Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 08 Dec 2016, 05:03
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 174
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 13

Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2009, 13:08
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to perform specified actions on a certain fixed date, with the actions of each conditional on simultaneous action taken by the other countries. Each country was also to notify the six other countries when it had completed its action.
The simultaneous-action provision of the treaty leaves open the possibility that
(A) the compliance date was subject to postponement, according to the terms of the treaty
(B) one of the countries might not be required to make any changes or take any steps in order to comply with the treaty, whereas all the other countries are so required.
(C) each country might have a well-founded excuse, based on the provision, for its own lack of compliance
(D) the treaty specified that the signal for one of the countries to initiate action was notification by the other countries that they had completed action
(E) there was ambiguity with respect to the date after which all actions contemplated in the treaty are to be complete
Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2009
Posts: 299
Concentration: Nonprofit, Strategy
GPA: 3.42
WE: Engineering (Computer Hardware)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 9

Re: 7 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2009, 16:15
I think the intended answer here might be D...as if all countries are waiting for other countries to finish signal their start, then nothing will be started
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 174
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 13

Re: 7 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2009, 16:44
Thats not it.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2009
Posts: 299
Concentration: Nonprofit, Strategy
GPA: 3.42
WE: Engineering (Computer Hardware)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 9

Re: 7 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2009, 17:07
ahh, now i think i kind of get it...

since passage states "with the actions of each conditional on simultaneous action taken by the other countries"...so the assume last guy gets the trigger from the second last country's finish, but no other country is provisioning that it must start its action....so it could give any random execuses and not do anything...so C looks more promising now?...wow this one is tough...thanks for the good question! dont post OA if I get it right on 2nd try plz, i wanna see other people's arguments too, cause this one is just outright confusing...
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 44
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: 7 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2009, 19:05
IMO C
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: ACA, CPA
Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Posts: 441
Location: Vagabond
Schools: BC
WE 1: Big4, Audit
WE 2: Banking
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 41

Re: 7 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2009, 19:19
sher676 wrote:
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to perform specified actions on a certain fixed date, with the actions of each conditional on simultaneous action taken by the other countries. Each country was also to notify the six other countries when it had completed its action.
The simultaneous-action provision of the treaty leaves open the possibility that
(A) the compliance date was subject to postponement, according to the terms of the treaty - Irrelevant
(B) one of the countries might not be required to make any changes or take any steps in order to comply with the treaty, whereas all the other countries are so required.Irrelevant
(C) each country might have a well-founded excuse, based on the provision, for its own lack of compliance - Looks right
(D) the treaty specified that the signal for one of the countries to initiate action was notification by the other countries that they had completed action
(E) there was ambiguity with respect to the date after which all actions contemplated in the treaty are to be complete
Irrelevant Nothing with regard to date has been given for E
_________________

If you have made mistakes, there is always another chance for you. You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing we call "failure" is not the falling down, but the staying down.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 174
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 13

Re: 7 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2009, 21:08
OA is C
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2009
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: 7 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Oct 2009, 21:50
Whats wrong with A?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 174
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 13

Re: 7 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Oct 2009, 22:02
chiraagb wrote:
Whats wrong with A?



No mention of compliance at all in the statement. Rule of thumb is never pick an answer which is not clearly discussed in the statement. If you have to make a huge leap of reasoning to make it work, it is always wrong.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2009
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: 7 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Oct 2009, 23:19
IMO C. we don't know which country would be the first to start the action.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2008
Posts: 169
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 39

Re: 7 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Oct 2009, 22:41
Quote:
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to perform specified actions on a certain fixed date, with the actions of each conditional on simultaneous action taken by the other countries. Each country was also to notify the six other countries when it had completed its action.
The simultaneous-action provision of the treaty leaves open the possibility that
(A) the compliance date was subject to postponement, according to the terms of the treaty - more of a result
(B) one of the countries might not be required to make any changes or take any steps in order to comply with the treaty, whereas all the other countries are so required. more of conclusion
(C) each country might have a well-founded excuse, based on the provision, for its own lack of compliance this correct as it is overseen in the argument
(D) the treaty specified that the signal for one of the countries to initiate action was notification by the other countries that they had completed action inference
(E) there was ambiguity with respect to the date after which all actions contemplated in the treaty are to be complete
- can be infered from the statements
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2008
Posts: 169
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 39

Re: 7 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Oct 2009, 22:43
so c is the ans
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2009
Posts: 59
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 9

Re: 7 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Oct 2009, 02:42
manojgmat wrote:
so c is the ans


C seems ok to me. But E seems ok too :?:

The simultaneous action plan does not resolve the ambiguity mentioned in E.
Re: 7   [#permalink] 05 Oct 2009, 02:42
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
48 Experts publish their posts in the topic Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to puma 31 25 Aug 2008, 10:12
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to tarek99 7 24 Dec 2007, 02:28
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to IrinaOK 3 17 Sep 2007, 16:19
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to Amit05 7 03 Jul 2007, 12:20
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to amd08 4 04 Apr 2007, 15:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.