|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 19 Apr 2010
Posts: 16
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 3
|
See the attachment [#permalink]
 19 Apr 2010, 02:44
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
100% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
See the attachment
Attachments
![Untitled[1]..jpg](./download/file.php?id=11255&sid=e384cf9138b7709f50b2c332d509fe03 "Untitled[1]..jpg")
Untitled[1]..jpg [ 54.17 KiB | Viewed 479 times ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 13 Dec 2009
Posts: 132
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
161
[1] , given: 10
|
Re: Need explaination to the answers [#permalink]
19 Apr 2010, 05:01
1
This post received
KUDOS
targetMBA11 wrote: Right i agree with you. Can you throw some light on option C . why this one is wron well it's difficult to put in words why option C is wrong, let me try  author is concerned about whether method is right or wrong not about how strongly or weakly it supports the out come. btw what is OA. please consider giving kudos if the discussion helped .. thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 13 Dec 2009
Posts: 132
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
161
[0], given: 10
|
Re: Need explaination to the answers [#permalink]
19 Apr 2010, 04:21
targetMBA11 wrote: See the attachment The flaw in reasoning is as mentioned in options A. A says that since studies were found flawed this implies that irradiated food is not safe. but even studies are flawed it is quite possible that irradiated food is safe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 19 Apr 2010
Posts: 16
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 3
|
Re: Need explaination to the answers [#permalink]
19 Apr 2010, 04:30
einstein10 wrote: targetMBA11 wrote: See the attachment The flaw in reasoning is as mentioned in options A. A says that since studies were found flawed this implies that irradiated food is not safe. but even studies are flawed it is quite possible that irradiated food is safe. Hi can you please elaborate on your explanation please.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 13 Dec 2009
Posts: 132
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
161
[0], given: 10
|
Re: Need explaination to the answers [#permalink]
19 Apr 2010, 04:47
targetMBA11 wrote: Hi can you please elaborate on your explanation please. lets concentrate on option A. we are looking flaw in activists reasoning. Activist says that irradiated food is not safe because the method( used to establish food is safe ) itself is not valid, so this implies that food is not safe. in simple word, lets say I established some statement to be true using some method, latter i came to know that the method i used was wrong. This does not mean that the established statement is wrong, it's quite possible that statement is true. which can be validated with some correct method. hope this helps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 19 Apr 2010
Posts: 16
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 3
|
Re: Need explaination to the answers [#permalink]
19 Apr 2010, 04:52
einstein10 wrote: targetMBA11 wrote: Hi can you please elaborate on your explanation please. lets concentrate on option A. we are looking flaw in activists reasoning. Activist says that irradiated food is not safe because the method( used to establish food is safe ) itself is not valid, so this implies that food is not safe. in simple word, lets say I established some statement to be true using some method, latter i came to know that the method i used was wrong. This does not mean that the established statement is wrong, it's quite possible that statement is true. which can be validated with some correct method. hope this helps. Right i agree with you. Can you throw some light on option C . why this one is wron
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 19 Apr 2010
Posts: 16
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 3
|
Re: Need explaination to the answers [#permalink]
19 Apr 2010, 05:11
einstein10 wrote: targetMBA11 wrote: Right i agree with you. Can you throw some light on option C . why this one is wron well it's difficult to put in words why option C is wrong, let me try author is concerned about whether method is right or wrong not about how strongly or weakly it supports the out come. btw what is OA. please consider giving kudos if the discussion helped .. thanks OA is A ... one question why people here are after receiving Kudo's ( im new to forum . sorry of its a silly one )
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 13 Dec 2009
Posts: 132
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
161
[0], given: 10
|
Re: Need explaination to the answers [#permalink]
19 Apr 2010, 05:15
targetMBA11 wrote: einstein10 wrote: targetMBA11 wrote: Right i agree with you. Can you throw some light on option C . why this one is wron well it's difficult to put in words why option C is wrong, let me try author is concerned about whether method is right or wrong not about how strongly or weakly it supports the out come. btw what is OA. please consider giving kudos if the discussion helped .. thanks OA is A ... one question why people here are after receiving Kudo's ( im new to forum . sorry of its a silly one ) please follow following link http://gmatclub.com/forum/kudos-points-on-gmatclub-forum-79704.htmlin short it shows, how valuable discussion was. thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Need explaination to the answers
[#permalink]
19 Apr 2010, 05:15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|
close
