Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 27 Feb 2015, 17:58

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

ShopperKing and FoodBasket

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 127
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 12

ShopperKing and FoodBasket [#permalink] New post 25 Oct 2009, 06:48
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

67% (01:48) correct 33% (00:00) wrong based on 3 sessions
Well, the answer is already marked in the attached image. I need to know the reason behind it.
Attachments

as.JPG
as.JPG [ 116.66 KiB | Viewed 1064 times ]

VP
VP
avatar
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1360
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 10

Re: ShopperKing and FoodBasket [#permalink] New post 26 Oct 2009, 03:11
Type:Paradox
Look for an answer which resolves both the sides of the argument.
Here it is, why shoppers wont be able to save money when they shop in either of the super markets is in contention.

So answer should be related to the kind of item purchased and their prices by the shoppers.

By POE : A and B .

B: paraphrase of the premise in the argument that the average price is 5% more in one of the markets. Dosen't resolve how shoppers are unable to save money.

A: If shoppers purchase the items is bulk from either markets the money spent will not be much different as mentioned by the statement.Hence No savings. Resolves.

Hence A.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 127
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 12

Re: ShopperKing and FoodBasket [#permalink] New post 26 Oct 2009, 22:59
I am still inclear.

B can also state that only if a shopper buys more than 20 items, he/she will have to pay 5%more .. isn't it?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 238
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 110 [0], given: 25

Re: ShopperKing and FoodBasket [#permalink] New post 16 Nov 2009, 09:57
A fits the bill

The correct answer choice must effectively convey the contrast (brought about by nevertheless), which goes to point that it is not the overall price saving that the consumer is looking for at Foodbasket but something else.

A effectively conveys that, consumers are only concerned with savings on items that they purchase most often (essential) in which case Foodbasket is cheaper. That means that even if the prices of other items at Foodbasket were to be higher than Shopperking, the consumer would still purchase at Foodbasket. They have purposely kept the sample data pointed out to have lower overall price to highlight that It is coincidental.

Hope this helps

Consider kudos for the post
Re: ShopperKing and FoodBasket   [#permalink] 16 Nov 2009, 09:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by

ShopperKing and FoodBasket

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.