Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 01 Oct 2014, 14:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Since it has become known that several of a bank s top

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 267
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 1

Since it has become known that several of a bank s top [#permalink] New post 01 Jul 2009, 08:37
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:12) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in
their own bank, the bank’s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. They might well be overoptimistic, however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s health.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument relies.
B. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion supported by the evidence.
C. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is evidence that undermines the support for this intermediate conclusion.
D. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
E. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states a further conclusion supported by this intermediate conclusion.
_________________

Choose Life

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 306
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 15

Re: Banks [#permalink] New post 01 Jul 2009, 09:09
Ans is D

again as I said - think of the answer before looking at the choices.

first part is definitely a conclusion, the second could have been anything like "refuting the conclusion", "questioning that conclusion", "doubting the conclusion" etc. Now see the choices.

A and B immediately out, bcoz first part is not an evidence at all. Evidence was - officials bought shares.

C and E state the second part to be evidence (wrong) and further conclusion (wrong) respectively. You are left with D
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 267
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 1

Re: Banks [#permalink] New post 01 Jul 2009, 09:18
rashminet84 wrote:
Ans is D

again as I said - think of the answer before looking at the choices.

first part is definitely a conclusion, the second could have been anything like "refuting the conclusion", "questioning that conclusion", "doubting the conclusion" etc. Now see the choices.

A and B immediately out, bcoz first part is not an evidence at all. Evidence was - officials bought shares.

C and E state the second part to be evidence (wrong) and further conclusion (wrong) respectively. You are left with D


Even I voted for D for the same reasons mentioned by you...But the OA says something else....
_________________

Choose Life

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 306
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 15

Re: Banks [#permalink] New post 01 Jul 2009, 09:27
It can only be B then.
first - summarizes evidence
second - intermediate conclusion supported by evidence.

but i still don't see how it is better than D :?

the major difference between B and D is that B says the the first bold part is summarizing the evidence (not an intermediate conclusion).

I feel there is some confusion as to the OA for this question.

check this site, OA is D here - http://www.beatthegmat.com/top-executives-t30273.html
There are several other forums, one even has OA as E. :o
Re: Banks   [#permalink] 01 Jul 2009, 09:27
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 Since it has become known that several of a bank's ' top perfectstranger 13 19 Aug 2009, 14:05
Since it has become known that several of a bank s top ankur55 10 22 Jul 2009, 06:04
Since it has become known that several of a bank s top rpmodi 7 25 Jun 2008, 12:13
6 Since it has become known that several of a bank s top nevergiveup 9 18 Dec 2007, 14:14
Since it has become known that several of a bank s top chairrhee 4 06 May 2006, 19:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Since it has become known that several of a bank s top

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.