been different if twice as many farms had been studied.
(C) The critics assume without justification that the failures were not due to soil quality.
(D) The critics demonstrate that natural methods are not suitable for the majority of framers.
(E) The issue is only to show that something is possible, so it is not relevant whether the instances studied were representative.
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 117
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: Farming [#permalink] New post 24 May 2009, 06:55
E it is


sampling error
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 258
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: Farming [#permalink] New post 24 May 2009, 07:16
IMO E

Science Academy study: It has been demonstrated that with natural methods, some well-managed farms are able to reduce the amounts of synthetic fertilizer and pesticide and also of antibiotics they use without necessarily decreasing yields; in some cases yields can be increased.
Critics: Not so. The farms the academy selected to study were the ones that seemed most likely to be successful in using natural methods. What about the farmers who have tried such methods and failed?
Which one of the following is the most adequate evaluation of the logical force of the critics’ response?
(A) Success and failure in farming are rarely due only to luck, because farming is the management of chance occurrencs -->not mentioned
(B) The critics show that the result of the study would have been different if twice as many farms had been studied -->not mentioned
(C) The critics assume without justification that the failures were not due to soil quality --> not mentioned
(D) The critics demonstrate that natural methods are not suitable for the majority of framers -->not mentioned
(E) The issue is only to show that something is possible, so it is not relevant whether the instances studied were representative --> best: something possible happens with successful farms with natural methods, but he fails to show impossible successful farms with such methods. So, totally, this study can't prove to be representative of the whole
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 172
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 3

Re: Farming [#permalink] New post 25 May 2009, 11:16
sondenso wrote:
Science Academy study: It has been demonstrated that with natural methods, some well-managed farms are able to reduce the amounts of synthetic fertilizer and pesticide and also of antibiotics they use without necessarily decreasing yields; in some cases yields can be increased.
Critics: Not so. The farms the academy selected to study were the ones that seemed most likely to be successful in using natural methods. What about the farmers who have tried such methods and failed?
Which one of the following is the most adequate evaluation of the logical force of the critics’ response?

(A) Success and failure in farming are rarely due only to luck, because farming is the management of chance occurrences.
(B) The critics show that the result of the study would have been different if twice as many farms had been studied.
(C) The critics assume without justification that the failures were not due to soil quality.
(D) The critics demonstrate that natural methods are not suitable for the majority of farmers.
(E) The issue is only to show that something is possible, so it is not relevant whether the instances studied were representative.


A - Kind of confusing... I'm not too drawn by this one.
B - Yeah... warming up a little, let's see if something else does a better job.
C - Same feeling as A... not too accurate
E - This sounds more like a response by the science academy, rather than an evaluation of the critic's argument.

D - This seems like the best descriptor of the critic's argument. They said only a few suitable farms were studied, while implying many have failed. I wouldn't go so far as to conclude that the MAJORITY of farms are unsuitable for this practice, but it seems like the best answer of the lot.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 172
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 3

Re: Farming [#permalink] New post 25 May 2009, 11:17
Now that I've reread the question & the replies, I agree with E.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 May 2009
Posts: 108
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Farming [#permalink] New post 08 Jun 2009, 04:22
I'd go with E too
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 852
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 182 [0], given: 106

GMAT Tests User
Re: Farming [#permalink] New post 08 Jun 2009, 07:38
E for me too (1:51)
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ... :beer
My debrief : journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Re: Farming   [#permalink] 08 Jun 2009, 07:38
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Curbing government spending has been demonstrated to raise t vad3tha 2 25 Aug 2014, 00:19
It has been demonstrated that individuals who participated Singhmanjit 1 10 Aug 2013, 21:10
Already discussed at: cr-science-academy-study-17416.html rohitgoel15 5 08 Aug 2010, 00:48
SC: National Academy of Sciences u2lover 13 12 Nov 2006, 16:22
Science Academy study: It has been demonstrated that with WinWinMBA 5 18 Jun 2005, 08:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Science Academy study: It has been demonstrated that with

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.