Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Sep 2014, 02:22

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 156 [0], given: 18

Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink] New post 12 Dec 2011, 00:23
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

27% (02:16) correct 73% (01:34) wrong based on 89 sessions
Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted. This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job. On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fundraisers
constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base. The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

Smithtown University's fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fundraisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.
This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university's fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university's fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
The majority of the donations that fund-raisers obtained for
Smithtown University this year were from new donors.
More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University's fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 May 2011
Posts: 163
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 71

Re: Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting don [#permalink] New post 18 Dec 2011, 05:51
Could you plz explain this? and why not C?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Dec 2011
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting don [#permalink] New post 18 Dec 2011, 06:36
The argument claims Smithtown's unusually high success rate in fundraising was due to farming known donors rather than canvassing potential new donors. We are asked to identify support for this argument.

A - States Smithtown fund-raisers were no more successful with new donors than other universities. We can conclude that the majority of their excess success was from known previous donors. This supports the argument and is the correct choice.
B - Average size of donation is outside the scope of argument.
C - Claims most repeat donors were not contacted by the fund-raisers. This is outside the scope of argument, which is about success rates. However, if anything, this would tend to weaken the argument as if there are many repeat donors not contacted, one might assume the fund-raisers were therefore focusing on contacting new donors.
D - Directly weakens the argument.
E - Directly weakens the argument.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 May 2011
Posts: 163
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 39 [1] , given: 71

Re: Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting don [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2011, 06:47
1
This post received
KUDOS
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Mar 2013
Posts: 70
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 108

CAT Tests
Re: Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2013, 08:09
Moderators and experts, kindly help! What is the OA? We have a different OA on this page and on smithtown-university-s-fund-raisers-succeeded-in-getting-78924.html.

THe question is same on both links though.
Re: Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting   [#permalink] 30 Dec 2013, 08:09
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Will I get a good university? lenalenakasi 1 26 Dec 2013, 02:47
Chances of getting into a top university with GRE akoduri 5 05 May 2011, 11:29
14 Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting drdas 161 03 Oct 2004, 12:02
i succeeded in GMAT test yankevi 4 31 Jul 2008, 07:53
1 Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting chunjuwu 9 19 Feb 2005, 23:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.