Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 17 Sep 2014, 11:38

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 244
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Smithtown University’s fund [#permalink] New post 20 Jun 2008, 09:26
Peace Ho Guys...I agree this was a very interesting CR and I misread it and went with C....and thats where it ends!
GMAT Instructor
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 1270
Location: Madrid
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 125 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Smithtown University’s fund [#permalink] New post 30 Jun 2008, 11:42
I think the answer is A because it counters a possible objection. What if they were unusually successful with those who had never donated previously? Then the 80% figure would not indicate that they had been concentrating on "low-hanging" fruit
GMAT Instructor
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 967
Location: Toronto
Followers: 256

Kudos [?]: 680 [0], given: 3

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Smithtown University’s fund [#permalink] New post 01 Jul 2008, 04:11
durgesh79 wrote:
BTW I did some googling on this question. I Couldnt find a source or OA/OE. It has been disscussed on some other sites and fight is between A and C......


According to a year-old post on beatthegmat, the question is from Kaplan, and is not a real GMAT question.

I posted the following to beatthegmat about this question:

"The 80% is 'unusually high', according to the question. The argument is that the fundraisers concentrated more heavily on past donors, who are much more likely to donate, than they should have. A) says that the fundraisers had only average success when they sought contributions from people who had never donated. Already this suggests that the fundraisers are unexceptional. But, more importantly, if they only had average success with those who had never donated, how could they possibly have achieved their 'unusually high' 80%? This only seems possible if they focused mostly on past donors, as the argument contends."

I agree with earlier posts that C weakens the argument. If most past donors weren't even contacted by the fundraisers, the fundraisers must have been seeking donations from those who had never donated, which contradicts the argument's conclusion.
_________________

Nov 2011: After years of development, I am now making my advanced Quant books and high-level problem sets available for sale. Contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com for details.

Private GMAT Tutor based in Toronto

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Dec 2008
Posts: 24
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

CR - Smithtown (2 OAs, which one is correct?) [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2008, 11:36
Two OAs from 2 sources. Which one is correct?

Smithtown University’s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted. This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job. On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base. The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

A.Smithtown University’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.
B.This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
C.This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
D.The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.
E.More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 100
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Smithtown (2 OAs, which one is correct?) [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2008, 15:44
would go with c. totally strengthens the argument
3 KUDOS received
GMAT Instructor
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 967
Location: Toronto
Followers: 256

Kudos [?]: 680 [3] , given: 3

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - Smithtown (2 OAs, which one is correct?) [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2008, 16:49
3
This post received
KUDOS
It should be A. The argument is that the fundraisers concentrated more heavily on past donors, who are much more likely to donate, than they should have, leading to their 'unusually high' 80% success rate. C weakens the argument: C says that past donors donated without being contacted by the fundraisers at all; these donors then don't count towards the 80% success rate. If most of the past donors weren't approached by the fundraisers, who could the fundraisers have gotten their donations from? Clearly from people who were not past donors- making their 80% success rate, already 'unusually high', especially impressive because a sizeable proportion of the donors must have been new donors.

A says that the fundraisers had only average success when they sought contributions from people who had never donated. Already this suggests that the fundraisers are unexceptional. But, more importantly, if they only had average success with those who had never donated, how could they possibly have achieved their 'unusually high' 80%? This only seems possible if they focused mostly on past donors, as the argument contends. If they didn't approach many new donors, that would boost their overall success rate, because they were focusing on high probability targets, more so than is normal for university fundraisers, giving them an excellent conversion rate. They weren't especially good at picking the apples from the top of the tree, but by focusing on the low hanging fruit, they still had a great success percentage overall.
_________________

Nov 2011: After years of development, I am now making my advanced Quant books and high-level problem sets available for sale. Contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com for details.

Private GMAT Tutor based in Toronto

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Dec 2008
Posts: 24
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Smithtown (2 OAs, which one is correct?) [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2008, 18:26
You guys have identified those two OAs. Now, someone pls confirm a right OA. Thx.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2008
Posts: 106
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Smithtown (2 OAs, which one is correct?) [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2008, 20:21
(A) is correct

(C) is saying fund raisers had no role.
_________________

Kick GMAT ass

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 307
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 38 [1] , given: 7

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - Smithtown (2 OAs, which one is correct?) [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2008, 21:43
1
This post received
KUDOS
A is the right choice ..
Found Below explnation in test magic and found it to be quite convincing !!
Please weigh the explaination . A , not C

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What do you think it's wrong? Where?


B Clearly weakens the argument.
C If most of the donations by previous donors were unsolicited, then the 80% figure in the argument must be largely comprised of first-time donors. If that is the case, then the fundraisers did, in fact, do a good job (relative to other university fund-raisers), which refutes the argument.
D Weakens.
E Weakens
ANSWER: A If the fund-raisers had average success in securing donations from donors who had never supported Smithtown previously, and that rate of success for that population of donors is generally not so good (which the argument implies), then the 80% figure must be largely comprised of previous donors, which supports the contention of the argument. This is Question 29 in Sets 10 and 19. Be advised that the reference answer in the sets is C. However, I say it's wrong.

By popular demand, I'm going to try to make the case for A one more time. Here is the argument, re-written with A included as a premise. It bolsters one of the arguments assumptions and clearly strengthens the argument:

--Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted. Since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base. However, recent information reveals that Smithtown’s fund-raisers had merely average success in receiving donations from contacts with potential donors who had never donated before. Therefore, this exceptionally high relative success rate actually indicates that they were doing an average job, at best, and reflects insufficient canvassing effort.--
_________________

"CEO in making"

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1579
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 183 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - Smithtown (2 OAs, which one is correct?) [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2008, 22:28
Really tough one. I did not understand the argument itself. After seeing the explanation for OA, everything is clear now.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1300
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - Smithtown (2 OAs, which one is correct?) [#permalink] New post 31 Dec 2008, 01:19
Can anyone explain how does A imply that the efforts made were "average"?
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 283 [0], given: 1

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: CR - Smithtown (2 OAs, which one is correct?) [#permalink] New post 31 Dec 2008, 20:16
ritula wrote:
Can anyone explain how does A imply that the efforts made were "average"?


UnknownPhD wrote:
good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base.


The conclusion is based on the reasoning above that GOOD FUND-RAISERS should OFTEN (constantly) be the ones spending little effort to expand the doror base.

A points directly that the already-sucessful fund raisers spent greater effort (=as frequently as..)to expand the base than the GOOD FUND-RAISERS does. So "the already-successful raisers" are NOT "GOOD FUND-RAISERS"

C. at some degree rephrases "people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past"

Moreover, the argument is about THE SUCCESS of fund- raisers in getting donations rather than the donations themseves. C does not affect the argument
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1300
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - Smithtown (2 OAs, which one is correct?) [#permalink] New post 31 Dec 2008, 23:01
But I think in saying constantly try "less likely prospects". the argument means good fund raisers constantly try those people who havent donated previously
sondenso wrote:
ritula wrote:
Can anyone explain how does A imply that the efforts made were "average"?


UnknownPhD wrote:
good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base.


The conclusion is based on the reasoning above that GOOD FUND-RAISERS should OFTEN (constantly) be the ones spending little effort to expand the doror base.

A points directly that the already-sucessful fund raisers spent greater effort (=as frequently as..)to expand the base than the GOOD FUND-RAISERS does. So "the already-successful raisers" are NOT "GOOD FUND-RAISERS"

C. at some degree rephrases "people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past"

Moreover, the argument is about THE SUCCESS of fund- raisers in getting donations rather than the donations themseves. C does not affect the argument
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 118
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 2

Smithtown University’s fund-raisers [#permalink] New post 28 May 2009, 05:02
Smithtown University’s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted. This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job. On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base. The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

(A) Smithtown University’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.
(B) This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
(C) This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
(D) The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.
(E) More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.

Pls Explain
_________________

==============================================
Do not answer without sharing the reasoning behind ur choice
-----------------------------------------------------------
Working on my weakness : GMAT Verbal
------------------------------------------------------------
Ask:
Why, What, How, When, Where, Who
==============================================

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 261
Location: Kolkata
Schools: La Martiniere for Boys
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 9

GMAT Tests User
Re: Smithtown University’s fund-raisers [#permalink] New post 28 May 2009, 07:49
IMO C
_________________

Thanks
rampuria

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 118
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 2

Re: Smithtown University’s fund-raisers [#permalink] New post 28 May 2009, 11:18
rampuria wrote:
IMO C


why C? whats wrong with other options?
_________________

==============================================
Do not answer without sharing the reasoning behind ur choice
-----------------------------------------------------------
Working on my weakness : GMAT Verbal
------------------------------------------------------------
Ask:
Why, What, How, When, Where, Who
==============================================

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 840
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: Smithtown University’s fund-raisers [#permalink] New post 28 May 2009, 16:25
E

the argument states that smithtown university's fundraisers didnt try hard enough because they didnt canvas new donors well enough.

I think C is a trap and is out of scope because it states that the fundraisers didnt even contact the new donors that gave all of the cash

I would pick E because it says that more than half of the money raised by fundraisers came from new donors. If the fund raisers tried harder then all of the money raised by them would have come from new donors. The old donors would have donated on their own as in option C
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 258
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: Smithtown University’s fund-raisers [#permalink] New post 28 May 2009, 17:13
IMO C
Argument: This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job
The context here is like this: fund raisers succeed in 8 out of 10 prospect donors whom they contact (who have never donated before), but the majority of donations, for exp 1000 people, are from those who have donated in the past
So, C states the point

Smithtown University’s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted. This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job. On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base. The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

A. Smithtown University’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people ->out of scope
B. This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before -->no influence
C. This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors -->the best
D. The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before -->no influence. This is just a restating of the fact
E. More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university -->weaken
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 195
Schools: Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley, INSEAD
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: Smithtown University’s fund-raisers [#permalink] New post 28 May 2009, 21:13
[aligntable=][/aligntable]

C

This could mean that all the donations came from unsolicited offers, and every single person they contacted declined (goes against insufficient harvesting efforts).

Booya
_________________

Hades

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 261
Location: Kolkata
Schools: La Martiniere for Boys
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 9

GMAT Tests User
Re: Smithtown University’s fund-raisers [#permalink] New post 28 May 2009, 21:14
Evience which will show that new people have not contributed will support the argument
_________________

Thanks
rampuria

Re: Smithtown University’s fund-raisers   [#permalink] 28 May 2009, 21:14
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Will I get a good university? lenalenakasi 1 26 Dec 2013, 02:47
2 Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting eybrj2 4 12 Dec 2011, 00:23
Chances of getting into a top university with GRE akoduri 5 05 May 2011, 11:29
i succeeded in GMAT test yankevi 4 31 Jul 2008, 07:53
1 Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting chunjuwu 9 19 Feb 2005, 23:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9    Next  [ 162 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.