ShopperKing and FoodBasket : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 02 Dec 2016, 09:59

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# ShopperKing and FoodBasket

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 127
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 12

ShopperKing and FoodBasket [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2009, 06:48
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

67% (01:48) correct 33% (00:00) wrong based on 6 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Well, the answer is already marked in the attached image. I need to know the reason behind it.
Attachments

as.JPG [ 116.66 KiB | Viewed 1452 times ]

If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1353
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 236 [0], given: 10

Re: ShopperKing and FoodBasket [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2009, 03:11
Type:Paradox
Look for an answer which resolves both the sides of the argument.
Here it is, why shoppers wont be able to save money when they shop in either of the super markets is in contention.

So answer should be related to the kind of item purchased and their prices by the shoppers.

By POE : A and B .

B: paraphrase of the premise in the argument that the average price is 5% more in one of the markets. Dosen't resolve how shoppers are unable to save money.

A: If shoppers purchase the items is bulk from either markets the money spent will not be much different as mentioned by the statement.Hence No savings. Resolves.

Hence A.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 127
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 12

Re: ShopperKing and FoodBasket [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2009, 22:59
I am still inclear.

B can also state that only if a shopper buys more than 20 items, he/she will have to pay 5%more .. isn't it?
Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 235
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 25

Re: ShopperKing and FoodBasket [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2009, 09:57
A fits the bill

The correct answer choice must effectively convey the contrast (brought about by nevertheless), which goes to point that it is not the overall price saving that the consumer is looking for at Foodbasket but something else.

A effectively conveys that, consumers are only concerned with savings on items that they purchase most often (essential) in which case Foodbasket is cheaper. That means that even if the prices of other items at Foodbasket were to be higher than Shopperking, the consumer would still purchase at Foodbasket. They have purposely kept the sample data pointed out to have lower overall price to highlight that It is coincidental.

Hope this helps

Consider kudos for the post
Re: ShopperKing and FoodBasket   [#permalink] 16 Nov 2009, 09:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# ShopperKing and FoodBasket

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.