Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Sep 2014, 04:11

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1226
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink] New post 19 Feb 2005, 23:35
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

83% (02:17) correct 17% (02:56) wrong based on 2 sessions
Smithtown University’s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted. This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job.
On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fundraisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base. The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

A. Smithtown University’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fundraisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.

B. This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.

C. This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.

D. The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for
Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.

E. More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
Posts: 905
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 20 Feb 2005, 06:13
(C) it is..

All other choices do not support the argument.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 20 Feb 2005, 06:30
This is a sitting duck.
Obviously (C)
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
Posts: 905
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 20 Feb 2005, 06:34
anandnk wrote:
This is a sitting duck.


I did not get that :roll:
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1498
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 20 Feb 2005, 06:40
jpv wrote:
anandnk wrote:
This is a sitting duck.
I did not get that :roll:


sitting duck is easy to catch......
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1226
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 20 Feb 2005, 07:46
Thanks

OA is C
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
Posts: 905
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 20 Feb 2005, 09:52
MA wrote:
jpv wrote:
anandnk wrote:
This is a sitting duck.
I did not get that :roll:


sitting duck is easy to catch......


Now, I got it... thanx. MA :-D
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: PLAY HARD OR GO HOME
Joined: 25 Feb 2014
Posts: 124
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT Date: 11-08-2014
GPA: 3.1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 261

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink] New post 10 Apr 2014, 01:53
OA IS A GUYS !
SHOCKING !
CAN ANYONE ELABORATE ?
_________________

THE WORD IMPOSSIBLE ITSELF SAYS : I-M-POSSIBLE...SO,DREAM THE IMPOSSIBLE-AND DO THE INCREDIBLE

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Posts: 16
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [1] , given: 2

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink] New post 10 Apr 2014, 07:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
In my opinion, A is the right answer... let me know what you think.

Argument: SU's high success rate is not an indication of good fundraising, but rather of insufficient canvassing efforts.

Fact:
- good fundraising involves attempting to expand donor base.
- 80% is a high success rate.

Therefore, the answer will indicate that SU did not expand the donor base to such a level that would deem an 80% success rate a "good job", but still exceptionally high.

A. Smithtown University's fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fundraisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.
Yes: this answer shows that SU's efforts were no better than anybody else's; thus, in order to have gotten an 80% success rate, SU probably targeted people who were more likely to give.

B. This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university's fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
No: size of amount is irrelevant; does not indicate a larger donor base.

C. This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university's fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
No: irrelevant. We aren't talking about people who were not contacted.

D. The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.
No: this is the opposite of what we want.

E. More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University's fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.
No: this is opposite of what we want.

I did not choose C because the argument's definition of "good fundraising" or "insufficient fundraising efforts" is how much you solicit contributions from new donors; it is not clear on whether or not fundraising efforts are "good" or "sufficient" if you don't contact past donors. It's a tricky answer because in our mind, not contacting people at all might equate to poor fundraising efforts, but those are assumptions we cannot make.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 May 2013
Posts: 325
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: ISB '16, IIMA (M)
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 47

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink] New post 10 Apr 2014, 19:45
sammervash wrote:
In my opinion, A is the right answer... let me know what you think.

Argument: SU's high success rate is not an indication of good fundraising, but rather of insufficient canvassing efforts.

Fact:
- good fundraising involves attempting to expand donor base.
- 80% is a high success rate.

Therefore, the answer will indicate that SU did not expand the donor base to such a level that would deem an 80% success rate a "good job", but still exceptionally high.

A. Smithtown University's fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fundraisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.
Yes: this answer shows that SU's efforts were no better than anybody else's; thus, in order to have gotten an 80% success rate, SU probably targeted people who were more likely to give.

B. This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university's fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
No: size of amount is irrelevant; does not indicate a larger donor base.

C. This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university's fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
No: irrelevant. We aren't talking about people who were not contacted.

D. The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.
No: this is the opposite of what we want.

E. More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University's fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.
No: this is opposite of what we want.

I did not choose C because the argument's definition of "good fundraising" or "insufficient fundraising efforts" is how much you solicit contributions from new donors; it is not clear on whether or not fundraising efforts are "good" or "sufficient" if you don't contact past donors. It's a tricky answer because in our mind, not contacting people at all might equate to poor fundraising efforts, but those are assumptions we cannot make.


good analysis by samarvash.... however, WHAT'S THE OA?
Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting   [#permalink] 10 Apr 2014, 19:45
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Will I get a good university? lenalenakasi 1 26 Dec 2013, 02:47
2 Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting eybrj2 4 12 Dec 2011, 00:23
Chances of getting into a top university with GRE akoduri 5 05 May 2011, 11:29
14 Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting drdas 161 03 Oct 2004, 12:02
i succeeded in GMAT test yankevi 4 31 Jul 2008, 07:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.