Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Oct 2014, 19:23

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Since Byron's fingers are so short and stubby, he will never

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

Since Byron's fingers are so short and stubby, he will never [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2004, 08:04
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
Since Byron's fingers are so short and stubby, he will never be an outstanding pianist

The statement above is based on which of the following assumptions?
A) the size and shape of fingers are important attributes for a professional musical career
B) piano playing requires long, thin fingers
C) physical characteristics can affect how well one plays the piano
D) Byron is not a particularly able pianist
E) no amount of practice will make a difference in Byron's playing ability
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 187
Location: illinois
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2004, 08:36
The debate is between C and E.

The physical characteristics such as long and thin fingers play an important role in determining how well a person plays...

The "key" is "never be a outstanding" ....

In that sense E says that no matter what he does , he will never be a outstanding player. It seems more like a conclusion than an assumption to me.

I will take my chances and go wth C

C is my choice.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 656
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2004, 09:36
Can a question get any shorter , at the same time any harder, than
this one? Where did you get this Paul? This is another gem that needs
the understanding of fundamentals of logic.

Anyway, I would choose B.

Reason: In CR, never venture outside the scope of the CR.
Try to be as close to the stem as possible.
Thanks to Anand and Paul for teaching this trick!

Again, Fingers crossed!
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 May 2003
Posts: 32
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2004, 09:37
C, yes we have to find out what requires to be an outstanding player.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 187
Location: illinois
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2004, 10:01
Kpadma:

IMO, B is NOT correct, because the argument ONLy says that to BE and OUTSTANDING Player, the fingers should be longer and thinner. But for normal playing it does NOT matter. This is proved by the fact that Byron is able to play the Piano.So to be OUTSTANDING ONLY, the player requires longer and thinner, Otherwise NOT neccessary.

JUST my OPINION.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Posts: 155
Location: New York
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2004, 11:56
Absolutely C

Hmm, actually, I dont like the idea of "physical attributes", that could imply that having short legs is also important. Too general. Had the sentence been more specific, I wouldve stuck with it. E is the answer, imo. The author is assuming that no matter how much Byron practices he wont be an oustanding pianist. In other words, nothing else can make Byron an oustanding pianist. No teachers, music school, or hours of practice. We must exclude all other posibilities. That's my two cents.
_________________

---------------------------------------------------
The more I learn, the more I realize I know nothing!
----------------------------------------------------

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2004, 12:09
I will go with E.

The argument assumes that physicals shortcomings cannot be overcome by practice.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2004, 19:03
monarc wrote:
Kpadma:

IMO, B is NOT correct, because the argument ONLy says that to BE and OUTSTANDING Player, the fingers should be longer and thinner. But for normal playing it does NOT matter. This is proved by the fact that Byron is able to play the Piano.So to be OUTSTANDING ONLY, the player requires longer and thinner, Otherwise NOT neccessary.

JUST my OPINION.

Nice Monarc, refuting other people's answer helps better understanding WHY our answer is better than other ones. Great job. OA: C. Anyone up to refute E?

:fyi the latest CR questions I have taken from LSAT. You can see the increased level of difficulty. Very good practice for us all!
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Posts: 155
Location: New York
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2004, 19:12
Paul wrote:
monarc wrote:
Kpadma:

IMO, B is NOT correct, because the argument ONLy says that to BE and OUTSTANDING Player, the fingers should be longer and thinner. But for normal playing it does NOT matter. This is proved by the fact that Byron is able to play the Piano.So to be OUTSTANDING ONLY, the player requires longer and thinner, Otherwise NOT neccessary.

JUST my OPINION.

Nice Monarc, refuting other people's answer helps better understanding WHY our answer is better than other ones. Great job. OA: C. Anyone up to refute E?

:fyi the latest CR questions I have taken from LSAT. You can see the increased level of difficulty. Very good practice for us all!



Hmmm, :hammer

Lesson for many of us, try to stick to the answers that you chose. Now, E is wrong because it is not an underlying assumption. Byron can still improve (keyword) his playing, and the author will not refute this statement. While I still dont think that C is a great answer, it is the best of the worst. Had E stated that: "No amount of practice will make Byron an OUTSTANDING pianist," it would've been the best choice. IMO READ READ READ READ the answer choices properly :roof
_________________

---------------------------------------------------
The more I learn, the more I realize I know nothing!
----------------------------------------------------

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2004, 19:22
lvb9th wrote:
Paul wrote:
monarc wrote:
Kpadma:

IMO, B is NOT correct, because the argument ONLy says that to BE and OUTSTANDING Player, the fingers should be longer and thinner. But for normal playing it does NOT matter. This is proved by the fact that Byron is able to play the Piano.So to be OUTSTANDING ONLY, the player requires longer and thinner, Otherwise NOT neccessary.

JUST my OPINION.

Nice Monarc, refuting other people's answer helps better understanding WHY our answer is better than other ones. Great job. OA: C. Anyone up to refute E?

:fyi the latest CR questions I have taken from LSAT. You can see the increased level of difficulty. Very good practice for us all!



Hmmm, :hammer

Lesson for many of us, try to stick to the answers that you chose. Now, E is wrong because it is not an underlying assumption. Byron can still improve (keyword) his playing, and the author will not refute this statement. While I still dont think that C is a great answer, it is the best of the worst. Had E stated that: "No amount of practice will make Byron an OUTSTANDING pianist," it would've been the best choice. IMO READ READ READ READ the answer choices properly :roof

"improve" was indeed the key word. Very nice lvb9th :pray
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Apr 2004
Posts: 7
Location: montreal
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Apr 2004, 10:30
I would go with A because the assumption is not that ones fingers need to be long and thin, just not short and stubby
  [#permalink] 07 Apr 2004, 10:30
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Although John never means to do harm or hurt Jane, he goodyear2013 9 03 Jul 2014, 11:46
He has gone to the school since radioguy 1 08 Dec 2013, 07:10
Since Jon s range is so narrow, he will never be an gjg 7 17 Jul 2012, 21:04
Since no one returns from death, we can never be certain WinWinMBA 5 06 May 2005, 14:36
Since no one returns from death, we can never be certain nocilis 8 04 Mar 2005, 21:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Since Byron's fingers are so short and stubby, he will never

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.