Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Oct 2014, 07:51

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Since Professor Smythe has been head of the department, the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 907
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 44 [1] , given: 0

Since Professor Smythe has been head of the department, the [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2007, 00:26
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (01:49) correct 50% (01:36) wrong based on 5 sessions
Since Professor Smythe has been head of the department, the most distinguished member of the faculty has resigned, fewer new courses have been developed, student has dropped, and the reputation of the department has gone down. These facts provide conclusive evidence that Professor Smythe was appointed to undermine the department.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument

(A) overlooks the fact that something can have the reputation for being of poor quality without being of poor quality
(B) bases a general claim on a few exceptional instances
(C) assumes that because an action was followed by a change, the action was undertaken to bring about that change
(D) fails to distinguish between a decline in quantity and a decline in quality
(E) presupposes what it purports to establish
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 922
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2007, 02:11
C makes most sense here.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Dec 2006
Posts: 61
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2007, 04:59
agree with C
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Nov 2006
Posts: 129
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2007, 05:01
I vote for C
Director
Director
User avatar
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 736
Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 4

 [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2007, 07:08
one more C.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 907
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2007, 12:29
Why C?
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 190
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2007, 13:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
A) Says nothing about the Professors actual quality
B) Not really in scope and the instances don't really appear to be all that exceptional
D) This doesnt make sense

C is correct. If the question said "provide evidence that Professor Smythe has undermined the department," it would be better but still have some holes in the logic. As it is, the author is assuming that whoever was in charge of hiring the Professor had a desire to undermine the department and so hired someone who would. But the passage says nothing about the views of whoever hired him or the hiring at all. So it is assuming that the people who hired him wanted all of this to happen.
_________________

wall street...bulls, bears, people from connecticut

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 41
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [1] , given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2007, 15:54
1
This post received
KUDOS
One more for C.

Maybe the best way to look at this problem is to link the claimed cause (hiring new dept head) and the effects (resigns, dropped in classes). The argument is flawed because it provides no evidence that the Smthye caused the negative effects. In other words, the argument simply makes the assumption that Smthye was hired to bring about those problems to the department.

Take a look at choice C again and make the association that hiring Smthye is the "action" and the negative effects were the "change". Then C will make sense.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 415
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2007, 16:45
C.......

Best way to look at these types of question is to see whether there is a causalty in the conclusion...IF yes, then it may be faulty.
VP
VP
avatar
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1364
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 10

Re: CR: Professor Smythe [#permalink] New post 10 May 2011, 01:03
C fits the bill perfectly.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2010
Posts: 20
Schools: Ross,Duke,Emory
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 5

Re: CR: Professor Smythe [#permalink] New post 10 May 2011, 06:36
Should be C.

C paraphrases the situation so clearly....
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1726
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 67

Kudos [?]: 329 [0], given: 109

Re: CR: Professor Smythe [#permalink] New post 10 May 2011, 06:55
+1 C

It makes a wrong assumption about the possible causes.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 658
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 51

Re: CR: Professor Smythe [#permalink] New post 11 May 2011, 07:48
simple question, C is pretty obvious
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Re: CR: Professor Smythe   [#permalink] 11 May 2011, 07:48
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 An appeal has been made by the managers of a department tuanquang269 0 27 Jul 2014, 06:36
31 Experts publish their posts in the topic A new sales clerk in a department store has been assigned to shadabkhaniet 19 18 Apr 2012, 22:52
8 Experts publish their posts in the topic A new sales clerk in a department store has been assigned to krishnasty 3 09 Oct 2011, 00:28
Professor Chan: The literature department s undergraduate msrinath 4 10 Aug 2007, 17:08
Since 1975 there has been in the United States a dramatic VAGMAT 9 23 Apr 2007, 13:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Since Professor Smythe has been head of the department, the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.