Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 May 2013, 00:38
Customize  |  Hide

Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 318
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.7
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 67

Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected in [#permalink] New post 21 Jan 2013, 08:14
00:00

Question Stats:

50% (02:22) correct 50% (01:03) wrong based on 8 sessions
Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected in support of M-Theory, the so-called breakthrough theory that proponents claim will unify our understanding of matter, the origin of the universe, and the functioning of gravity. This theory is nothing more than "bunk" and "hot air" concocted by desperate scientists.

Which of the following arguments possesses a flaw similar to that presented in the skeptic's argument?

1) Jan makes things up to get attention. If you want proof, just look at how much she talks about her new boyfriend, but no one has ever met him!

2) Chris must be ashamed of his new girlfriend. When I ran into them together at the market, he tried to pretend that they were just friends.

3) SoftCo's continued delays in the release of its new operating system, ViewPoint, indicate that it must be having significant challenges in producing a bug-free product.

4) Other people say they've seen the Loch Ness Monster, and some have even taken photographs of it. Still others claim these sightings are hoaxes.

5)Some fans think that the many delays in the release of Thrashing Death's much-anticipated new album mean that the band hasn't actually recorded anything. But I think that they've actually finished it and are delaying release to build hype.

Source: Veri prep

Someone plz elaborate techiniques to solve || reasoning questions ,they are taking big time and still unsolvable.
Plz Help !!!

Edit: by carcass
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Plz Correct me if I am deviating somewhere!!
Consider KUDOS if the post was informative!!

Kaplan Promo CodeKnewton GMAT Discount CodesGMAT Pill GMAT Discount Codes
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 1739
Followers: 55

Kudos [?]: 565 [1] , given: 467

Re: Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected [#permalink] New post 25 Jan 2013, 07:09
1
This post received
KUDOS
No EVidence
Attachments

screenshot.6.jpg
screenshot.6.jpg [ 44.57 KiB | Viewed 379 times ]


_________________

KUDOS is the good manner to help the entire community.

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 1739
Followers: 55

Kudos [?]: 565 [0], given: 467

Re: Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected [#permalink] New post 21 Jan 2013, 17:22
@ targetgmatchotu

I noticed, lately, a bunch of questions from veritas prep question bank posted here on the board from you. As a matter of fact, I also noticed that you (maybe I'm right maybe I'm wrong) posted them because you have difficulties with CR (indeed all we have difficulties). As such, I suggest you, aside to revise each question and the explanation, to study what the question ask you, whatever it is: weaken assumption and so on.

Look at this

critical-reasoning-megathread-145178.html

Now back to the question at end, the best strategy for these kind of questions, that are a minor question type of the entire CR battery, is to UNDERSTAND the overall structure of the stimulus and read each word carefully. repeat carefully. the key is in these such words. Otherwise are even impossible to solve and , to be honest, you are right: are among the most difficulties questions

Stimulus: basically it says that a X theory is a waste of time to unify the different theories about the universe and so on.

Conclusion: al these information are "hot air"

Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected in support of M-Theory, the so-called breakthrough theory that proponents claim will unify our understanding of matter, the origin of the universe, and the functioning of gravity. This theory is nothing more than "bunk" and "hot air" concocted by desperate scientists.


A) Jan makes things up to get attention. If you want proof, just look at how much she talks about her new boyfriend, but no one has ever met him!

As you can see from the bold part that I highlighted you have the key word proof = evidence and the second part but no one has ever met him!

So basically, A says the same thing of the stimulus.

Now is clear ?? :)

Hope this helps
_________________

KUDOS is the good manner to help the entire community.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 318
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.7
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 67

Re: Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2013, 20:38
I think your explanation needs a little bit of correction.

A) Jan makes things up to get attention. If you want proof, just look at how much she talks about her new boyfriend, but no one has ever met him!

As you can see from the bold part that I highlighted you have the key word proof and the second part but no one has ever met him!

Conclusion: Jan makes things up to get attention
Evidence : she talks about her new boyfriend,who doesn't exist

Conclusion:M-Thry is bogus.
Evidence: Evidence is that there is no evidence in support of theory.

So (A). proof = No Evidence exist in support of A thry.

Plz correct me If I am wrong.
_________________

Plz Correct me if I am deviating somewhere!!
Consider KUDOS if the post was informative!!

Re: Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected   [#permalink] 24 Jan 2013, 20:38
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Although there has been great scientific debate for decades a3d 9 25 Jul 2007, 14:01
Popular new posts Although there has been great scientific debate for decades dancinggeometry 12 13 Sep 2008, 02:59
Popular new posts Although there has been great scientific debate for decades sh00nya 30 14 Apr 2010, 02:41
New posts EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Although there has been great scientific debate for decades IEsailor 9 02 Jun 2011, 12:15
New posts 2 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Even though there has been significant scientific debate for Vercules 7 14 Mar 2013, 21:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.