I have a clearifying question about set theory formulas, if you all don't mind.
1. For 3 sets A, B, and C: P(AuBuC) = P(A) + P(B) + P(C) – P(AnB) – P(AnC) – P(BnC) + P(AnBnC)
2. No of persons in atleast one set = P(A) + P(B) + P(C) - P(AnB) - P(AnC) - P(BnC) + 2 P(AnBnC)
Why these two formulas are different? Isn't "at least in one set" equal to union of all (AuBuC)?
I think first one is good for at least one person as well.
No idea where can we use the second formula.
Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership