Set 22 Q.27 : GMAT Verbal Section
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 20:09

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Set 22 Q.27

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 50
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2007, 18:05
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, has long been hunted for its meat. Having noted the manatee hunters’ expert knowledge of manatees’ habits, local conservationists are encouraging the hunters to stop hunting and instead to take tourists on boat rides to see manatees. Tourist interest is high, so the plan has
promise of achieving the twin goals of giving the former hunters a good income and helping ensure the manatees’ survival.

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt about the plan’s chance of success?
A. Many tourists who visit these parts of the Caribbean are uninterested in manatees and would not be willing to pay what the former manatee hunters would have to charge for boat rides to see manatees.
B. Recovery of the species would enable some hunting to continue without putting the manatees’ survival in jeopardy again.
C. In areas where manatees have traditionally been hunted for food, local people could easily replace the manatee meat in their diets with other foods obtained from the sea.
D. There would not be enough former manatee hunters to act as guides for all the tourists who want to see manatees.
E. To maintain their current income, manatee hunters who switched to guiding tourists would have to use far larger boats and make many more trips into the manatees’ fragile habitat than they currently do.

Cheers.
If you have any questions
New!
VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1459
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 255 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2007, 18:21
johnbaker wrote:
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, has long been hunted for its meat. Having noted the manatee hunters’ expert knowledge of manatees’ habits, local conservationists are encouraging the hunters to stop hunting and instead to take tourists on boat rides to see manatees. Tourist interest is high, so the plan has
promise of achieving the twin goals of giving the former hunters a good income and helping ensure the manatees’ survival.

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt about the plan’s chance of success?
A. Many tourists who visit these parts of the Caribbean are uninterested in manatees and would not be willing to pay what the former manatee hunters would have to charge for boat rides to see manatees.
B. Recovery of the species would enable some hunting to continue without putting the manatees’ survival in jeopardy again.
C. In areas where manatees have traditionally been hunted for food, local people could easily replace the manatee meat in their diets with other foods obtained from the sea.
D. There would not be enough former manatee hunters to act as guides for all the tourists who want to see manatees.
E. To maintain their current income, manatee hunters who switched to guiding tourists would have to use far larger boats and make many more trips into the manatees’ fragile habitat than they currently do.

Cheers.

E is correct.
"Many" in A makes A weak choice.
Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 931
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 175 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2007, 18:24
johnbaker wrote:
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, has long been hunted for its meat. Having noted the manatee hunters’ expert knowledge of manatees’ habits, local conservationists are encouraging the hunters to stop hunting and instead to take tourists on boat rides to see manatees. Tourist interest is high, so the plan has
promise of achieving the twin goals of giving the former hunters a good income and helping ensure the manatees’ survival.

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt about the plan’s chance of success?
A. Many tourists who visit these parts of the Caribbean are uninterested in manatees and would not be willing to pay what the former manatee hunters would have to charge for boat rides to see manatees.
B. Recovery of the species would enable some hunting to continue without putting the manatees’ survival in jeopardy again.
C. In areas where manatees have traditionally been hunted for food, local people could easily replace the manatee meat in their diets with other foods obtained from the sea.
D. There would not be enough former manatee hunters to act as guides for all the tourists who want to see manatees.
E. To maintain their current income, manatee hunters who switched to guiding tourists would have to use far larger boats and make many more trips into the manatees’ fragile habitat than they currently do.

Cheers.

between A and E, E is a stronger answer. We are concerned with what the plan has to offer: achieving the twin goals of giving the former hunters a good income and helping ensure the manatees’ survival.

the problem with A is that it is only possibly adversely affecting the hunter's income. in E, it is both affecting the hunter's income AND endangering the manatee's survival
Manager
Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 50
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2007, 04:13
"achieveing twin goals" - i overlooked that part, now E makes more sense. Thanks beckee & bkk !!!

Cheers !!
Manager
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 161
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Oct 2007, 10:09
I picked "A"

Reason:
It affects the income of the hunters and because it affects the income and the hunters will not be making as much the hunters will resort back to hunting again and endangering the mammals.

Hunters make make money from tourists= no hunting
no money from tourists= resort back to hunting

This was my reasoning for picking A.

please explain the flaw in my reasoning if any>?
23 Oct 2007, 10:09
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Sets 2 17 Jun 2008, 12:29
set 0 07 Dec 2007, 17:52
set 2 07 Dec 2007, 16:38
SET 22 Ques 27 5 22 Oct 2007, 09:16
What are sets? 0 23 Sep 2007, 18:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by