|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 136
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GMAT 2: 720 Q48 V40
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
37
[0], given: 23
|
Set Theory Question [#permalink]
 21 Feb 2012, 12:06
Let's say I have a question like this:
I have 3 different groups A, B and C and now I'm given the percentages of how many people are in each group. There can also be people in 2 groups or in all three groups and I have information about the number of people who are in two groups. If the question ask how many people are in all groups, I can use the following formula:
100 = A + B + C – [AB + AC + BC] – [2*ALL]
But my question is why do you have to subtract the number of people in all three groups twice? Can anybody elaborate on that please?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club team member
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 11611
Followers: 1801
Kudos [?]:
9597
[0], given: 829
|
Re: Set Theory Question [#permalink]
21 Feb 2012, 12:20
BN1989 wrote: Let's say I have a question like this:
I have 3 different groups A, B and C and now I'm given the percentages of how many people are in each group. There can also be people in 2 groups or in all three groups and I have information about the number of people who are in two groups. If the question ask how many people are in all groups, I can use the following formula:
100 = A + B + C – [AB + AC + BC] – [2*ALL]
But my question is why do you have to subtract the number of people in all three groups twice? Can anybody elaborate on that please? The following post addresses exactly the question you have: formulae-for-3-overlapping-sets-69014.html#p729340Hope it helps.
_________________
PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!
RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory
COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. NEW!!!
DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set. NEW!!!
What are GMAT Club Tests?
25 extra-hard Quant Tests
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 136
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GMAT 2: 720 Q48 V40
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
37
[0], given: 23
|
Re: Set Theory Question [#permalink]
21 Feb 2012, 12:32
Yes it does. Thanks a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 13 Jan 2012
Posts: 42
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Set Theory Question [#permalink]
22 Feb 2012, 10:05
Let's say you had two intersecting sets...A and B; and you would like to calculate A union B.
How would you do it?
..... A + B - (A intersection B). Right?
Now, ask yourself why did you subtract (A intersection B) just once?
... because when you added A and B, the common element (A intersection B) got counted twice. You needed it just once, so you subtracted it once.
Applying the same logic, to three sets:
When you calculate [A union B union C] by adding A + B + C, the (A intersection B intersection C) piece gets counted three times. You need it accounted for just once, so you subtract it twice.
Makes sense?
[Kudos, please]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Set Theory Question
[#permalink]
22 Feb 2012, 10:05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
close
