Methinks it A

Evidence is the stated in the first boldface
Conclusion is stated in the second boldface.

a) Out: Not a circumstance
b) Out: The second BF is the main conclusion
d) Out: The second BF is the main conclusion
e) Out

I pick C.

I'll vote for A.

I know that C, D, E are out, because the first statement provides an explanation of the issue rather than stating evidence of any kind.
_________________

Hard work is the main determinant of success

Well this is my first post. I vote for A.

Cheers !!

I came across this today

My choice is "A" & the OA too is "A"!

Guys, i have a doubt here. (It is very late though).
I just read Paul's explanation of "inference". What I understand from his explanation is that inference is almost always true (and not true at all times).
I was always under the opinion that "Inference" is correct in the context of the passage.
Can you please help me if I am missing anything here?

However, the available information about the bank'ss condition is from reliable and informed sources, and corporate executives do sometimes buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to calm worries about their company's condition.

I would take A.
But I still have an interrogation. Why the part in green wouldnt be the main conclusion? The premise(red)is that because the information are reliable, the conclusion is that the manager do that to calm worries. And the last bold sentence would be the second conclusion("to support the main conclusion" Answer B)

I think the Answer is A

I think the right answer is A.

But I am not sure, because B might be, although I think that A is better than B.

It is a pity that we don't know the real correct answer. In the exam, I think that many peolpe as me would do guessing!!!!

Several of a certain bank’s top executives have recently been purchasing shares in their own bank.[/b] This activity has occasioned some surprise, since it is widely believed that the bank, carrying a large number of bad loans, is on the brink of collapse. Since the executives are well placed to know their bank’s true condition, it might seem that their share purchases show that the danger of collapse is exaggerated. However, the available information about the bank’s condition is from reliable and informed sources, and corporate executives do sometimes buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to calm worries about their company’s condition. On balance, therefore, it is likely that the executives of the bank are following this example.
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first describes the circumstance the explanation of which is the issue that the argument addresses; the second states the main conclusion of the argument. does not seem to be fit the first explanation part

B. The first describes the circumstance the explanation of which is the issue the argument addresses; the second states a conclusion that is drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the argument. no both related to the stimulus

C. The first provides evidence to defend the position that the argument seeks to establish against opposing positions; the second states the main conclusion of the argument. seems the one

D. The first provides evidence to support the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second states a conclusion that is drawn in order to support the argument’s main conclusion. not the second

E. Each provides evidence to support the position that the argument seeks to establish. does not seems likely to be

I got down to C and E but my in my opinion I would chose C
_________________

“If money is your hope for independence you will never have it. The only real security that a man will have in this world is a reserve of knowledge, experience, and ability.â€