Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Oct 2014, 07:41

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1551
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 235 [0], given: 1

Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2007, 02:28
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to perform specified actions on a certain fixed date, with the actions of each conditional on simultaneous action taken by the other countries. Each country was also to notify the six other countries when it had completed its action.

The simultaneous-action provision of the treaty leaves open the possibility that

(A) the compliance date was subject to postponement, according to the terms of the treaty

(B) one of the countries might not be required to make any changes or take any steps in order to comply with the treaty, whereas all the other countries are so required

(C) each country might have a well-founded excuse, based on the provision, for its own lack of compliance

(D) the treaty specified that the signal for one of the countries to initiate action was notification by the other countries that they had completed action

(E) there was ambiguity with respect to the date after which all actions contemplated in the treaty are to be complete

Please explain your answer
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 647
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Seven Countries [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2007, 04:16
tarek99 wrote:
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to perform specified actions on a certain fixed date, with the actions of each conditional on simultaneous action taken by the other countries. Each country was also to notify the six other countries when it had completed its action.

The simultaneous-action provision of the treaty leaves open the possibility that

(A) the compliance date was subject to postponement, according to the terms of the treaty

(B) one of the countries might not be required to make any changes or take any steps in order to comply with the treaty, whereas all the other countries are so required

(C) each country might have a well-founded excuse, based on the provision, for its own lack of compliance

(D) the treaty specified that the signal for one of the countries to initiate action was notification by the other countries that they had completed action

(E) there was ambiguity with respect to the date after which all actions contemplated in the treaty are to be complete

Please explain your answer


How about 'B'

On second thoughts I find 'D' better. hence 'D' will be my choice
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 54
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2007, 18:39
I chose answer choice D as well.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1102
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Seven Countries [#permalink] New post 25 Dec 2007, 02:11
If each country was also to notify the six other countries when it had completed its action, the fixed date could be put off....so A seems correct. D doesn't seem right because the activity could also be simoultaneous

OA???
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 120
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 25 Dec 2007, 03:19
Since action of each country is conditional on simultaneous actions by other countries, it creates a dependency cycle. Each country can avoid an action due to this condition. Hence, each country will have an excuse for its lack of compliance.
I go for C.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Dec 2007
Posts: 87
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 27 Dec 2007, 07:34
I also like "C"..
"A" does not seem correct. We have "fixed dates", meaning that it has already been decided on the them.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 48
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Seven Countries [#permalink] New post 27 Dec 2007, 08:32
tarek99 wrote:
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to perform specified actions on a certain fixed date, with the actions of each conditional on simultaneous action taken by the other countries. Each country was also to notify the six other countries when it had completed its action.

The simultaneous-action provision of the treaty leaves open the possibility that

(A) the compliance date was subject to postponement, according to the terms of the treaty- The date is fixed. No mention of postponement

(B) one of the countries might not be required to make any changes or take any steps in order to comply with the treaty, whereas all the other countries are so required-No metion of preferential treatment to one country
(C) each country might have a well-founded excuse, based on the provision, for its own lack of compliance- There is no indiaction of excuse

(D) the treaty specified that the signal for one of the countries to initiate action was notification by the other countries that they had completed action-here lies the problem. How can you notify and do the action at the same time-Correct answer
(E) there was ambiguity with respect to the date after which all actions contemplated in the treaty are to be complete- Starting date and simultaneous action is specified. No discussion on how long the action is to complete the requirements of the treatyPlease explain your answer
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 48
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 27 Dec 2007, 08:35
namurad wrote:
Since action of each country is conditional on simultaneous actions by other countries, it creates a dependency cycle. Each country can avoid an action due to this condition. Hence, each country will have an excuse for its lack of compliance.
I go for C.


I did not pick C because it is stated that the date is fixed. and the same logic applies for A
  [#permalink] 27 Dec 2007, 08:35
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to sher676 12 05 Aug 2009, 13:08
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to shahnandan 4 12 Nov 2005, 06:14
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to macca 2 21 Oct 2005, 06:06
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to rahulraao 21 18 Sep 2005, 16:46
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to WinWinMBA 6 26 Apr 2005, 15:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.