Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 07:41

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2004
Posts: 120
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2004, 12:22
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campagign of 1992, a greater propotion that is was in any previous election
a. same
b. a greater propotion than
c. a greater propotion than they have been
d. which is greater than was so
e. which is greater that is has been
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 97
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2004, 12:52
B is probably the most concise of them all.

BTW, I assume the original is "a greater proportion than it was." You could leave it the way it is, but you'd then have to change than it was to than it had been to reflect the sequence (past perfect precedes simple past).
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Apr 2004
Posts: 224
Location: Utrecht
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2004, 12:57
I agree with B too.

Although I have to say that A and E sound very weird and maybe is an typo mistake.

Regards,

Alex
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2004
Posts: 120
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2004, 16:04
OA given here is C. do you guys think that is correct?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 97
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2004, 17:52
Naah, it would have to be a greater proportion than they HAD been and not...they have been.

Rule: if the main clause is in past tense, the subordinate clause has to be in past tense as well.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: CFA Level 2
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 267
Location: Hanoi
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2004, 21:02
intr3pid wrote:
Naah, it would have to be a greater proportion than they HAD been and not...they have been.

Rule: if the main clause is in past tense, the subordinate clause has to be in past tense as well.


I prefer B to C. However, C for the OA is fine.

"have been" is OK. The first event "Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending" is regarded as a point in the past and UPTIL NOW there HAS BEEN no similar event.
_________________

"Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you'r gonna get"

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Posts: 593
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2004, 23:45
And for "Soaring television costs", I guess, we would need a pronoun of "they" rather than "it".
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Dec 2003
Posts: 214
Location: US
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Sep 2004, 04:00
I am confused about C being the correct choice.

Here what is compared is not the television costs but the propotion of television costs to the total presidential campaign cost. So how can 'they' in choice C refer to television costs. Isn't there an ambiguity in choice C.

I feel that B is the correct answer.

Can anyone please clarify this.

Thanks.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Dec 2003
Posts: 214
Location: US
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Sep 2004, 10:44
Can anyone tell me what is the mistake in my reasoning. I feel that the answer should be B and not C.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 97
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Sep 2004, 13:14
bigtooth81 wrote:
intr3pid wrote:
Naah, it would have to be a greater proportion than they HAD been and not...they have been.

Rule: if the main clause is in past tense, the subordinate clause has to be in past tense as well.


I prefer B to C. However, C for the OA is fine.

"have been" is OK. The first event "Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending" is regarded as a point in the past and UPTIL NOW there HAS BEEN no similar event.


If you're comparing TV costs in all the elections uptil NOW, then this argument doesn't make any sense. The real meaning of the sentence is that there hasn't been any comparable event in any of the PREVIOUS elections. Previous from what? From the 2002 election (= now)? 1992 is previous from 2002. If the author wants to say that there has not been any comparable TV spending after 1992, he or she should will use the words following or after or subsequently, and not in the previous.

The following is what you'll say when you're comparing a past event with events happening after the past event:

"Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campagign of 1992, a greater propotion than in any subsequent/following election."
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 606
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Sep 2004, 13:35
C costs plural , refrred by they and the comparsion is clear.
  [#permalink] 07 Sep 2004, 13:35
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the metallicafan 5 11 Oct 2010, 20:04
15 Experts publish their posts in the topic Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the nightwing79 26 28 Jul 2009, 14:27
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the nakib77 4 11 Nov 2005, 12:27
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the sonaketu 13 02 May 2005, 21:39
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the Levy 12 07 Nov 2004, 22:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.