Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 21 Jan 2017, 19:35

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 71
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 64 [6] , given: 0

Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2004, 12:02
6
KUDOS
28
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

42% (02:18) correct 58% (01:36) wrong based on 1653 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Smithtown University’s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted. This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job. On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base. The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

(A) Smithtown University’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.
(B) This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
(C) This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
(D) The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.
(E) More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.

[Reveal] Spoiler: Why ?
Option C is out of scope: refer other forums : http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/cr- ... t8037.html
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by souvik101990 on 02 May 2016, 09:55, edited 3 times in total.
OA is edited
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 71
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 0

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2004, 21:55
This one was lost in the crowd...

Can people share their judgement/explanations on this one?
Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 71
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 0

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2004, 06:28
Franky.... Can you elaborate further? I think the purpose here is to learn collectively and would much appreciate the justification behind a certain answer choice
Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Posts: 162
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 0

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2005, 05:17
Smithtown Universityâ€™s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted. This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job. On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fundraisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base. The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

A. Smithtown Universityâ€™s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fundraisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.

B. This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the universityâ€™s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.

C. This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the universityâ€™s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.

D. The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.

E. More than half of the money raised by Smithtown Universityâ€™s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.
Intern
Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 44
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2006, 15:31
drdas wrote:
Smithtown Universityâ€™s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted. This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job. On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base. The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

A. Smithtown Universityâ€™s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.
B. This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the universityâ€™s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
C. This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the universityâ€™s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
D. The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.
E. More than half of the money raised by Smithtown Universityâ€™s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.

A. doesn't provide more support for the argument, as it just says that smithtown fundraisers are just as good as other fundraisers.
B. goes against the arguement that smithtown fundraisers wern't impressive.
C. supports that argument that smithtown fundraisers weren't really that successful themselves. says that smithtown didn't show sufficient "canvassing effort"
D. suggests that smithtown fundraisers were sucessful.
E. same as D.

Therefore ans is C.
Intern
Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2006, 22:17
(C) it is.

This was simple as you had to find an option which validated the fact that the fund raisers did not contact any new donors and they simply approached the previous donors.
Of all the options (C) is the only one which validated the argument.
VP
Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 1021
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2006, 16:20
Agree with C.
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 269
Location: Chennai,India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2006, 12:32
drdas wrote:
Smithtown Universityâ€™s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted. This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job. On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base. The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

A. Smithtown Universityâ€™s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people. - this contridicts the premisis
B. This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the universityâ€™s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before. - it says new doners - same reason as A
C. This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the universityâ€™s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors. - this reasons the without canvassing theory said in the premises so this is right !
D. The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before. - same as A
E. More than half of the money raised by Smithtown Universityâ€™s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university. - different words but same meaning as D

_________________

vazlkaiye porkalam vazltuthan parkanum.... porkalam maralam porkalthan maruma

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5238
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 0

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2006, 07:16
Only (C) hints at any sort of poor canvassing efforts.
Intern
Joined: 04 Feb 2006
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2006, 09:00
I agree it should be C
VP
Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 1065
Location: USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 0

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2006, 09:21
go C go.

Only C strongly supports the argument that there was not enough canvassing effort.
_________________

"To dream anything that you want to dream, that is the beauty of the human mind. To do anything that you want to do, that is the strength of the human will. To trust yourself, to test your limits, that is the courage to succeed."

- Bernard Edmonds

Manager
Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 92
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 May 2007, 08:50
(I don't have the OA)

S11-Q14. Smithtown Universityâ€™s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted. This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job. On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base. The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

A. Smithtown Universityâ€™s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.
B. This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the universityâ€™s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
C. This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the universityâ€™s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
D. The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.
E. More than half of the money raised by Smithtown Universityâ€™s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 874
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 111 [0], given: 0

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 May 2007, 09:49
C supports the conclusion that it was an insufficient canvassing effort.
Director
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 777
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 136 [0], given: 0

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 May 2007, 12:18
mine is also 'C'.
'C' most strongly supports the argument.
Manager
Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 176
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2007, 09:43
C it is
Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2007
Posts: 325
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2007, 09:56
straight C.

Javed.

Cheers!
Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2006
Posts: 298
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2007, 11:53
Yes to C

This must be an awful university if it does not even keep in touch with their previous doners!
Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 78
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 May 2007, 00:51
For me the answer is C.
Manager
Joined: 01 Dec 2006
Posts: 58
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 May 2007, 12:30
C for me too
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Posts: 281
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 May 2007, 21:15
C supports the last 2 sentences of the argument
_________________

AimHigher

Re: Smithtown University s fund-raisers succeeded in getting   [#permalink] 14 May 2007, 21:15

Go to page    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9    Next  [ 173 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
16 #Top150 CR: Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting 10 11 Dec 2015, 21:01
1 The Smithtown Theatre, which stages old plays, has announced an expans 2 15 Dec 2014, 08:02
7 Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting 5 12 Dec 2011, 00:23
1 High school students who feel that they are not succeeding 16 16 Mar 2007, 08:01
Last year, 1,200 Smithtown residents who work in hospitals 6 28 Feb 2007, 09:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by