Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 08:51

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Current Student
avatar
Status: If u've ego, u've reached ur limit; if ur humble u've no limit.
Affiliations: IIT
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Posts: 72
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.1
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 30

Re: Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in [#permalink] New post 07 Apr 2012, 10:19
Premise: Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in Antarctic ice during the Earth’s last ice age found that the ice-age atmosphere had contained unusually large amounts of ferrous material and surprisingly small amounts of carbon dioxide. One scientist noted that algae absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

Conclusion: ferrous material promoted a great increase in the population of Antarctica algae such as diatoms.

Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the scientist’s hypothesis?

A) Diatoms are a microscopic form of algae that has remained largely unchanged since the last ice age.
Only Diatoms has remained unchanged; other types of Algae may have increased - we do not know

(B) Computer models suggest that a large increase in ferrous material today could greatly promote the growth of oceanic algae. - Strengthens the argument

(C) The dust found in the air bubbles trapped in Antarctica ice contained other minerals in addition to the ferrous material.
Something else besides Ferrous material might be the reason

(D) Sediment from the ocean floor near Antarctica reflects no increase, during the last ice age, in the rate at which the shells that diatoms leave when they die accumulated.
No increase in death; does that mean the population decreased? NO

(E) Algae that currently grow in the oceans near Antarctica do not appear to be harmed by even a large increase in exposure to ferrous material. No harm because of ferrous material but does it benefits the growth?

Only C is coming close to undermining the argument.
_________________

--Syed
" Some are desperate for success, and therefore destined for it."

Expert Post
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Preparing for the another shot...!
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1425
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 128

Kudos [?]: 643 [0], given: 62

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in [#permalink] New post 02 Oct 2012, 23:10
Expert's post
Guys are saying that option D is within scope. I doubt!
This option describes a scenario near Antarctica. HOW COULD THIS BE CORRECT?
C correctly describes that there may be other minerals that might have been the reason behind the increase in population of algae.
Verbal experts please explain the correct answer.
_________________

Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified
Rules For Posting
www.Univ-Scholarships.com

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 98
Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-25-2012
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 62

Re: Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in [#permalink] New post 03 Oct 2012, 08:39
Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in Antarctic ice during the Earth’s last ice age found that the ice-age atmosphere had contained unusually large amounts of ferrous material and surprisingly small amounts of carbon dioxide. One scientist noted that algae absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The scientist hypothesized that the ferrous material, which was contained in atmospheric dust, had promoted a great increase in the population of Antarctica algae such as diatoms.

Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the scientist’s hypothesis?

A) Diatoms are a microscopic form of algae that has remained largely unchanged since the last ice age.
talks about diatoms(population has remained unchanged) in general, not specifically about Antarctica region.
(B) Computer models suggest that a large increase in ferrous material today could greatly promote the growth of oceanic algae.
Incorrect - Strengthens the argument
(C) The dust found in the air bubbles trapped in Antarctica ice contained other minerals in addition to the ferrous material.
The statement mentions that air bubbles contained other minerals but if other minerals caused increase in algae population is assuming too much for me. what if they were harmful...
(D) Sediment from the ocean floor near Antarctica reflects no increase, during the last ice age, in the rate at which the shells that diatoms leave when they die accumulated.
specifically talks about diatoms population around Antarctica region. Correct.
(E) Algae that currently grow in the oceans near Antarctica do not appear to be harmed by even a large increase in exposure to ferrous material.
neutral or a weak strengthner because it says ferrous material is not harmful to algae population.
_________________

if my post helped you, let me know by pressing Kudos...

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 May 2012
Posts: 76
Location: United States
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 23

Re: Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in [#permalink] New post 26 May 2013, 11:55
vaibhav87 wrote:
Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in Antarctic ice during the Earth’s last ice age found that the ice-age atmosphere had contained unusually large amounts of ferrous material and surprisingly small amounts of carbon dioxide. One scientist noted that algae absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The scientist hypothesized that the ferrous material, which was contained in atmospheric dust, had promoted a great increase in the population of Antarctica algae such as diatoms.

Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the scientist’s hypothesis?

A) Diatoms are a microscopic form of algae that has remained largely unchanged since the last ice age.

(B) Computer models suggest that a large increase in ferrous material today could greatly promote the growth of oceanic algae.

(C) The dust found in the air bubbles trapped in Antarctica ice contained other minerals in addition to the ferrous material.

(D) Sediment from the ocean floor near Antarctica reflects no increase, during the last ice age, in the rate at which the shells that diatoms leave when they die accumulated.

(E) Algae that currently grow in the oceans near Antarctica do not appear to be harmed by even a large increase in exposure to ferrous material.



Answer is C , in my opinion.
We need to undermine the scientists hypothesis that "ferrous material had promoted increase in algae" ...
OPtion C says , "there were couple of other stuffs found in the air bubbles trapped in the ice" , gives us a reason to believe that something else might have promoted an increase in algae - and hence doubt scientists hypothesis that ferrous is responsible for an increase.

Whereas, Option D , undermines the premise , but not the scientists hypothesis/conclusion. The premise says that there was an increase in algae then. D only lets us know that there might not be an increase in the algae back then . But we are not supposed to undermine the premise and rather are supposed to take it to be true. In this view, D does nothing to undermine the conclusion that "ferrous led to the increase in algae".

HTH
Jyothi
_________________

Jyothi hosamani

Current Student
avatar
Status: Married
Affiliations: MENSA India
Joined: 30 Apr 2011
Posts: 102
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
GMAT 1: 630 Q42 V35
GMAT 2: 640 Q42 V35
GMAT 3: 640 Q44 V32
GMAT 4: 660 Q47 V34
GMAT 5: 680 Q46 V37
GPA: 3.6
WE: Sales (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 13

Re: Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2013, 20:14
Answer D according to me.

Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in Antarctic ice during the Earth’s last ice age found that the ice-age atmosphere had contained unusually large amounts of ferrous material and surprisingly small amounts of carbon dioxide. One scientist noted that algae absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The scientist hypothesized that the ferrous material, which was contained in atmospheric dust, had promoted a great increase in the population of Antarctica algae such as diatoms.

Summary: Scientists found that the atmosphere during the last ice age had large amounts of ferrous material and very less carbon dioxide. Explanation for very less carbon dioxide was that algae absorbed it.
Hypothesis: The increase in algae was because of the ferrous material.


Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the scientist’s hypothesis?

Thought process: How can we weaken the Hypothesis?
Either we say the cause of the increase was not ferrous material, or we say there was no increase in algae whatsoever!
"No-increase-whatsoever" gives a lethal blow to the hypothesis!


A) Diatoms are a microscopic form of algae that has remained largely unchanged since the last ice age.
Talks about Diatoms, but not about "no increase whatsoever"

(B) Computer models suggest that a large increase in ferrous material today could greatly promote the growth of oceanic algae.
Says there was "definitely an increase!", thereby strengthening the argument.

(C) The dust found in the air bubbles trapped in Antarctica ice contained other minerals in addition to the ferrous material.
Talks about "other minerals". This does not imply "other minerals caused the increase in algae." Close, but definitely not convincing enough to destroy the hypothesis

(D) Sediment from the ocean floor near Antarctica reflects no increase, during the last ice age, in the rate at which the shells that diatoms leave when they die accumulated.
No increase in the mortal remains of algae! No increase in algae whatsoever! This is surely the answer :-D

(E) Algae that currently grow in the oceans near Antarctica do not appear to be harmed by even a large increase in exposure to ferrous material.
Talks about algae of today and not about algae during the last Ice Age.

So answer according to me is D.
_________________

Always aim at the moon. Never mind if you miss, you will fall in the stars :-)

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2013
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in [#permalink] New post 11 Jun 2013, 06:46
vaibhav87 wrote:
Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in Antarctic ice during the Earth’s last ice age found that the ice-age atmosphere had contained unusually large amounts of ferrous material and surprisingly small amounts of carbon dioxide. One scientist noted that algae absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The scientist hypothesized that the ferrous material, which was contained in atmospheric dust, had promoted a great increase in the population of Antarctica algae such as diatoms.

Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine the scientist’s hypothesis?

A) Diatoms are a microscopic form of algae that has remained largely unchanged since the last ice age.

(B) Computer models suggest that a large increase in ferrous material today could greatly promote the growth of oceanic algae.

(C) The dust found in the air bubbles trapped in Antarctica ice contained other minerals in addition to the ferrous material.

(D) Sediment from the ocean floor near Antarctica reflects no increase, during the last ice age, in the rate at which the shells that diatoms leave when they die accumulated.

(E) Algae that currently grow in the oceans near Antarctica do not appear to be harmed by even a large increase in exposure to ferrous material.


In causality questions when argument say X cause Y I try to look 3 things
1) Maybe Y cause X
2)Something else cause Y
3) Y and X happens in the same time by coincidence

The argument states that The scientist hypothesized that the ferrous material, which was contained in atmospheric dust, had promoted a great increase in the population of Antarctica algae such as diatoms.
And in this example in C is looks like good example of Maybe not Ferrous material but something else may cause increase in algeas
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Training
Joined: 03 Jun 2013
Posts: 90
Location: Canada
GPA: 3.7
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 36 [1] , given: 3

GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in [#permalink] New post 11 Jun 2013, 16:54
1
This post received
KUDOS
vaibhav87 wrote:
(C) The dust found in the air bubbles trapped in Antarctica ice contained other minerals in addition to the ferrous material.

(D) Sediment from the ocean floor near Antarctica reflects no increase, during the last ice age, in the rate at which the shells that diatoms leave when they die accumulated.


Here's my take on these two:
C) There are a few materials; we hypothesize that ferrous material is the cause.
D) There has been a decrease in death, and thus there has unlikely been an increase in life.

"The scientist hypothesized that the ferrous material, which was contained in atmospheric dust, had promoted a great increase in the population of Antarctica algae such as diatoms"

For (C) to be correct, we are attacking the "ferrous material was the cause" issue.
For (D) to be correct, we are attacking the "increase in population" issue.

In my opinion, for those who say C is correct, you are in a way assuming that there was a - great increase - in the population, but that ferrous material was not the cause.

D is the correct answer because there could not have been a - great increase - in population with absolutely no change in mortality rate.
_________________

KUDOS please if my post was useful!

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2013
Posts: 14
Schools: IMD '16
GMAT 1: 500 Q V
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in [#permalink] New post 12 Jun 2013, 23:32
Answer should be A, because here if we look at choice D, which says "sediment from the ocean floor near Antarctica reflects no increase, during the last ice age, in the rate at which the shells that diatoms leave when they die accumulated."
this choice shows no meaning to me, as weakening is concerned. as there is no increase in sediments, which points to shell that diatoms leave when they die.

As for A choice is concerned" Diatoms are a microscopic form of algae that has remained largely unchanged since the last ice age." Diatoms are unchanged, that is giving some counter to conclusion "great increase in the population of Antarctica algae such as diatoms.".
Re: Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in   [#permalink] 12 Jun 2013, 23:32
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
12 Experts publish their posts in the topic Some scientists suggest the moon had been formed out of part goodyear2013 9 21 Mar 2014, 15:35
Experts publish their posts in the topic Some scientists suggest the moon had been formed out of part agdimple333 9 27 Jun 2011, 17:57
Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in gmatcrook 12 27 Aug 2006, 17:17
Analyzing campaign expenditures, the media has had as a vivek123 11 24 Jan 2006, 11:22
had been ankitraheja 0 11 Sep 2005, 05:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Scientists analyzing air bubbles that had been trapped in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 28 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.