Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 03 May 2015, 04:18

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 376
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 0

Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2008, 04:46
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

85% (01:35) correct 15% (00:57) wrong based on 29 sessions
633. Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that employers should retain all older workers indefinitely or show just cause for dismissal.

(A) that employers should retain all older workers
(B) that all older workers be retained by employers
(C) the retaining by employers of all older workers
(D) employers’ retention of all older workers
(E) employers to retain all older workers
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2008
Posts: 209
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: Senator Lasker [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2008, 05:11
vksunder wrote:
633. Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that employers should retain all older workers indefinitely or show just cause for dismissal.

(A) that employers should retain all older workers
(B) that all older workers be retained by employers
(C) the retaining by employers of all older workers
(D) employers’ retention of all older workers
(E) employers to retain all older workers


e.

a sounds wrong..unable to pin point why.
b passive voice.
c grammar is wrong. retaining is form of verb. retention might have made more sense
d retention is noun form. the alternative "or show" is verb. mismatch
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Posts: 274
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 1

Re: SC: Senator Lasker [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2008, 05:35
Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that employers should retain all older workers indefinitely or show just cause for dismissal.

(A) that employers should retain all older workers
(B) that all older workers be retained by employers
(C) the retaining by employers of all older workers
(D) employers’ retention of all older workers
(E) employers to retain all older workers

E is the best answer
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1573
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 202 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: Senator Lasker [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2008, 05:43
the correct form would be "require + subject + infinitive".

A is wrong because of "should".

E is the answer.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 376
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: Senator Lasker [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2008, 08:40
OA = E. Could you please explain as to why B is incorrect?

I picked B due to subjuntive rule. However, the subjunctive strucutre does not seem to be valid in this particular situation. Is it due to the fact that the verbs 'to retain' and 'show' requires parallelism?
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 13
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: Senator Lasker [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2008, 08:53
E is correct for 2 main reasons:

"require to" should be followed by subjunctive mood.
"to retain" and "(to) show" should be parallel.

Rest all of them seem to be missing these elements.
_________________

rainmaker

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Feb 2010
Posts: 13
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: SC: Senator Lasker [#permalink] New post 26 Jun 2010, 21:25
I still have doubt why E is correct and not B. As per the subjunctive definition it should have that +infinitive form of verb without to .

This clearly is satisfied by choice B , any comments ??
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Dec 2009
Posts: 420
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 93 [1] , given: 26

Re: SC: Senator Lasker [#permalink] New post 26 Jun 2010, 23:52
1
This post received
KUDOS
boros2203 wrote:
I still have doubt why E is correct and not B. As per the subjunctive definition it should have that +infinitive form of verb without to .

This clearly is satisfied by choice B , any comments ??



the reason B is wrong is because the tense is shifted to passive (i.e. be retained BY employers) and will not match the second part ([to] show just cause for dismissal), which is an active phrase.
_________________

kudos if you like me (or my post) :P

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2008
Posts: 198
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 11

Re: SC: Senator Lasker [#permalink] New post 30 Jun 2010, 08:28
vksunder wrote:
633. Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that employers should retain all older workers indefinitely or show just cause for dismissal.

(A) that employers should retain all older workers
(B) that all older workers be retained by employers
(C) the retaining by employers of all older workers
(D) employers’ retention of all older workers
(E) employers to retain all older workers


E it is.
requiring employees to retain or (to) show.
Passive voice in choice B.

Would be really good if you can underline the portion that has to be corrected.
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 3798
Followers: 424

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2015, 03:34
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that   [#permalink] 29 Jan 2015, 03:34
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic In several states, legislation has been proposed that would CharuKapoor 5 04 Feb 2013, 17:25
2 Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that aMante 1 16 Mar 2008, 02:46
The state legislature has proposed a law that would require suntaurian 6 02 Mar 2008, 20:38
Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that bmwhype2 7 15 Jul 2007, 11:32
Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that beyondinfinity 6 24 Jun 2006, 11:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.