Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 May 2013, 13:56
Customize  |  Hide

Set 22 Q.27

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 54
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Set 22 Q.27 [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2007, 19:05
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, has long been hunted for its meat. Having noted the manatee hunters’ expert knowledge of manatees’ habits, local conservationists are encouraging the hunters to stop hunting and instead to take tourists on boat rides to see manatees. Tourist interest is high, so the plan has
promise of achieving the twin goals of giving the former hunters a good income and helping ensure the manatees’ survival.

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt about the plan’s chance of success?
A. Many tourists who visit these parts of the Caribbean are uninterested in manatees and would not be willing to pay what the former manatee hunters would have to charge for boat rides to see manatees.
B. Recovery of the species would enable some hunting to continue without putting the manatees’ survival in jeopardy again.
C. In areas where manatees have traditionally been hunted for food, local people could easily replace the manatee meat in their diets with other foods obtained from the sea.
D. There would not be enough former manatee hunters to act as guides for all the tourists who want to see manatees.
E. To maintain their current income, manatee hunters who switched to guiding tourists would have to use far larger boats and make many more trips into the manatees’ fragile habitat than they currently do.







I was confused between A & E. I picked A. Please explain your answers.
Cheers.
VP
VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1478
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: Set 22 Q.27 [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2007, 19:21
johnbaker wrote:
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, has long been hunted for its meat. Having noted the manatee hunters’ expert knowledge of manatees’ habits, local conservationists are encouraging the hunters to stop hunting and instead to take tourists on boat rides to see manatees. Tourist interest is high, so the plan has
promise of achieving the twin goals of giving the former hunters a good income and helping ensure the manatees’ survival.

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt about the plan’s chance of success?
A. Many tourists who visit these parts of the Caribbean are uninterested in manatees and would not be willing to pay what the former manatee hunters would have to charge for boat rides to see manatees.
B. Recovery of the species would enable some hunting to continue without putting the manatees’ survival in jeopardy again.
C. In areas where manatees have traditionally been hunted for food, local people could easily replace the manatee meat in their diets with other foods obtained from the sea.
D. There would not be enough former manatee hunters to act as guides for all the tourists who want to see manatees.
E. To maintain their current income, manatee hunters who switched to guiding tourists would have to use far larger boats and make many more trips into the manatees’ fragile habitat than they currently do.







I was confused between A & E. I picked A. Please explain your answers.
Cheers.


E is correct.
"Many" in A makes A weak choice.
Director
Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 938
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: Set 22 Q.27 [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2007, 19:24
johnbaker wrote:
In parts of the Caribbean, the manatee, an endangered marine mammal, has long been hunted for its meat. Having noted the manatee hunters’ expert knowledge of manatees’ habits, local conservationists are encouraging the hunters to stop hunting and instead to take tourists on boat rides to see manatees. Tourist interest is high, so the plan has
promise of achieving the twin goals of giving the former hunters a good income and helping ensure the manatees’ survival.

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt about the plan’s chance of success?
A. Many tourists who visit these parts of the Caribbean are uninterested in manatees and would not be willing to pay what the former manatee hunters would have to charge for boat rides to see manatees.
B. Recovery of the species would enable some hunting to continue without putting the manatees’ survival in jeopardy again.
C. In areas where manatees have traditionally been hunted for food, local people could easily replace the manatee meat in their diets with other foods obtained from the sea.
D. There would not be enough former manatee hunters to act as guides for all the tourists who want to see manatees.
E. To maintain their current income, manatee hunters who switched to guiding tourists would have to use far larger boats and make many more trips into the manatees’ fragile habitat than they currently do.







I was confused between A & E. I picked A. Please explain your answers.
Cheers.


between A and E, E is a stronger answer. We are concerned with what the plan has to offer: achieving the twin goals of giving the former hunters a good income and helping ensure the manatees’ survival.

the problem with A is that it is only possibly adversely affecting the hunter's income. in E, it is both affecting the hunter's income AND endangering the manatee's survival
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 54
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2007, 05:13
"achieveing twin goals" - i overlooked that part, now E makes more sense. Thanks beckee & bkk !!!

Cheers !!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 161
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 23 Oct 2007, 11:09
I picked "A"

Reason:
It affects the income of the hunters and because it affects the income and the hunters will not be making as much the hunters will resort back to hunting again and endangering the mammals.

Hunters make make money from tourists= no hunting
no money from tourists= resort back to hunting


This was my reasoning for picking A.


please explain the flaw in my reasoning if any>?
  [#permalink] 23 Oct 2007, 11:09
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts Challenge 1 - Q27 deowl 15 09 Jun 2006, 04:18
New posts SET 22 Ques 27 s_positive 5 22 Oct 2007, 10:16
Popular new posts 7 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC M03 Q27 cramya 27 25 Dec 2008, 04:31
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. New m10, q27 jainanurag78 1 06 Jul 2010, 19:59
New posts Overlapping Set M22 anuu 2 18 Mar 2012, 08:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Set 22 Q.27

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.