Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Oldest

Best Reply

Author

Message

TAGS:

Director

Joined: 25 Aug 2007

Posts: 958

WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT

WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain

Followers: 38

Kudos [?]: 559 [0], given: 40

Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [#permalink]

05 May 2010, 04:27

00:00

Question Stats:

11% (01:42) correct

88% (00:20) wrong

based on 9 sessions

Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires anyone who buys more than 5 percent of a company’s stock make a public disclosure of the purchase.
(A) make
(B) will also make
(C) to make
(D) must make
(E) must then make
_________________

Want to improve your CR: cr-methods-an-approach-to-find-the-best-answers-93146.html
Tricky Quant problems: 50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

Intern

Joined: 05 May 2010

Posts: 38

Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 21

Re: Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [#permalink]

05 May 2010, 04:59

c) to make

in this sense: the act requires a person...to make a public disclosure.

SVP

Joined: 17 Feb 2010

Posts: 1568

Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 6

Re: Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [#permalink]

05 May 2010, 12:19

'make' is incorrect with 'anyone'

only (C) makes sense.

Intern

Joined: 06 Mar 2010

Posts: 20

Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [1] , given: 1

Re: Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [#permalink]

05 May 2010, 13:32

This post received
KUDOS

require :

either take : that + command subjunctive
or take : to + bare form of verb

as no that will take infinitive:

IMO C

OA Please !!

Director

Joined: 25 Aug 2007

Posts: 958

WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT

WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain

Followers: 38

Kudos [?]: 559 [0], given: 40

Re: Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [#permalink]

05 May 2010, 21:57

SS1988,

Can you give some examples on your reasons?

I think that will be great.

SS1988 wrote:

require :

either take : that + command subjunctive
or take : to + bare form of verb

as no that will take infinitive:

IMO C

OA Please !!

_________________

CR Forum Moderator

Joined: 02 Oct 2009

Posts: 469

Location: Bangalore,India

WE 1: 4yrs in IT Industry

Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 268

Re: Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [#permalink]

05 May 2010, 23:45

SS1988 wrote:

require :

either take : that + command subjunctive
or take : to + base form of verb

as no that will take infinitive:

IMO C

OA Please !!

Require needs subjunctive mode.(the verb to be in Base form)

the above explanation is good(if thats not sufficient please PM me,I can provide with some link for subjunctive mode.

Manager

Joined: 14 Apr 2010

Posts: 241

Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 1

Re: Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [#permalink]

07 Jul 2010, 22:37

IMO A. subjunctive mood always takes "that + infinitive form"..... without "to".
what is the OA?

Manager

Joined: 04 Feb 2010

Posts: 204

Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 8

Re: Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [#permalink]

07 Jul 2010, 23:18

C here. Require can actually take on the command subjunctive or the infinitive as per MGMAT.

Forum Moderator

Status: doing good things...

Joined: 02 Jul 2009

Posts: 1234

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance

Schools: INSEAD Jan '13, IMD '15

GMAT 1: Q V
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V35

GPA: 3.77

WE: Corporate Finance (Other)

Followers: 126

Kudos [?]: 419 [0], given: 523

Re: Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [#permalink]

13 Sep 2010, 08:40

Quote:

require :

either take : that + command subjunctive
or take : to + bare form of verb

Guys, I need help, please advise me.

Are both of these sentences correct? if I apply both rules?

1.Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires anyone who buys more than 5 percent of a company’s stock to make a public disclosure of the purchase.
2. Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires that anyone who buys more than 5 percent of a company’s stock make a public disclosure of the purchase.

so the constructions are:
1.command verb THAT + be or verb without infinitive (is it bare infinitive?)
2.comman verb + to verb
_________________

Follow me, if you find my explanations useful.

Audaces fortuna juvat!

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

Manager

Joined: 08 Feb 2010

Posts: 144

Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [#permalink]

14 Sep 2010, 20:33

I chose A but command subjuctive needs that so C is correct

Re: Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [#permalink] 14 Sep 2010, 20:33

		Similar topics	Author	Replies	Last post
Similar Topics:		Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934	saurya_s	11	16 Feb 2005, 15:13
		Securities act	dreamgmat1	9	11 Jul 2007, 22:09
		The National Security Act of 1947 created a national	eyunni	5	19 Nov 2007, 20:18
		The National Security Act of 1947 created a national	rohitgoel15	9	21 Jul 2010, 05:26
	1	Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934	malkov	3	09 May 2012, 04:17

Main navigation

GMAT Resources

Partners

MBA Resources

GMAT ® is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council ® (GMAC ®). GMAT Club's website has not been reviewed or endorsed by GMAC.

GMAT Courses

Admissions Consulting

Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Main navigation

GMAT Resources

Partners

MBA Resources