Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Sep 2014, 22:28

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Since the passage of the state s Clean Air Act ten years

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 381
Location: Phoenix AZ
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Since the passage of the state s Clean Air Act ten years [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2006, 20:22
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Since the passage of the state’s Clean Air Act ten years ago, the level of industrial pollutants in the air has fallen by an average of 18 percent. This suggests that the restrictions on industry embodied in the act have worked effectively. However, during the same period the state has also suffered through a period of economic decline. The number of businesses in the state has fallen by 10 percent, and the number of workers employed has fallen by 12 percent. It is probable that the business decline, rather than the regulations in the act, is responsible for at least half of the decline in the pollution.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage above?
(A) During the last ten years, economic conditions in the nation as a whole have been worse than those within the state.
(B) Amendments to the Clean Air Act that were enacted six years ago have substantially strengthened its restrictions on industrial air pollution.
(C) Of the businesses that ceased operating in the state during the last ten years, only 5 percent were engaged in air-polluting industries.
(D) Several large corporations left the state during the last ten years partly in order to avoid compliance with the Clean Air Act.
(E) Due to its small budget, the state office charged with enforcement of the Clean Air Act has prosecuted only two violators of the law since its passage.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1741
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2006, 20:29
Clear winner C.

The author is concluding that the industrial decline over the last decade, may be responsible for the reduced pollution levels rather than the Clean Air Act.

If the number of industries that left town after the decline only contributed o 5 % of the pollution and the pollution decreased more than that, then the Clean air act might have soem hand in it.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 381
Location: Phoenix AZ
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2006, 20:33
sure.

oa = c
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2922
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2006, 20:39
Straight C.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1133
Location: India
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2006, 20:46
Agree with C.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 246
Location: Italy
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: CR Clean Air Act [#permalink] New post 19 Jul 2006, 01:07
the most fit solution for this question is A for the followiong reasons.....if B true this solution would address only to the first part of the passage and would mean less air polluted but does not help us to weaken the argumentation that states the partial responsability of industrial decline on air pollution,
C noes not help to weaken the argumentneither because that 5% of industries could have made up more than the 50% weighting a lot,... so is out
D uhm out strenghten the argument support the fact that less air polluted is is consequence of less companies
E out low risk to be charged strenghten argumentation

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage above?
(A) During the last ten years, economic conditions in the nation as a whole have been worse than those within the state.
(B) Amendments to the Clean Air Act that were enacted six years ago have substantially strengthened its restrictions on industrial air pollution.
(C) Of the businesses that ceased operating in the state during the last ten years, only 5 percent were engaged in air-polluting industries.
(D) Several large corporations left the state during the last ten years partly in order to avoid compliance with the Clean Air Act.
(E) Due to its small budget, the state office charged with enforcement of the Clean Air Act has prosecuted only two violators of the law since its passage.
_________________

“If money is your hope for independence you will never have it. The only real security that a man will have in this world is a reserve of knowledge, experience, and ability.â€

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 246
Location: Italy
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 19 Jul 2006, 01:12
jaynayak wrote:
Clear winner C.

The author is concluding that the industrial decline over the last decade, may be responsible for the reduced pollution levels rather than the Clean Air Act.

If the number of industries that left town after the decline only contributed o 5 % of the pollution and the pollution decreased more than that, then the Clean air act might have soem hand in it.


the point is that the 5% could be the representing the main polluter so this question could support second part of argumentation then is out
_________________

“If money is your hope for independence you will never have it. The only real security that a man will have in this world is a reserve of knowledge, experience, and ability.â€

  [#permalink] 19 Jul 2006, 01:12
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Since the passage of the state s Clean Air Act ten years sidbidus 6 18 Jun 2007, 18:01
Since the passage of the state s Clean Air Act ten years nitinneha 2 27 Mar 2007, 15:10
Since the passage of the state s Clean Air Act ten years Beegeez2 3 15 Aug 2006, 04:45
Since the passage of the state s Clean Air Act ten years ywilfred 15 07 Sep 2005, 07:26
Since the passage of the state s Clean Air Act ten years wunderbar03 7 28 Apr 2005, 06:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Since the passage of the state s Clean Air Act ten years

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.