Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 03 Dec 2016, 08:01
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 89
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Dec 2006, 23:10
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to perform specified actions on a certain fixed date, with the actions of each conditional on simultaneous action taken by the other countries. Each country was also to notify the six other countries when it had completed its action.
The simultaneous-action provision of the treaty leaves open the possibility that
(A) the compliance date was subject to postponement, according to the terms of the treaty
(B) one of the countries might not be required to make any changes or take any steps in order to comply with the treaty, whereas all the other countries are so required
(C) each country might have a well-founded excuse, based on the provision, for its own lack of compliance
(D) the treaty specified that the signal for one of the countries to initiate action was notification by the other countries that they had completed action
(E) there was ambiguity with respect to the date after which all actions contemplated in the treaty are to be complete
Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Nov 2006
Posts: 268
Location: California
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 189 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2006, 00:53
My pick D.. based on POE..
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 217
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2006, 02:03
Either D or E :roll:

Anyway I will gor for D ...based on POE :lol:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 177
Location: uk
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2006, 02:58
by POE D !
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1415
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 169 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2006, 08:57
there was no ambiguity since there was a fixed date, hence can't be E

D is the answer
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 714
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2006, 09:18
D seems the right answer
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 921
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2006, 10:07
I got this wrong the last time, think about it, doesn't D just repeat what the argument says? Fill in the blanks...The simultaneous-action provision of the treaty leaves open the possibility that ....which makes more sense?
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 1559
Location: Ann Arbor
Schools: Ross '10
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 189 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2006, 15:50
hsampath wrote:
I got this wrong the last time, think about it, doesn't D just repeat what the argument says? Fill in the blanks...The simultaneous-action provision of the treaty leaves open the possibility that ....which makes more sense?


I second this. I also think that D is just repeating the passage.

I go for B through POE.
_________________

My Profile/GMAT/MBA Story
http://www.gmatclub.com/forum/111-t59345

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1415
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 169 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2006, 16:51
ncprasad wrote:
hsampath wrote:
I got this wrong the last time, think about it, doesn't D just repeat what the argument says? Fill in the blanks...The simultaneous-action provision of the treaty leaves open the possibility that ....which makes more sense?


I second this. I also think that D is just repeating the passage.

I go for B through POE.


generally speaking, the most dull and obvious answer is usually the correct one... especially with inference questions. :roll:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 921
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2006, 10:23
ncprasad wrote:
hsampath wrote:
I got this wrong the last time, think about it, doesn't D just repeat what the argument says? Fill in the blanks...The simultaneous-action provision of the treaty leaves open the possibility that ....which makes more sense?


I second this. I also think that D is just repeating the passage.

I go for B through POE.


It's not just one country, every country can do it. And the answer is....

:)
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 1559
Location: Ann Arbor
Schools: Ross '10
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 189 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2006, 11:35
hsampath wrote:
ncprasad wrote:
hsampath wrote:
I got this wrong the last time, think about it, doesn't D just repeat what the argument says? Fill in the blanks...The simultaneous-action provision of the treaty leaves open the possibility that ....which makes more sense?


I second this. I also think that D is just repeating the passage.

I go for B through POE.


It's not just one country, every country can do it. And the answer is....

:)


Hmm. Good point. C seems the best choice.
_________________

My Profile/GMAT/MBA Story
http://www.gmatclub.com/forum/111-t59345

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 89
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2006, 23:54
C is the answer .. I was not able to figure out why?
  [#permalink] 21 Dec 2006, 23:54
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
48 Experts publish their posts in the topic Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to puma 31 25 Aug 2008, 10:12
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to tarek99 7 24 Dec 2007, 02:28
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to IrinaOK 3 17 Sep 2007, 16:19
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to Amit05 7 03 Jul 2007, 12:20
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to amd08 4 04 Apr 2007, 15:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.