Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Scientists typically do their most creative work before the [#permalink]
15 Jul 2005, 09:08
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Scientists typically do their most creative work before the age of forty. It is commonly thought that this happens because aging by itself brings about a loss of creative capacity. However, a study has found that almost all scientists who produce highly creative work beyond the age of forty entered their fields late and less than a dozen years before their creative breakthroughs. Since creative breakthroughs by scientists under forty also generally occur within a dozen years of the scientistâ€™s entry into the field, the studyâ€™s finding strongly suggests that the real reason why scientists over forty rarely produce highly creative work is not due to age but rather because most have spent too long in their fields. In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first is the position that the argument as a whole defends; the second is evidence that is advanced as part of that defense.
B. The first and second are both claims that have been advanced in support of a position that the argument as a whole opposes.
C. The first is an explanation that the argument challenges; the second provides evidence in support of a competing explanation that the argument defends.
D. The first is an explanation that the argument challenges; the second is evidence that has been used against an alternative explanation that the argument defends.
E. The first is an explanation that the argument defends; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge that explanation.
the author is challenging the first argument, which is based on first bold face. second boldface is used as an evidence to support an alternative explanation of creative work and the alt explanation is that the creativity is not a function of age but a function of a time that the sceientists' spend on the research work.
i have a request to all you guys to please post as many BF CR as possible. thanx..
The first bold face highlights the first theory that age accounts for the loss of creativity. The argument refutes this theory, and provides evidence in the second boldface, that it is actually the number of years put in by the scientist that accounts for the loss of creativity.
Check out this awesome article about Anderson on Poets Quants, http://poetsandquants.com/2015/01/02/uclas-anderson-school-morphs-into-a-friendly-tech-hub/ . Anderson is a great place! Sorry for the lack of updates recently. I...