|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Posts: 477
Location: Lungi
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them > [#permalink]
 07 May 2004, 02:53
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them
> to perform specified actions on a certain fixed
> date, with the actions of each conditional on
> simultaneous action taken by the other countries.
> Each country was also to notify the six other
> countries when it had completed its action.
>
> The simultaneous-action provision of the treaty
> leaves open the possibility that
>
> (A) the compliance date was subject to postponement,
> according to the terms of the treaty
>
> (B) one of the countries might not be required to
> make any changes or take any steps in order to
> comply with the treaty, whereas all the other
> countries are so required.
>
> (C) each country might have a well-founded excuse,
> based on the provision, for its own lack of
> compliance
>
> (D) the treaty specified that the signal for one of
> the countries to initiate action was notification by
> the other countries that they had completed action
>
> (E) there was ambiguity with respect to the date
> after which all actions contemplated in the treaty
> are to be complete.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4441
Followers: 10
Kudos [?]:
81
[0], given: 0
|
C it is
Each country may excuse itself by claiming that other countries did not simultaneously sign the treaty in question
_________________
Best Regards,
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 428
Location: India
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Yeah! C is the best
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|
close
