Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Apr 2014, 19:23

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 46
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 61

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the [#permalink] New post 06 Nov 2010, 20:09
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

65% (01:48) correct 34% (00:31) wrong based on 44 sessions
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

A. a greater proportion than it was
B. a greater proportion than
C. a greater proportion than they have been
D. which is greater than was so
E. which is greater than it has been

[Reveal] Spoiler:
Major confusion what is the correct answer among A, B, C and why?


Source: GMATPrep.
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesManhattan GMAT Discount Codes
1 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2010
Posts: 259
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 62 [1] , given: 65

GMAT Tests User
Re: Soaring television costs [#permalink] New post 06 Nov 2010, 21:08
1
This post received
KUDOS
A. a greater proportion than it was
'It' doesn't have a clear referent.

B. a greater proportion than
Concise.

C. a greater proportion than they have been
'have been' is wrong tense. 'had been' or 'were' would have been correct.
D. which is greater than was so
'which' modifies presidential campaign and 'was so' is redundant.
E. which is greater than it has been
'which' modifies presidential campaign and 'has been' is wrong tense.


Even if there was another answer choice, written 'a greater proportion than they had been,' I would have still chosen B as the sentence does not need any further specification on what's being compared.

This is another example from an OG question.

Although Napoleon’s army entered Russia with far more supplies than in previous campaigns, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.
_________________

Consider KUDOS if my post was helpful. :-D

My Debrief: 750-q49v42-105591.html#p825487

Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Posts: 154
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 37

Re: Soaring television costs [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2010, 19:44
suchoudh wrote:
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

A. a greater proportion than it was
B. a greater proportion than
C. a greater proportion than they have been
D. which is greater than was so
E. which is greater than it has been

[Reveal] Spoiler:
Major confusion what is the correct answer among A, B, C and why?


Source: GMATPrep.


D and E are out in first place because of modifier issues.
C is awkward
A is out coz 'it' doesn't have a clear referrent.
So B wins...

IMO B
_________________

Thanks,
VP

Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 161
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: Soaring television costs [#permalink] New post 12 Nov 2010, 03:59
'It' is wrong is A and E.
"Which" is ambiguous in D and E.
"they have been" is the wrong usage in C.
1 KUDOS received
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 126
Followers: 44

Kudos [?]: 134 [1] , given: 1

Re: Soaring television costs [#permalink] New post 25 Jan 2011, 14:04
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Suchoudh, since you eliminated D and E, I'm guessing you know the "which" modifier/touch rule, which knocks out those two choices. ("Which" would refer back to 1992--that doesn't make sense!)

The phrase "greater...than" lets us know that we're comparing two things--remember that compared items must be logically comparable and structurally similar.

A, B, and C look very similar, except for their tail ends. A and C both contain prepositions.

(A) contains "it"-- what could be the antecedent for that pronoun? We have two singular options-- "campaign" and "spending." That's a problem-- ambiguity! Even if you're super versed in the GMAT and know that a certain degree of pronoun ambiguity can sometimes be tolerated (although typically not in the situation seen here), there is ANOTHER reason for eliminating (A): we are comparing a phrase and a clause--"the spending" versus "the spending was." ELIMINATE

In (B), "than" would be immediately followed by "in any previous election"...so the things we are comparing are "the spending IN" the 1992 campaign versus IN any previous election. This is ok.

In (C), we have the plural pronoun "they," which could only refer back to "costs"--- but we want to refer back to some form of "spending" (because we have "more than half the spending..." as the first chunk of that comparison). We also have the same phrase/clause issue that exists in (A)--ELIMINATE

That leaves B.
_________________


JP Park | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Los Angeles

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2010
Posts: 190
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 20

GMAT Tests User
Re: Soaring television costs [#permalink] New post 25 Jan 2011, 16:51
IMO B. A and C have pronoun problem, while D and E have modifier problem.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 454
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 39

GMAT Tests User
Re: Soaring television costs [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2011, 04:01
parker wrote:
Suchoudh, since you eliminated D and E, I'm guessing you know the "which" modifier/touch rule, which knocks out those two choices. ("Which" would refer back to 1992--that doesn't make sense!)

The phrase "greater...than" lets us know that we're comparing two things--remember that compared items must be logically comparable and structurally similar.

A, B, and C look very similar, except for their tail ends. A and C both contain prepositions.

(A) contains "it"-- what could be the antecedent for that pronoun? We have two singular options-- "campaign" and "spending." That's a problem-- ambiguity! Even if you're super versed in the GMAT and know that a certain degree of pronoun ambiguity can sometimes be tolerated (although typically not in the situation seen here), there is ANOTHER reason for eliminating (A): we are comparing a phrase and a clause--"the spending" versus "the spending was." ELIMINATE

In (B), "than" would be immediately followed by "in any previous election"...so the things we are comparing are "the spending IN" the 1992 campaign versus IN any previous election. This is ok.

In (C), we have the plural pronoun "they," which could only refer back to "costs"--- but we want to refer back to some form of "spending" (because we have "more than half the spending..." as the first chunk of that comparison). We also have the same phrase/clause issue that exists in (A)--ELIMINATE

That leaves B.


PLS, HELP, I do not understand why A is wrong because " comparing phrase and clause". Pls, explain and give example.
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2266
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 240

Kudos [?]: 1178 [0], given: 244

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Soaring television costs [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2011, 09:01
Expert's post
Of course, Parker, et al have brought out beautifully the fine points of the issue. Kudos to Parker and scheol79. I thought I would weigh in a different aspect of approaching the issue.

The subject is the plural ‘costs’ and hence the use of any pronoun such as ‘it’ or a singular verb as ‘is’, or ‘has been’ is wrong. As such one can dump A,D and E; Between B and C,C is wrong because it uses a wrong tense of present perfect for a bygone thing. In fact, a past perfect should have been used in this case, because the reference is for proportion prior to 1992 campaign.

B is left.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Next engagement on Nov-19-2011
Joined: 12 Jan 2011
Posts: 81
Location: New Delhi, India
Schools: IIM, ISB, & XLRI
WE 1: B.Tech (Information Technology)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 4

Re: Soaring television costs [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2011, 09:50
suchoudh wrote:
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

A. a greater proportion than it was
B. a greater proportion than
C. a greater proportion than they have been
D. which is greater than was so
E. which is greater than it has been

[Reveal] Spoiler:
Major confusion what is the correct answer among A, B, C and why?


Source: GMATPrep.


A. 'Than it was' is wordy
B. Concise and clear comparison
C. 'They' seems to point 'Costs' rather than proportion
D. 'Which' modifies noun before comma in this case campaign
E. 'Which' modifies noun before comma in this case campaign
_________________

GMAT is an addiction and I am darn addicted

Preparation for final battel:
GMAT PREP-1 750 Q50 V41 - Oct 16 2011
GMAT PREP-2 710 Q50 V36 - Oct 22 2011 ==> Scored 50 in Quant second time in a row :-)
MGMAT---- -1 560 Q28 V39 - Oct 29 2011 ==> Left Quant half done and continued with Verbal. Happy to see Q39 :-)

My ongoing plan: http://gmatclub.com/forum/550-to-630-need-more-to-achieve-my-dream-121613.html#p989311

Appreciate by kudos !!

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 454
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 39

GMAT Tests User
Re: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the [#permalink] New post 26 Oct 2011, 20:24
This is discussed at manhantan forum with higher quality. the problem is harder.
Re: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the   [#permalink] 26 Oct 2011, 20:24
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the damit 10 06 Sep 2004, 12:22
New posts Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the anuramm 1 06 Sep 2004, 21:17
Popular new posts Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the Levy 12 07 Nov 2004, 22:45
Popular new posts Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the sonaketu 13 02 May 2005, 21:39
New posts Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the nakib77 4 11 Nov 2005, 12:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.