BDSunDevil wrote:

statement 2 gives us 2 possibilities: 234 or 123 [different positive numbers arranged in ascending order] Not sufficient

together: since K*L*M is multiple of 6, 123 is the only possibilities.

C

I don't think this is correct.

The only 3 consecutive positive integer combination under 5 could be 1,2,3 or 2,3,4.

Statement 1 also gives you the same 2 possibilities. K*L*M could be 1*2*3 = 6 a multiple of 6.

2*3*4 = 24 (also a multiple of 6). NOT SUFFICIENT.

Statement 2 is saying that it has 2 different primes and 2,3 are in both, so again, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT.

1) & 2) combined don't help as both still give you either 1,2,3 or 2,3,4 and the means will be different depending on which 3 numbers k,l,m are.

OA should be E.