Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Set M contains numbers that satisfy the condition that, if [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Sep 2012, 04:54

4

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

47% (01:35) correct
53% (00:45) wrong based on 169 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Set M contains numbers that satisfy the condition that, if integer x is in the set then x+3 will also be in the set M. If -4 is one of the value in the set, which of the following numbers must also be present in the set M.

I. -7 II. -1 III. 2

A. I only B. II only C. I and II only D. II and III only E. I, II and III

Re: Set M contains numbers that satisfy the condition that, if [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Sep 2012, 05:09

1

This post received KUDOS

If -4 is part of the list, then -4+3(i.e -1) & -1+3(i.e 2) "MUST" be part of the set. Whereas -4-3(i.e -7) "COULD" be a part of the list Hence D is the answer.
_________________

I will rather do nothing than be busy doing nothing - Zen saying

Set M contains numbers that satisfy the condition that, if integer x is in the set then x+3 will also be in the set M. If -4 is one of the value in the set, which of the following numbers must also be present in the set M.

I. -7 II. -1 III. 2

A. I only B. II only C. I and II only D. II and III only E. I, II and III

Notice that we are asked "which of the following numbers MUST also be present in the set M" not "COULD be in the set".

Now, if -4 is in the set, then -4+3=-1 must be in the set. Since -1 is in the set then -1+3=2 must be in the set. Could -7 be in the set? Certainly, but we don't know that for sure.

Re: Set M contains numbers that satisfy the condition that, if [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Dec 2014, 04:10

Pansi wrote:

If -4 is part of the list, then -4+3(i.e -1) & -1+3(i.e 2) "MUST" be part of the set. Whereas -4-3(i.e -7) "COULD" be a part of the list Hence D is the answer.

why -7 could be in the list? Why not must? why can't we use the rule backward?

If -4 is part of the list, then -4+3(i.e -1) & -1+3(i.e 2) "MUST" be part of the set. Whereas -4-3(i.e -7) "COULD" be a part of the list Hence D is the answer.

why -7 could be in the list? Why not must? why can't we use the rule backward?

thanks

If integer x is in the set then x+3 will also be in the set does NOT mean that the reverse must be true.

If integer x is in the set then x+3 will also be in the set does NOT mean that if integer x+3 is in the set then x must also be in the set.

Re: Set M contains numbers that satisfy the condition that, if [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Dec 2015, 06:58

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...