Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Apr 2014, 06:39

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Scientists have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF19, that is

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 161
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Scientists have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF19, that is [#permalink] New post 17 Jun 2008, 08:14
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Scientists have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF19, that is about half a mile wide and, if it strikes Earth, it can do tremendous damage to part of the planet but probably not cause planetwide destruction.


A. and, if it strikes Earth, it can do tremendous damage to part of the planet but
B. and, if it would strike Earth, part of the planet could experience a tremendous
amount of damage but it would
C. and that, if it were to strike Earth, could do tremendous damage to part of the
planet but would
D. and that, if Earth is struck by it, can do part of the planet tremendous damage, but it would
E. and that, if it strikes Earth, it could experience a tremendous amount of damage but


subjunctive usage..
please help me with this..
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 376
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: asteroid SC [#permalink] New post 17 Jun 2008, 08:24
Is it C.

Pronoun it does not have a clear referrent in rest of the choices.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 76
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Re: asteroid SC [#permalink] New post 17 Jun 2008, 08:31
A. if strikes, then would/could(future tense), no proper pronoun reference(it here refers to Earth)
B. would will never come in the if part of the condition, no proper pronoun reference(it refers to Earth)
C. if stikes, then could...but would(parallelism and tense match)
D. is stuck by it...passive, no proper pronoun reference(it here refers to Earth)
E. if strikes, then could (use is correct)...but lacks parallelism, no proper pronoun reference(it here refers to Earth)

Go with C.

Can someone tell me if i'm wrong, in the way i'm eliminating the answer choices.

Last edited by sumanamba on 17 Jun 2008, 08:36, edited 1 time in total.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Posts: 1893
Location: Oklahoma City
Schools: Hard Knocks
Followers: 27

Kudos [?]: 399 [0], given: 32

GMAT Tests User
Re: asteroid SC [#permalink] New post 17 Jun 2008, 08:34
What about the way the pronoun "it" is used in C makes it clearer than the other choices? I agree that the answer is C, but for a different reason. I think the use of "were to strike" is proper in C and no other choice uses it.

vksunder wrote:
Is it C.

Pronoun it does not have a clear referrent in rest of the choices.

_________________

------------------------------------
J Allen Morris
**I'm pretty sure I'm right, but then again, I'm just a guy with his head up his a$$.

Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 229
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: asteroid SC [#permalink] New post 17 Jun 2008, 11:22
Going with A by the POE ..

C,D,E - I somehow feel that "that" is not needed and is redundant here. However, i must agree that the tone of C is correct because it speaks of an unreal situation.

B - "if it would (then) could or would..." is incorrect.

Last edited by gmatcrook on 17 Jun 2008, 11:36, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 244
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: asteroid SC [#permalink] New post 17 Jun 2008, 14:48
Would go with C for the subjunctive....If it were to strike ...
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 16
Location: NEW JERSEY
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: asteroid SC [#permalink] New post 17 Jun 2008, 15:24
I'll go for A.

I think the mood expressed here is "indicative" and not "subjuctive", thereby not requiring "were" in the sentence. The content of the "If" clause here is not presupposed to be false.

Choices B, C, D, E have either subjuctive or passive/wordy constructions.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 161
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Re: asteroid SC [#permalink] New post 18 Jun 2008, 12:47
I dont know the answer. found it online in some wesite.

I vote between A and C.

But with option C

"and that, if it were to strike Earth, could do tremendous damage to part of the planet but would"

It does not seem a doubtful,hopeful statement , so can not be subjunctive mood. So were is not justified here. 'that' is also not needed.Since that in the first statement refers earth. Does not need to be parallel.


This is actullay giving a fact.It says that if asteroid strikes earth ..so and so happens..so it should be indicative mood statment.

Option A should be a better fit.
I believe answer is A.

But i am not sure.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2009
Posts: 57
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 19

Re: asteroid SC [#permalink] New post 18 Nov 2009, 18:27
Sunny143 wrote:
Whats the OA?


The OA is c.
Check asteroids-75349.html
Also cos C is subjunctive and is a ? on parallelism so 'that' is reqd.
Re: asteroid SC   [#permalink] 18 Nov 2009, 18:27
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. New 17. Scientists calculated that the asteroid, traveling at kpadma 0 07 Nov 2010, 10:08
New posts 1 Scientists have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF19, that is drdas 5 02 Oct 2004, 15:45
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. New Scientists calculated that the asteroid, traveling at 46,000 willget800 0 14 Jan 2006, 06:04
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. New Scientists calculated that the asteroid, traveling at 46,000 Swagatalakshmi 0 23 Oct 2006, 07:16
New posts 1 Scientist have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF19, that is Viren 9 29 Aug 2009, 07:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Scientists have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF19, that is

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.