fstep wrote:
rhyme wrote:
Not doomed... studying is key... if you took it "cold" and scored 480, I don't see why the 600s wouldnt be in reach with some serious (e.g. 2 hours daily) studying
People have made big leaps.
420 to 700:
from-420-to-700-it-is-good-to-be-part-of-the-700-club-35919.html510 to 710:
520-to-710-my-adventures-with-the-gmat-94495.htmlwell i don't think 600 is out of reach but isn't that too low to get into a worthy program? i heard that any school out of the top 20 takes like over 10 years just to make the investment back
( Just for clarity, I meant a score "in the" 600s, not exactly 600 itself, but I'll answer the q )
Define "worthy"..... It really depends what you want to get out of the experience -- if your goal is to learn some new stuff and apply to the business you already have, then "worthy" is pretty broad and a number of schools would fit the bill. MBA programs are pretty cookie-cutter in the academic department, you are going to learn many of the same frameworks, concepts, and ideas regardless of where you end up. A score in the 600s would put you squarely into the range for a number of good schools - Georgetown University for instance has a middle 80% range GMAT scores from 640 to 730 (which is actually quite high for it's rank). Duke (Fuqua) another quite well respected program sits at 620 to 750 for the 80% range. UNC, 600 to 740. Carnegie Mellon, 620 to 750.
If your goal is to quit your job and make a move to investment banking, say at Goldman Sachs, then the "worthy" list is much smaller - admittedly, for such a goal your list would need to be Harvard, Wharton, Chicago, Kellogg, Stanford, Sloan, and a few others -- here, the mean GMAT is likely 700 or 710. Booths 80% range is 660 to 760 for instance.
So I'd make a few points.
First, note that a "mid 600s" score puts you within shooting distance of a number of programs and perhaps even some of the "top" programs (with a little effort and a little luck). Look not just at the median or mean scores but at the ranges too.
Second, recognize that the GMAT is something that can be beat -- not entirely of course (I never did get some of the math) but determination and studying can go a long way towards cracking that nut. Honestly, perseverance and drive are half the battle.
Third, timing - you self imposed 3 months. Your GMAT doesn't have to be done in 3 months - I'm a bit out of the loop with current application deadlines so perhaps someone else can comment but I would be of the opinion that four or five is still plausible for round two applications.